Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2007 Third Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2007. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2007, revised

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2007. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity growth in the third quarter were:

6.7 percent in the business sector and 6.3 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, changes in productivity are higher than the preliminary estimates published November 7, and represent the largest productivity gains since the third quarter of 2003. The upward revisions to productivity resulted from upward revisions to output--which grew 5.7 percent in both sectors--and small downward revisions to hours, which fell 1.0 percent in the business sector and 0.6 percent in the nonfarm business sector in the third quarter.

In manufacturing, revised productivity increases in the third quarter were:

5.0 percent in manufacturing, 6.1 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 4.3 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Productivity growth in the manufacturing sector was revised up, reflecting a small upward revision to output and a smaller downward revision to hours (table C). Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 12 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Third-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

Business sector productivity grew at an annual rate of 6.7 percent during the third quarter of 2007, the largest gain since a 9.1 percent increase in the third quarter of 2003 (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Output rose 5.7 percent, the largest increase since a 10.4 percent rise in the third quarter of 2003. Hours of all persons engaged in the sector fell 1.0 percent, the first decline in the series since the second quarter of 2003, when hours fell 2.2 percent. When the third quarter of 2007 is compared to the third quarter of 2006, productivity rose 2.9 percent. This is the largest four-quarter increase since output per hour grew 3.4 percent from the second quarter of 2003 to the second quarter of 2004.

Hourly compensation in the business sector increased 4.7 percent during the third quarter of 2007. A downward revision reduced hourly compensation growth to 2.4 percent in the second quarter, lower than the 5.8 percent increase reported on November 7. From the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007, hourly compensation increased 5.9 percent, the largest four-quarter gain since an increase of 6.7 percent from the fourth quarter of 1999 to the fourth quarter of 2000. Hourly compensation includes accrued wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, grew 2.7 percent in the third quarter and fell 3.3 percent in the second quarter.

Unit labor costs fell 2.0 percent in the third quarter of 2007, a larger decline than previously reported, reflecting the upward revision to productivity and the downward revision to hourly compensation. In the second quarter, unit labor costs declined 1.1 percent, in contrast to the 2.2 percent increase reported on Nov. 7. The implicit price deflator for the business sector, which reflects changes both in unit labor costs and in unit nonlabor payments, grew 0.2 percent in the third quarter of 2007.

Nonfarm business

Output per hour of all persons in the nonfarm business sector rose 6.3 percent during the third quarter of 2007, the largest gain since a 10.4 percent increase in the third quarter of 2003. Output increased 5.7 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector declined 0.6 percent, as revised. Hours growth was the lowest since the second quarter of 2003, when hours fell 1.3 percent. In the second quarter of 2007, productivity had increased 2.2 percent, reflecting gains of 4.2 percent in output and 2.0 percent in hours.

Hourly compensation in the nonfarm business sector rose 4.2 percent in the third quarter of 2007. After a downward revision, second-quarter hourly compensation increased 1.0 percent; lower than a 4.4 percent rise reported on November 7. From the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007, hourly compensation increased 5.8 percent, the largest four-quarter gain since an increase of 6.5 percent from the fourth quarter of 1999 to the fourth quarter of 2000. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 2.3 percent in the third quarter of 2007 and fell 4.7 percent in the second quarter.

As in the business sector, nonfarm business unit labor costs decreased 2.0 percent in the third quarter of 2007 due to the upward revision to productivity and the downward revision to hourly compensation. Nonfarm business unit labor costs also declined 1.1 percent in the second quarter. The implicit price deflator for the nonfarm business sector, which reflects changes both in unit labor costs and in unit nonlabor payments, edged down 0.1 percent in the third quarter of 2007.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 5.0 percent in manufacturing in the third quarter of 2007, as output increased 4.5 percent and hours of all persons decreased 0.5 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). When the third quarter of 2007 is compared with the third quarter of 2006, productivity increased 2.8 percent, less than during any four-quarter period since the period ending with the fourth quarter of 2004, when productivity also increased 2.8 percent. In durable goods industries, productivity increased 6.1 percent in the third quarter of 2007. Output grew 6.7 percent and hours rose 0.6 percent. Productivity grew more slowly in the nondurable goods industries, 4.3 percent, reflecting an increase of 1.9 percent in output and a decrease of 2.3 percent in hours (tables 3, 4, and 5).

The average hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers rose 1.5 percent in the third quarter of 2007. Hourly compensation was revised down substantially in the second quarter, from the 3.7 percent increase reported previously to a 1.4 percent decrease. In durable goods industries, hourly compensation increased 0.7 percent in the third quarter, compared with a 3.0 percent rise in nondurable goods manufacturing. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation for all manufacturing workers declined 0.3 percent in the third quarter of 2007.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 3.3 percent in the third quarter of 2007 and fell 3.7 percent in the second quarter, as revised. Unit labor costs declined 5.1 percent in durable goods industries and fell 1.3 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing during the third quarter.

Nonfinancial Corporations

Third-quarter 2007 measures of productivity and costs also were released for nonfinancial corporations (tables B and 6). Output per all-employee hour grew at a 4.2 percent annual rate. This was the largest increase since the third quarter of 2004 when productivity increased 5.2 percent. Output increased 4.7 percent in the third quarter of 2007, and hours of all employees rose 0.5 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The nonfinancial corporate sector includes all corporations doing business in the United States, except those classified as depository institutions, nondepository institutions, security and commodity brokers, insurance carriers, regulated investment offices, small business investment offices, and real estate investment trusts.

Hourly compensation in nonfinancial corporations rose 4.4 percent in the third quarter. When consumer prices are taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 2.5 percent in the third quarter, a reversal from the 3.5 percent decrease in the second quarter, as revised.

In the nonfinancial corporate sector, unit labor costs increased 0.2 percent, unit nonlabor costs declined by 1.8 percent, and unit profits fell 10.1 percent in the third quarter of 2007 (seasonally adjusted annual rates). As a result of these movements, the implicit price deflator for the output of nonfinancial corporations--which reflects a weighted average of these three measures--fell 1.5 percent.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the second and third quarters of 2007 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. In the third quarter, productivity in the business and nonfarm business sectors was higher than reported Nov. 7, due to 1.4 percentage point upward revisions to output and 0.1 percentage point downward revisions to hours. In manufacturing, productivity was also revised up--by 0.4 percentage point--due to a small upward revision to output and a small downward revision to hours. Hourly compensation was revised down in all three sectors, and the combination of faster productivity growth and slower hourly compensation growth led to downward revisions to unit labor costs in the third quarter.

Third quarter 2007

Second quarter 2007

The second-quarter 2007 measures of hourly compensation, real hourly compensation, and unit labor costs were revised to reflect new information on employee compensation reported by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce on Nov. 29. In both the business and nonfarm business sectors, hourly compensation growth was revised down by 3.4 percentage points. Because productivity was not revised, the hourly compensation revisions caused corresponding downward revisions to unit labor costs, which now decline rather than increase in the second quarter.

In the manufacturing sector, hourly compensation was revised down by 5.1 percentage points in the second quarter. As a result, manufacturing unit labor costs, which had been reported as rising at a 1.3 percent annual rate, actually fell 3.7 percent in the second quarter.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial corporations

Measures for the nonfinancial corporate sector also were revised to reflect updated information on output and employee compensation during the second quarter of 2007 (table D). Productivity was revised down along with output, as hours grew at the same rate reported Nov 7. Hourly compensation was revised down from a 4.9-percent gain to a 2.3-percent increase during the second quarter. Because hourly compensation was revised down more than productivity, the increase in unit labor costs was also revised down, from 1.1 percent to 0.2 percent.

Second quarter 2007

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Dec 5, 2007.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierNov 5, 2007Publication referenceDec 5, 200730 days laterJan 4, 2008
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.26%Observed 6.10%Observed −16 bps vs. earlier reference6.07%Observed −3 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Sep 5, 2007 – Mar 5, 2008
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Dec 5, 2007Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.00%5.75%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.46% · Sep 6, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Sep 13, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Sep 20, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.42% · Sep 27, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.37% · Oct 4, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.40% · Oct 11, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.40% · Oct 18, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.33% · Oct 25, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.26% · Nov 1, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Nov 8, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Nov 15, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.20% · Nov 21, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.10% · Nov 29, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 5.96% · Dec 6, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Dec 13, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.14% · Dec 20, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.17% · Dec 27, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.07% · Jan 3, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 5.87% · Jan 10, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 5.69% · Jan 17, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 5.48% · Jan 24, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 5.68% · Jan 31, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Feb 7, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 5.72% · Feb 14, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 6.04% · Feb 21, 200830-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Feb 28, 2008Sep 5, 2007Dec 5, 2007Mar 5, 2008
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,817.98/month

6.10% · Nov 29, 2007

At the later reference$1,812.18/month

6.07% · Jan 3, 2008

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $5.81 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →