Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 2003 Employment Cost Index

The Employment Cost Index for total compensation for civilian workers rose 0.9 percent from March to June 2003, following a 1.3 percent gain from December 2002 to March 2003, seasonally adjusted, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Employment Cost Index for total compensation for civilian workers rose 0.9 percent from March to June 2003, following a 1.3 percent gain from December 2002 to March 2003, seasonally adjusted, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Benefit costs increased 1.4 percent and continued to substantially outpace the 0.6 percent gain in wages and salaries for civilian workers in June. The Employment Cost Index (ECI), a component of the National Compensation Survey, measures quarterly changes in compensation costs, which include wages, salaries, and employer costs for employee benefits, for nonfarm private and State and local government workers.

Employer costs for wages and salaries, accounting for over 70 percent of compensation costs, rose 2.7 percent for the year ending June 2003. Year ending wage and salary increases from June 1983 through June 2003 have ranged from 2.8 in June 1993 to 5.7 percent in June 1983. Benefit costs rose 6.3 percent for the year ending June 2003. Much of the increase in benefit costs again stemmed from the continuing rise in the costs for health insurance. Year-ending benefit increases from June 1993 through June 2003 have ranged from 1.8 percent in June 1996 to 5.5 percent in June 1993.

Quarterly changes, seasonally adjusted

Compensation costs for private sector workers rose 0.8 from March to June, after jumping 1.4 percent in the prior quarter. For State and local government workers, the increase in compensation costs was 1.0 percent from March to June, compared with the gain of 0.9 percent for the quarter ended in March. Gains in private sector compensation costs were led by large increases in nondurable manufacturing; transportation and public utilities; and construction. Private sector compensation gains were dampened by retail trade and wholesale trade. (See tables A and 1.)

Benefit costs moderated during the quarter, advancing 1.4 percent for civilian workers (nonfarm private industry and State and local government) in the June 2003 quarter following a sharp gain of 2.2 percent in the March quarter. In the private sector, benefit costs rose 1.3 percent for the June quarter, slowing significantly from the 2.4 percent gain of the previous quarter. By contrast, the increase for State and local governments was 1.3 percent in the June quarter, following a 1.5 percent increase in March 2003.

Gains in wages and salaries also moderated during the quarter, increasing 0.6 percent for both civilian and private sector workers during the June quarter, each following a 1.0 percent rise in the March quarter. Private sector wage gains were led by construction and nondurable manufacturing industries. Wage and salaries in the private sector were slowed by wholesale trade and retail trade, and service workers. Wages and salaries in State and local government advanced 0.8 percent during the March to June 2003 period, after gaining 0.7 percent in the December 2002 to March 2003 quarter.

Over-the-year changes, not seasonally adjusted

Annual compensation costs for civilian workers (not seasonally adjusted) increased 3.7 percent for the year ended June 2003, compared with a 4.0 percent over-the-year increase for June 2002. Compensation costs in private industry rose 3.5 percent in the year ended June 2003, compared with greater increases of 4.0 percent for years ending June 2002 and June 2001. In contrast, State and local government compensation costs increased 4.1 percent for the year ended June 2003; over-the-year gains were a more modest 3.6 percent in June 2002 and June 2001. (See tables B, 2, and 3.)

Although over-the-year compensation gains remained relatively constant for the years ending June 2002 and June 2003, the components of compensation showed significant differences. While increases in wages and salaries slowed, benefit costs rose sharply during the year ending June 2003. For civilian workers, wages and salaries rose 2.7 percent in the year ended June 2003, compared with a gain of 6.3 percent for benefits. Benefit costs for State and local government rose sharply, increasing 6.8 percent for the year ending June 2003, compared with an increase of 4.6 percent for the year ending June 2002. (See tables B, 5, 6, and 8.)

Nonfarm private industry

For the year ended June 2003, compensation costs in private industry increased 4.4 percent for goods-producing industries, higher than the 3.6 percent advance for the year ended June 2002. Compensation costs for manufacturing advanced 4.6 percent in June 2003, after increasing 3.6 percent in June 2002. Compensation costs for construction rose 3.8 percent in June 2003 compared with a 3.3 percent rise in June 2002. (See table 3.)

The over-the-year increase in compensation for service-producing industries slowed to 3.2 percent, compared with a 4.2 percent gain for the year ended June 2002. Among service-producing industries, the 12-month increase for finance, insurance, and real estate was 6.6 percent for the year ended in June 2003, led by increases in banking, savings and loan, and other credit agencies. Compensation costs were 1.2 percent for retail trade and 1.6 percent in business services in the year ended June 2003.

Over-the-year compensation cost increases were 3.4 percent for white- collar occupations, 4.1 percent for blue-collar occupations, and 3.3 percent for service occupations for the year ended June 2003. Among white- collar occupational groups, compensation changes ranged from 2.2 percent for sales workers to 4.1 percent for administrative support, including clerical workers. Among blue-collar workers, compensation cost increases ranged from 3.7 percent for transportation and material moving workers to 4.3 percent for handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers, and laborers. (See table 3.)

Compensation costs for union workers advanced 5.0 percent over the year ending June 2003, greater than the 3.3 percent increase for nonunion workers. Compensation costs among blue-collar union workers rose 5.1 percent, higher than the gain of 3.4 percent for blue-collar nonunion workers. In goods-producing industries, the 5.6 percent increase for union workers was greater than the 4.0 percent advance for nonunion workers. (See tables C and 4.)

Wages and salaries for union workers rose 3.0 percent for the 12 months ended in June 2003. This compares with an over-the-year increase of 2.5 percent for nonunion workers. Benefit costs for union workers rose sharply, 8.7 percent, greater than the increase of 5.5 percent for nonunion workers in June 2003. (See tables C, 7, and 8.)

Compensation costs, led by higher benefit costs, accelerated for union workers, rising 5.0 percent for the year ending June 2003 compared with a 4.5 percent gain in June 2002. Compensation for nonunion workers increased 3.3 percent for the year ending June 2003 compared with an over- the-year gain of 3.9 percent in June 2002.

Among the four geographic regions, increases in compensation costs ranged from 2.5 percent in the South to 4.8 percent in the Midwest for the year ended in June 2003. Compensation costs rose 3.3 percent in the Northeast and 4.1 percent in the West. (See table 4.)

State and local government

In State and local government, the June 2003 over-the-year increase in wages and salaries was 3.1 percent, compared with a gain of 3.2 percent for June 2002. Among occupational groups, wages of service and blue- collar workers rose 2.9 percent for the year ended June 2003; wages for white-collar workers rose 3.1 percent. Benefit costs jumped 6.8 percent for June 2003, significantly higher than the June 2002 gain of 4.6 percent. (See tables B, 5, and 8.)

Supplemental data from the ECI, providing 12-month percent changes in employer costs for health insurance in private industry from June 1982 to June 2003, will be available shortly after publication of this news release on the Internet site http://www.bls.gov/ect/home.htm or upon request.

The costs per hour worked of compensation components, based on data from the ECI, were published on June 11, 2003, in a news release titled "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation-March 2003."

ECI data are available on the Compensation Cost Trends page at http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm. To access data using Anonymous FTP, use the Internet address ftp://ftp.bls.gov.

For technical assistance in using the BLS Internet site, send e-mail to webmaster@bls.gov. For ECI data requests, send e-mail to ocltinfo@bls.gov.

The ECI news release is available through an e-mail subscription service. See the subscription link on http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm or http://www.bls.gov/bls/newsrels.htm.

News releases and other information are available from the BLS fax-on- demand service. To request a document fax, call (202) 691-6325. To request a catalog of available documents, select option 2 at the initial voice prompt. To request data found in this news release, enter the following codes:

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 31, 2003.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read compensation costs separately from job growth

The Employment Cost Index tracks changes in employers’ hourly compensation costs, including wages, salaries and benefits. Its fixed employment weights limit the effect of shifts between industries and occupations; it does not count newly created jobs. Compare wage and benefit components, and check whether the quoted change is for three months or twelve months and whether it is seasonally adjusted. Compensation trends are one part of the inflation and policy picture, without determining a particular mortgage rate. BLS Employment Cost Index.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 1, 2003Publication referenceJul 31, 200330 days laterAug 30, 2003
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.24%Observed 5.94%Observed +70 bps vs. earlier reference6.32%Observed +38 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 30, 2003 – Oct 31, 2003
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 31, 2003Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.00%5.75%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 5.70% · May 2, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.62% · May 9, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.45% · May 16, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.34% · May 23, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.31% · May 30, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.26% · Jun 6, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Jun 13, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.21% · Jun 20, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.24% · Jun 27, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.40% · Jul 4, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.52% · Jul 11, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Jul 18, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Jul 25, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.14% · Aug 1, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Aug 8, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Aug 15, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.28% · Aug 22, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.32% · Aug 29, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.44% · Sep 5, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.16% · Sep 12, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.01% · Sep 19, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Sep 26, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.77% · Oct 3, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.95% · Oct 10, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Oct 17, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Oct 24, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Oct 31, 2003Apr 30, 2003Jul 31, 2003Oct 31, 2003
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,787.10/month

5.94% · Jul 25, 2003

At the later reference$1,860.83/month

6.32% · Aug 29, 2003

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $73.74 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →