Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2006 First Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2006. The revised seasonally adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2006, revised

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2006. The revised seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the first quarter were:

3.9 percent in the business sector and 3.7 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, the first-quarter productivity gains were larger than the preliminary estimates reported on May 4.

In manufacturing, the revised productivity changes in the first quarter were:

3.8 percent in manufacturing, 3.5 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 3.7 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Manufacturing productivity growth was slower in the first quarter of 2006 than reported on May 4, reflecting downward revisions to output per hour in both durable goods and nondurable goods industries. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 13 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. First-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

Productivity increased 3.9 percent in the business sector from the fourth quarter of 2005 to the first quarter of 2006, as output increased 6.4 percent and hours worked by all persons grew 2.4 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Productivity had increased 0.2 percent in the previous quarter, reflecting increases in output and hours of 1.8 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 5.4 percent during the first quarter of 2006, after declining 0.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005, as revised (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This measure of compensation includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, rose by 3.3 percent in the first quarter of 2006, rebounding from a 3.8-percent drop in the previous quarter.

The change in unit labor costs approximates the change in hourly compensation less the change in productivity. In the first quarter of 2006, 5.4-percent growth in hourly compensation and 3.9-percent growth in productivity yielded a 1.5-percent rise in unit labor costs. Unit labor costs declined 0.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005, as revised. The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in both unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, grew by 2.8 percent in the first quarter of 2006.

Nonfarm business

Productivity rose 3.7 percent in the nonfarm business sector during the first quarter of 2006, as output increased 6.5 percent and hours of all persons increased 2.7 percent (table 2). The hours increase was larger than during any quarter in 2005. In fourth-quarter 2005, nonfarm productivity had declined 0.3 percent as output rose 1.5 percent and hours increased 1.8 percent.

Hourly compensation increased 5.3 percent in the first quarter of 2006. After revision, this measure decreased at a 0.9 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2005--the first decline in nonfarm hourly compensation since 1994, when it fell 0.8 percent in the second quarter and 0.3 percent in the third quarter. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 3.2 in the first quarter and fell 4.1 percent in the fourth quarter.

Unit labor costs grew 1.6 percent during the first quarter of 2006, following a 0.6-percent decline in the fourth quarter of 2005, as revised. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose by 2.9 percent in the first quarter of 2006.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 3.8 percent in manufacturing during the first quarter of 2006, reflecting similar performance in the durable and nondurable manufacturing subsectors. In durable goods industries, productivity rose 3.5 percent, as output grew 5.2 percent and hours rose 1.6 percent. In nondurable goods industries, productivity grew 3.7 percent, as output increased 6.7 percent and hours rose 2.9 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation in manufacturing rose 1.9 percent during the first quarter, reflecting increases of 2.7 percent in the hourly compensation of persons in durable goods industries and 0.5 percent in the hourly compensation of workers in nondurable goods industries. Real hourly compensation, which takes account of changes in consumer prices, declined 0.2 percent for all manufacturing workers, as a 0.6-percent rise in durable manufacturing real hourly compensation was eclipsed by a 1.6-percent drop in the nondurable goods industries.

Unit labor costs fell 1.9 percent in manufacturing during the first quarter of 2006. In nondurable goods industries, productivity grew much faster than hourly compensation, and unit labor costs fell 3.1 percent. In durable goods industries, where hourly compensation increased faster than in nondurable manufacturing, unit labor costs declined only 0.9 percent.

Nonfinancial corporations

Preliminary first-quarter 2006 measures of productivity and costs for nonfinancial corporations also were announced today (tables B and 6). Productivity rose 3.7 percent in the first quarter, as output increased 5.8 percent and employee-hours rose 2.0 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). As revised, productivity had increased at a 2.4-percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2005, as output grew 5.0 percent and employee-hours rose 2.5 percent. The nonfinancial corporate sector includes all corporations doing business in the United States, except those classified as depository institutions, nondepository institutions, security and commodity brokers, insurance carriers, regulated investment offices, small business investment offices, and real estate investment trusts.

Hourly compensation rose 5.0 percent during the first quarter of 2006, following a 0.8-percent decrease in the fourth quarter of 2005. As in the larger business sector, the fourth-quarter decline was the first since the third quarter of 1994 (0.2 percent). When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation increased 2.9 percent in the first quarter of 2006, and fell 4.0 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005. Unit labor costs in nonfinancial corporations rose 1.3 percent in the first quarter, after falling 3.2 percent one quarter earlier.

REVISED MEASURES

Previous and revised measures for the first quarter of 2006 in the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. Productivity growth was revised up in the business and nonfarm business sectors from the preliminary estimates reported May 4, as output was revised up more than hours. In manufacturing, hours were revised up more than output, and productivity was revised down. Hourly compensation and real hourly compensation were revised down in all sectors for the first quarter of 2006. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, upward revisions to productivity and downward revisions to hourly compensation both contributed to slower first-quarter growth in unit labor costs than reported May 4. In manufacturing, because compensation per hour was revised down more than output per hour, unit labor costs fell slightly faster during the first quarter than previously reported.

In the fourth quarter of 2005, hourly compensation declined in all sectors, rather than increasing as reported May 4. Unit labor costs declined rather than increasing in the business and nonfarm business sectors, and fell faster in manufacturing than initially reported. For the year 2005, hourly compensation, real hourly compensation, and unit labor costs increased somewhat less in all sectors than in the preliminary estimates.

REVISED MEASURES: NONFINANCIAL CORPORATIONS

Fourth quarter and annual average 2005 measures also were revised for the nonfinancial corporate sector. In the fourth quarter of 2005, output and productivity were revised down substantially, and productivity rose 2.4 percent. Hourly compensation was revised down by more than productivity so unit labor costs fell faster than reported May 4, based on information then available. For the year 2005, productivity growth was revised down slightly to 4.9 percent. The increase in hourly compensation was revised down more than productivity--from 5.6 percent to 5.3 percent--and unit labor costs were revised down 0.1 percent.

Fourth quarter 2005

Annual average 2005

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jun 1, 2006.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierMay 2, 2006Publication referenceJun 1, 200630 days laterJul 1, 2006
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.58%Observed 6.67%Observed +9 bps vs. earlier reference6.78%Observed +11 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Mar 1, 2006 – Sep 1, 2006
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jun 1, 2006Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.00%6.50%7.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Mar 2, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.37% · Mar 9, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Mar 16, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.32% · Mar 23, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.35% · Mar 30, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.43% · Apr 6, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.49% · Apr 13, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.53% · Apr 20, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.58% · Apr 27, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.59% · May 4, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.58% · May 11, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.60% · May 18, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.62% · May 25, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.67% · Jun 1, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.62% · Jun 8, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.63% · Jun 15, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Jun 22, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.78% · Jun 29, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.79% · Jul 6, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.74% · Jul 13, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.80% · Jul 20, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.72% · Jul 27, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.63% · Aug 3, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.55% · Aug 10, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.52% · Aug 17, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.48% · Aug 24, 200630-year fixed mortgage: 6.44% · Aug 31, 2006Mar 1, 2006Jun 1, 2006Sep 1, 2006
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,929.87/month

6.67% · Jun 1, 2006

At the later reference$1,951.78/month

6.78% · Jun 29, 2006

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $21.91 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →