2016 Fourth Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.3-percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.2 percent and hours worked increased 0.9…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics5 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages 2016, Preliminary
Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 1.3-percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today, as output increased 2.2 percent and hours worked increased 0.9 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the fourth quarter of 2015 to the fourth quarter of 2016, productivity increased 1.0 percent, reflecting increases in output and hours worked of 2.2 percent and 1.1 percent, respectively. (See table A1.) Annual average productivity increased 0.2 percent from 2015 to 2016. (See table C1.)
Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 1.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016, reflecting a 3.0-percent increase in hourly compensation and a 1.3-percent increase in productivity. Unit labor costs increased 1.9 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A1 and 2.)
BLS calculates unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity. Increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs, and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.
Manufacturing sector labor productivity increased 0.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016, as output increased 0.8 percent and hours worked were unchanged. Output per hour increased 0.1 percent in the durable goods manufacturing sector and 1.8 percent in the nondurable goods sector. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing sector productivity increased 0.4 percent, output increased 0.2 percent, and hours worked decreased 0.2 percent. (See tables A1, 3, 4, and 5.) Unit labor costs in manufacturing increased 3.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016 and rose 2.2 percent from the same quarter a year ago. Hourly compensation increased 4.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016.
The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See the Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.
Annual averages
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector rose 2.6 percent in 2016, reflecting increases of 2.8 percent in hourly compensation and 0.2 percent in productivity. The increase in unit labor costs is the largest since 2007, when unit labor costs rose 2.7 percent. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 1.5 percent in 2016.
In the manufacturing sector, productivity increased 0.6 percent in 2016, as output increased 0.2 percent and hours worked decreased 0.4 percent. The decrease in the annual hours series was the first since a 12.9-percent annual decrease in 2009. Manufacturing sector productivity has increased at an annual rate of less than 1.0 percent in each of the last 4 years. The average annual rate of manufacturing productivity growth from 2007 to 2016 is 1.7 percent, which is below the long-term rate from 1987 to 2016 of 3.2 percent. Unit labor costs increased 2.6 percent in 2016.
Revised measures
Revised and previously published measures for the third quarter of 2016 are shown in tables A2 and B1 and cover the following major sectors: nonfarm business, business, manufacturing, and nonfinancial corporations.
In the third quarter of 2016, nonfarm business productivity was revised up 0.4 percentage point, to an increase of 3.5 percent. (See table B1.) Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 0.2 percent in the third quarter--rather than 0.7 percent as previously reported.
In the manufacturing sector, productivity was revised down 0.4 percentage point to show no change in the third quarter of 2016. Manufacturing unit labor costs increased 3.3 percent, the same rate as previously reported.
In the nonfinancial corporate sector, productivity was revised down 0.6 percentage point in the third quarter of 2016, to an increase of 6.5 percent. This downward revision to productivity is due primarily to a 0.5-percentage point downward revision to output. (See table A2.) This release incorporates revised historical source data on output in nonfinancial corporations, published December 22, 2016 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This led to revisions back to 1947 for all quarterly and annual output-related measures including productivity and unit labor costs. The average annual rate of productivity growth from 2007 to 2015 in the nonfinancial corporate sector was revised down from 1.3 percent to 0.9 percent. The long-term rate for average annual productivity growth from 1947 to 2015 was revised down 0.1 percentage point to 2.2 percent.
Quarterly and annual data for all sectors from 2014 to 2016 appear in tables 1-6. Historical annual indexes for the nonfinancial corporate sector can be found in appendix table 1. Full historical measures can be found on the Productivity and Costs home page: www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.
Methodology change for hours worked
Beginning with the Productivity and Costs news release scheduled for March 8, 2017, an improvement in the methodology for estimating hours worked will be implemented. As a result, hours worked and related measures, including labor productivity, will be subject to revision for all sectors from 1989 forward. For more information see: www.bls.gov/lpc/hwhpnew.htm.
Calendar year 2017 release dates for Productivity and Costs news releases are now available at www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/prod2.htm.
Durable Previous quarter 0.1 0.7 0.7 3.9 0.4 3.8 Manufacturing A year ago 1.1 0.8 -0.2 2.7 0.9 1.6
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Separate output per hour from compensation per unit
Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$1,465.30/month
4.19% · Feb 2, 2017
At the later reference$1,449.60/month
4.10% · Mar 2, 2017
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $15.71 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.