2018 First Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 0.4 percent during the first quarter of 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.7 percent and hours worked increased 2.3 percent. (All…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics5 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
First Quarter 2018, Revised
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 0.4 percent during the first quarter of 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.7 percent and hours worked increased 2.3 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2018, productivity increased 1.3 percent, reflecting a 3.6-percent increase in output and a 2.3-percent increase in hours worked. (See tables A1 and 2.)
Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked by all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 2.9 percent in the first quarter of 2018, reflecting a 3.3-percent increase in hourly compensation and a 0.4-percent increase in productivity. Unit labor costs increased 1.3 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A1 and 2.)
BLS calculates unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity. Increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs, and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.
Manufacturing sector labor productivity decreased 1.2 percent in the first quarter of 2018, as output increased 1.7 percent and hours worked increased 2.9 percent. Productivity declined 0.8 percent in the durable manufacturing sector, as output rose 3.3 percent and hours worked increased 4.2 percent. In the non-durable goods manufacturing sector, a 0.9-percent decrease in productivity reflected no change in output and a 0.9-percent increase in hours worked. Over the last four quarters, total manufacturing sector productivity increased 0.3 percent, as output increased 2.0 percent and hours worked increased 1.7 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing increased 5.2 percent in the first quarter of 2018 and rose 2.5 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A1 and 3.)
The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See the Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.
Preliminary first-quarter 2018 measures were announced today for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 1.9 percent in the first quarter of 2018 and increased 1.7 percent over the last four quarters. Unit profits of nonfinancial corporations fell at a 9.5 percent annual rate in the first quarter of 2018 and increased 1.7 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A2 and 6.)
Revised measures
Measures released today are based on more recent source data than were available for the preliminary report. Table B1 presents previous and revised productivity and related measures for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors for the first quarter of 2018.
In the first quarter of 2018, nonfarm business productivity rose 0.4 percent, rather than 0.7 percent as reported May 3, the combined effect of a 0.1-percentage point downward revision to output and a 0.2- percentage point upward revision to hours worked. Unit labor costs were revised up--due primarily to the downward revision to productivity--and increased 2.9 percent. In the manufacturing sector, productivity was revised down from an increase of 0.5 percent to a decrease of 1.2 percent, due almost entirely to a 1.6-percentage point downward revision to output. Hourly compensation was revised up 0.7 percentage point. As a result of the downward revision to productivity and the upward revision to hourly compensation, unit labor costs increased 5.2 percent rather than 2.7 percent as previously reported.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, labor productivity in the nonfarm business sector increased at the same 0.3-percent rate reported May 3. Hourly compensation was revised up, and increased 2.9 percent. As a result, unit labor costs increased 2.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017, rather than increasing 2.1 percent. Total manufacturing sector productivity increased 4.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017, a smaller increase than previously reported. Hourly compensation was revised up 2.3 percentage points; and when combined with the small downward revision to productivity this led to an upward revision to unit labor costs, which rose 0.2 percent rather than decreasing 2.2 percent.
Manufacturing output and all related measures--including labor productivity--were revised back as far as 2008 to incorporate revised BLS measures of sectoral output in manufacturing industries published May 16, 2018 in Multifactor Productivity Trends In Manufacturing - 2016. The period most affected was from 2014 to 2016, with the average annual rate of productivity growth over this period revised down from -0.1 percent to -0.6 percent. The average annual rate of manufacturing productivity growth from 2007 to 2017 was unrevised at 0.7 percent, well below the long-term rate from 1987 to 2017 of 2.7 percent. (See tables 3, 4, and 5, and appendix tables 1, 2, and 3.) For more complete information see www.bls.gov/mfp/sectoraloutputrevisions.htm.
In the nonfinancial corporate sector, productivity rose 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 rather than increasing 0.8 percent as previously reported, due solely to an upward revision to output. Annual average productivity in the nonfinancial corporate sector increased 1.0 percent in 2017, the same as the preliminary estimate. Unit profits rose 2.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017, rather than the 2.6 percent increase reported May 3. (See table 6.)
Complete annual and quarterly data series can be found on the Productivity and Costs home page: www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Separate output per hour from compensation per unit
Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$1,530.77/month
4.56% · May 31, 2018
At the later reference$1,523.62/month
4.52% · Jul 5, 2018
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $7.15 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.