Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

January 1997 Employment Situation

Employment rose in January, and the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 5.4 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Employment rose in January, and the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 5.4 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.

The number of nonfarm payroll jobs, as measured by the monthly survey of establishments, rose by 271,000 in January, after seasonal adjustment. Total employment, as measured by the monthly survey of households, rose by about 430,000 over the month, after allowance is made for the effect of revised population controls introduced into the survey in January. (See note on page 4.)

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

Both the number of unemployed persons, 7.3 million, and the unemployment rate, 5.4 percent, were about unchanged in January, after seasonal adjustment. Jobless rates for the major demographic groups--adult men (4.6 percent), adult women (4.6 percent), teenagers (17.0 percent), whites (4.6 percent), blacks (10.8 percent), and Hispanics (8.3 percent)--also showed little or no change over the month. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

After adjusting for the effect of the revised population estimates, civilian employment rose by about 430,000 in January, to 128.6 million (seasonally adjusted). The proportion of the population that was employed (the employment-population ratio) edged up to 63.6 percent.

The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons was about unchanged in January at 4.4 million, after seasonal adjustment. This series has shown little definitive movement over the past year. (See table A-3.)

Approximately 7.6 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job in January. The proportion of all employed persons that held more than one job was 6.0 percent. (See table A-9.)

The civilian labor force, at 135.8 million (seasonally adjusted), increased by about 500,000 in January, after allowance for the revised population estimates. The labor force participation rate continued to trend upward, reaching 67.2 percent.

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

About 1.6 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in January--that is, they wanted and were available for work and had looked for jobs sometime in the prior 12 months. The number of discouraged workers--a subset of the marginally attached who were not currently looking for jobs specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them or there were none for which they would qualify--was 397,000 in January. (See table A-9.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 271,000 in January to 121.0 million, after seasonal adjustment. The services industry accounted for three-fifths of January’s increase, and manufacturing employment rose for the fourth straight month. (See table B-1.)

The services industry added 167,000 jobs in January, with business services and health services accounting for two-thirds of the gain. Within business services, growth continued in computer and data processing services, and there was an exceptionally large job gain in help supply services, after seasonal adjustment. While there does appear to have been some genuine strength in help supply services in January, the magnitude of the increase was exaggerated somewhat by special factors affecting the seasonally adjusted data. Health services employment rose by 43,000 in January, with sizable increases occurring in offices and clinics of medical doctors and in hospitals.

Employment in transportation rose by 16,000. Retail trade employment was little changed overall in January. Job gains in apparel stores, eating and drinking places, and other retail industries were offset by a large decline in general merchandise stores. Still, employment in general merchandise stores was slightly higher than the level recorded in September, just prior to the holiday hiring period. Employment in finance, insurance, and real estate rose modestly in January, as continued job gains in finance and real estate were partly offset by declines in insurance.

Manufacturing employment rose by 18,000 in January, building on a slow growth trend that began last October. Gains were concentrated in transportation equipment, including both aircraft and motor vehicles, and in industrial machinery and food products. Employment in apparel continued its long-term decline; this industry has lost 200,000 jobs, or one-fifth of its workforce, over the past 5 years. Employment in the construction industry continued to trend upward, but the January increase was limited by severe weather conditions in some parts of the country.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls fell sharply in January--0.7 hour--to 34.1 hours, seasonally adjusted, reflecting the impact of extreme weather in many areas during the survey reference period. The length of the workweek was down in each of the major industry groups. The manufacturing workweek, 41.7 hours, was down by 0.3 hour in January. Factory overtime was unchanged at 4.6 hours. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of private production or nonsupervisory workers on nonfarm payrolls fell by 1.7 percent to 137.0 (1982=100) in January, as the decline in the average workweek more than offset the rise in employment. The manufacturing index fell by 0.7 percent to 106.2. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of private production or nonsupervisory workers on nonfarm payrolls edged up by 1 cent in January to $12.06, seasonally adjusted, following large increases in the prior 2 months. Reflecting the decline in the workweek, average weekly earnings fell by 1.9 percent to $411.25. Over the past year, average hourly earnings rose by 3.8 percent and average weekly earnings increased by 4.7 percent. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 7, 1997.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 8, 1997Publication referenceFeb 7, 199730 days laterMar 9, 1997
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.67%Observed 7.74%Observed +7 bps vs. earlier reference7.84%Observed +10 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 7, 1996 – May 7, 1997
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 7, 1997Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.00%7.75%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.67% · Nov 8, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.59% · Nov 15, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.53% · Nov 22, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.52% · Nov 29, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.44% · Dec 6, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.57% · Dec 13, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.74% · Dec 20, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.64% · Dec 27, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.67% · Jan 3, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jan 10, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.87% · Jan 17, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · Jan 24, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Jan 31, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.74% · Feb 7, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Feb 14, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.56% · Feb 21, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Feb 28, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Mar 7, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Mar 14, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · Mar 21, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.97% · Mar 28, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.18% · Apr 4, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.15% · Apr 11, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Apr 18, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.08% · Apr 25, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 8.01% · May 2, 1997Nov 7, 1996Feb 7, 1997May 7, 1997
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,147.16/month

7.74% · Feb 7, 1997

At the later reference$2,167.92/month

7.84% · Mar 7, 1997

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $20.76 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →