Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2014 First Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 1.7 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2014, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The decrease in productivity reflects increases of 0.3 percent in…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2014, Preliminary

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 1.7 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2014, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The decrease in productivity reflects increases of 0.3 percent in output and 2.0 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the first quarter of 2013 to the first quarter of 2014, productivity increased 1.4 percent as output and hours worked rose 3.2 percent and 1.7 percent, respectively. (See table A.)

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses increased 4.2 percent in the first quarter of 2014, due to both the decline in productivity and a 2.4 percent increase in hourly compensation. Unit labor costs increased 0.9 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A and 2.)

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity increased 3.3 percent in the first quarter of 2014, as output increased 1.8 percent and hours worked decreased 1.4 percent. Productivity increased 3.6 percent in the durable goods sector and increased 2.5 percent in the nondurable goods sector. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 2.2 percent, as output increased 2.4 percent and hours increased 0.2 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing increased 0.1 percent in the first quarter of 2014 and declined 0.2 percent from the same quarter a year ago. (See tables A and 3.)

The concepts, sources, and methods used for the manufacturing output series differ from those used in the business and nonfarm business output series; these output measures are not directly comparable. See Technical Notes for a more detailed explanation.

Preliminary fourth quarter and annual 2013 measures were announced today for the nonfinancial corporate sector. Productivity increased 2.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2013 and was unchanged over the last four quarters. Annual average productivity was unchanged from 2012 to 2013. (See tables C and 6).

Revised measures

Revised measures of real hourly compensation for all sectors, from 2009 onward, reflect revisions in the consumer price series based on new and revised data from the BLS Office of Prices and Living Conditions. Output data for the manufacturing sector incorporate historically revised indexes of industrial production published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on March 28. These revisions affected quarterly manufacturing output, productivity, and unit labor cost measures for the data series beginning in 1987 and recent annual measures. Full historical annual and quarterly measures are available on the labor productivity and costs home page: www.bls.gov/lpc/#data.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, nonfarm business sector productivity increased 2.3 percent, which is a larger increase than reported March 6; this revision is due to both an upward revision to output and a downward revision to hours. Unit labor costs fell 0.4 percent, a larger decline than previously reported. Manufacturing sector productivity rose 1.3 percent in the fourth quarter, the same rate as was previously reported. Unit labor costs in the manufacturing sector rose 0.1 percent, rather than falling 0.1 percent as reported March 6. (See table B.)

2013 Annual Average measures for productivity and unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector were unrevised from the March 6 release. In the manufacturing sector, an upward revision to output led to an upward revision to productivity and a downward revision to unit labor costs. (See table B.)

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y Q to Q Y to Y

Sector Nonfarm Durable Nondurable Business Business Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous Revised Previous

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2013

Percent change, annual average 2013

Percent change, annual rate, fourth quarter 2013

Percent change, annual average 2013

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 7, 2014.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 7, 2014Publication referenceMay 7, 201430 days laterJun 6, 2014
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.41%Observed 4.29%Observed −12 bps vs. earlier reference4.14%Observed −15 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 7, 2014 – Aug 7, 2014
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 7, 2014Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.25%4.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.28% · Feb 13, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.33% · Feb 20, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Feb 27, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.28% · Mar 6, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Mar 13, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Mar 20, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Mar 27, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.41% · Apr 3, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.34% · Apr 10, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.27% · Apr 17, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.33% · Apr 24, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.29% · May 1, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.21% · May 8, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.20% · May 15, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.14% · May 22, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · May 29, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.14% · Jun 5, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.20% · Jun 12, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.17% · Jun 19, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.14% · Jun 26, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Jul 3, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.15% · Jul 10, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.13% · Jul 17, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.13% · Jul 24, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Jul 31, 201430-year fixed mortgage: 4.14% · Aug 7, 2014Feb 7, 2014May 7, 2014Aug 7, 2014
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,482.85/month

4.29% · May 1, 2014

At the later reference$1,456.56/month

4.14% · Jun 5, 2014

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $26.29 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →