Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2006 Third Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2006. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2006, preliminary

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2006. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity growth in the third quarter were:

0.1 percent in the business sector and 0.0 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

Productivity increased 0.1 percent in the business sector, as both output and hours grew 1.4 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Nonfarm business productivity remained unchanged as output and hours both increased 1.6 percent (table A).

In manufacturing, productivity increases in the third quarter were:

5.9 percent in manufacturing, 8.6 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 2.0 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The 5.9-percent increase in manufacturing productivity reflected increases of 8.6 percent in durable goods manufacturing and 2.0 percent in the nondurable goods sector. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 13 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Third-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the second quarter to the third quarter of 2006 productivity in the business sector grew at a 0.1 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate. Both output and hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased at the same 1.4 percent annual rate. The third-quarter productivity increase was slower than the 1.1-percent gain recorded in the second quarter of 2006 (as revised), which reflected a 2.7-percent rise in output and a 1.7-percent increase in hours. (tables B and 1).

Hourly compensation in the business sector increased at an annual rate of 4.0 percent during the third quarter of 2006, slower than the 6.4-percent rise one quarter earlier (as revised). This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, rose by 1.0 percent in the third quarter of 2006 and 1.3 percent in the second quarter.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, rose 4.0 percent during the third quarter of 2006. This measure had increased 5.3 percent in the second quarter. The implicit price deflator for business sector output increased 1.3 percent during the third quarter of 2006, following a 3.1 percent increase in the previous quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector remained unchanged during the third quarter of 2006. Output grew at a 1.6 percent annual rate. Hours of all persons in the nonfarm business sector also increased 1.6 percent, reflecting 0.8-percent gains in both employment and average weekly hours at work. In the second quarter, nonfarm business productivity increased 1.2 percent, as output grew 2.7 percent and hours worked rose by 1.5 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.7 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2006. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 0.7 percent during the July-September period. During the second quarter of 2006, real hourly compensation had increased 1.6 percent.

Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector grew 3.8 percent during the third quarter of 2006, after rising 5.4 percent in the second quarter. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 1.0 percent in the third quarter of 2006.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 5.9 percent in manufacturing in the third quarter of 2006, as output grew 4.2 percent and hours of all persons fell 1.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This was the largest quarterly gain in productivity since the third quarter of 2003, when output per hour increased 8.6 percent. In durable goods industries, productivity grew 8.6 percent in the third quarter as output grew 5.3 percent and hours of all persons fell 3.0 percent. Productivity increased 2.0 percent in nondurable goods, reflecting increases in output and hours of 3.0 percent and 0.9 percent, respectively (tables 3, 4, and 5).

The hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 2.9 percent during the third quarter of 2006, as a 4.8-percent gain in the durable goods subsector was partially offset by a 0.6 percent decline in nondurable goods industries. Hourly compensation in total manufacturing had increased 4.0 percent in the second quarter. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation declined 0.1 percent in the third quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 2.9 percent in the third quarter of 2006, reflecting declines of 3.5 percent in durable goods industries and 2.5 percent in nondurable goods industries. These costs had increased 1.2 percent in the previous quarter.

Revised Measures

Revised and previous measures for the second quarter of 2006 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. In both the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity was revised down along with output, as hours increased at the same rate reported Sept. 6. Unit labor costs increased more in both sectors during the second quarter than previously reported.

In the manufacturing sector, productivity was revised up slightly due to a small downward revision to hours, as the increase in output was not revised. Hours worked during the second quarter in all sectors now reflect more current data on the ratio of hours worked to hours paid in private nonfarm businesses.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for nonfinancial corporations for the second quarter of 2006 also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on Sept. 6.

Second quarter 2006

Productivity rose 0.2 percent in the second quarter of 2006, compared with the preliminary estimate of a 2.2 percent increase. This was the result of a downward revision in output growth, from 3.8 percent to 1.8 percent. Hours growth was unchanged. Unit labor costs increased faster than previously reported, as productivity was revised down and hourly compensation was not revised. Unit profits fell more than reported on Sept. 6. (tables C and 6).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 2, 2006.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 3, 2006Publication referenceNov 2, 200630 days laterDec 2, 2006
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.31%Observed 6.31%Observed Unchanged vs. earlier reference6.14%Observed −17 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 2, 2006 – Feb 2, 2007
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 2, 2006Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.00%6.50%7.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.63% · Aug 3, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.55% · Aug 10, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.52% · Aug 17, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.48% · Aug 24, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.44% · Aug 31, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.47% · Sep 7, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.43% · Sep 14, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.40% · Sep 21, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Sep 28, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.30% · Oct 5, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.37% · Oct 12, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.36% · Oct 19, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.40% · Oct 26, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Nov 2, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.33% · Nov 9, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Nov 16, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Nov 22, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.14% · Nov 30, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Dec 7, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.12% · Dec 14, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Dec 21, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Dec 28, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Jan 4, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.21% · Jan 11, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.23% · Jan 18, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.25% · Jan 25, 200730-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Feb 1, 2007Aug 2, 2006Nov 2, 2006Feb 2, 2007
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,858.87/month

6.31% · Nov 2, 2006

At the later reference$1,825.74/month

6.14% · Nov 30, 2006

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $33.13 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →