Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

September 2006 Employment Cost Index

Total compensation costs for civilian workers increased 1.0 percent from June to September 2006, seasonally adjusted, virtually unchanged from the 0.9 percent gain from March to June, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S.…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Total compensation costs for civilian workers increased 1.0 percent from June to September 2006, seasonally adjusted, virtually unchanged from the 0.9 percent gain from March to June, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Benefit costs between June and September rose 1.1 percent, compared with the gain of 0.8 percent from the previous quarter. Wages and salaries increased 0.9 percent during the quarter, unchanged from the gain of the previous quarter. The Employment Cost Index (ECI), a component of the National Compensation Survey, measures quarterly changes in compensation costs, which include wages, salaries, and employer costs for employee benefits for civilian workers (nonfarm private industry and state and local government).

Increases in benefit costs accounted for one-third of the rise in compensation costs for civilian workers from June to September 2006. Among private industry workers, benefit costs attributed about one-fourth of the compensation gains during the quarter. Among state and local government workers, benefit costs comprised approximately two-fifths of the compensation cost gains during the June to September quarter. Health insurance costs and defined benefit contributions represented over one-quarter of the gain in compensation costs for state and local government workers from June to September 2006.

Quarterly changes, seasonally adjusted

Compensation costs for the private sector rose 0.9 percent from June to September, after advancing 0.8 percent in the prior quarter. For state and local government workers, compensation costs increased 1.4 percent from June to September, after increasing 1.1 percent for the quarter ended in June. (See tables A and 1.)

Wages and salaries of civilian workers increased 0.9 percent during the September quarter, unchanged from the gain of the June quarter. Wages and salaries for private industry workers rose 0.8 percent for the September quarter, compared with an increase of 0.9 percent in the prior quarter. Wages and salaries in state and local government advanced 1.4 percent during the June to September period, higher than the 0.9 percent gain in the prior quarter. (See tables A and 2.)

Benefit costs advanced 1.1 percent for civilian workers in the September quarter, compared with a 0.8 percent gain in the June quarter. Private sector benefit costs rose 1.0 percent for the September quarter, following a 0.7 percent gain in the previous quarter. Benefit costs for state and local government workers increased 1.5 percent in the September quarter, unchanged from the gain in June. (See tables A and 3.)

Over-the-year changes, not seasonally adjusted

Annual compensation costs for civilian workers increased 3.3 percent for the year ended September 2006, compared with a 3.0 percent over-the-year increase for September 2005. Compensation costs in private industry rose 3.0 percent in the year ended September 2006, compared with a 2.9 percent increase in September 2005. For state and local governments, compensation costs increased 4.1 percent for the year ended September 2006, compared with the over-the-year gain of 3.9 percent in September 2005. (See tables B, 4, 5, and 7.)

The components of compensation differed in their rates of change. While increases in wages and salaries became greater, the sharp increases in benefit costs seen for civilian and private industry workers over the past several years slowed to a more moderate pace. For civilian workers, wages and salaries rose 3.2 percent in the year ended September 2006, greater than the gain of 2.3 percent in September 2005 and 2.5 percent in September 2004. Benefit costs gained 3.3 percent for civilian workers for the year ended September 2006, slowing significantly from increases of 5.0 percent for the year ended September 2005 and 6.6 percent for the year ended September 2004. (See tables B, 8, and 12.)

Nonfarm private industry

For the year ended September 2006, compensation costs increased 2.2 percent for goods-producing industries, slowing from the increase of 3.4 percent for the year ended September 2005. The rise in compensation costs for manufacturing moderated for the year ending September 2006, advancing 1.6 percent compared with the 3.2 percent gain in September 2005. Compensation costs for construction rose 3.3 percent in September 2006, the same rate of increase as in September 2005. (See table 5.)

The over-the-year increase for September 2006 in compensation for service-providing industries was 3.2 percent, compared with the 2.8 percent gain for the year ended September 2005. Among service-providing supersector industries, compensation gains ranged from 2.8 percent in the leisure and hospitality industry to 3.9 percent in education and health services. For the year ended September 2006, compensation costs jumped 10.7 percent in the utilities industry sector, higher than the increase of 4.5 percent for the year ended September 2005. In contrast, compensation costs slowed sharply for the real estate and rental and leasing sector, increasing 1.6 percent for September 2006 compared with a jump of 8.0 percent for the year ended September 2005. (See table 5.)

Among white-collar occupational groups, over-the-year compensation cost gains for the year ended September 2006 ranged from 2.5 percent for sales and related workers, to 3.6 percent for professional and related employees. Among blue-collar occupational groups, compensation cost changes ranged from 2.0 percent for production workers to 3.6 percent for construction and extraction workers. Compensation costs for service workers gained 2.8 percent for the year ended September 2006. (See table 5.)

Compensation costs for union workers advanced 2.8 percent over the year ended September 2006, compared with 3.0 percent for the year ended September 2005. For nonunion workers, compensation costs rose 3.1 percent for the year ended September 2006, compared with a gain of 2.9 percent in September 2005. Wages and salaries for nonunion workers rose 3.2 percent for the 12 months ended in September 2006, compared with the over-the-year increase of 2.2 percent for union workers. Benefit costs for union workers rose 3.6 percent, compared with the 2.7 percent gain for nonunion workers in September 2006. (See tables C, 6, 10, and 12.)

State and local government

Wages and salaries for state and local government workers rose 3.7 percent in the year ended September 2006, greater than the gain of 2.6 percent for the year ended September 2005. Benefit costs rose 5.2 percent for the year ended September 2006, moderating from the gain of 6.5 percent for the year ended September 2005. (See tables B, 11, and 12.)

For the year ended September 2006, compensation costs increased 5.6 percent for the health care and social assistance industry, significantly higher than the 3.3 percent increase for the year ended September 2005. Compensation costs for elementary and secondary schools rose 4.9 percent, compared with an increase of 3.7 percent for the year ended September 2005. Among occupational groups, compensation costs for professional and related workers rose 4.6 percent, for office and administrative support workers, 4.3 percent, and for service workers, 4.0 percent for the year ended September 2006. (See table 7.)

Over-the-year changes in wages and salaries, constant dollars, not seasonally adjusted

Annual changes are computed in terms of December 2005 dollars to give an approximate measure of changes in wages and salaries after adjustment for the changes over the same time in the price of consumer goods and services. These estimates, in "constant dollars," show that wages and salaries for civilian workers rose 1.1 percent for the year ended September 2006; a 3.2 percent gain in nominal wages and salaries for the year ended September 2006 was offset by an increase of 2.1 percent in the Consumer Price Index for the same time period. Wages and salaries for civilian workers declined 2.3 percent for the year ended September 2005. Wages and salaries in private industry rose 1.0 percent in the year ended September 2006, compared with a decline of 2.3 percent in September 2005. Wages and salaries increased 1.6 percent for state and local government workers for the year ended September 2006, compared with an over-the-year decrease of 2.0 percent in September 2005. These inflation-adjusted ECI series were derived using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. City Average All Items. (See table D, the Technical Note, and the Constant Dollar historical listing at http://www.bls.gov/web/ecconst.pdf, for details.)

ECI data are available on the Compensation Cost Trends page at http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm. To access data using Anonymous FTP, use the Internet address ftp://ftp.bls.gov.

For technical assistance in using the BLS Internet site, send e-mail to webmaster@bls.gov. For ECI data requests, send e-mail to NCSinfo@bls.gov.

BLS news releases, including the ECI, are available through an e-mail subscription service. See the subscription link on http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm or http://www.bls.gov/bls/newsrels.htm.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Oct 31, 2006.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read compensation costs separately from job growth

The Employment Cost Index tracks changes in employers’ hourly compensation costs, including wages, salaries and benefits. Its fixed employment weights limit the effect of shifts between industries and occupations; it does not count newly created jobs. Compare wage and benefit components, and check whether the quoted change is for three months or twelve months and whether it is seasonally adjusted. Compensation trends are one part of the inflation and policy picture, without determining a particular mortgage rate. BLS Employment Cost Index.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 1, 2006Publication referenceOct 31, 200630 days laterNov 30, 2006
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.31%Observed 6.40%Observed +9 bps vs. earlier reference6.14%Observed −26 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jul 31, 2006 – Jan 31, 2007
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Oct 31, 2006Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.00%6.50%7.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.63% · Aug 3, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.55% · Aug 10, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.52% · Aug 17, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.48% · Aug 24, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.44% · Aug 31, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.47% · Sep 7, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.43% · Sep 14, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.40% · Sep 21, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Sep 28, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.30% · Oct 5, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.37% · Oct 12, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.36% · Oct 19, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.40% · Oct 26, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Nov 2, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.33% · Nov 9, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Nov 16, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Nov 22, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.14% · Nov 30, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Dec 7, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.12% · Dec 14, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Dec 21, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Dec 28, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Jan 4, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.21% · Jan 11, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.23% · Jan 18, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.25% · Jan 25, 2007Jul 31, 2006Oct 31, 2006Jan 31, 2007
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,876.52/month

6.40% · Oct 26, 2006

At the later reference$1,825.74/month

6.14% · Nov 30, 2006

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $50.78 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →