Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2004 Third Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2004. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2004, preliminary

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2004. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity growth in the third quarter were:

2.3 percent in the business sector and 1.9 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

Productivity increased 2.3 percent in the business sector, as output grew 4.2 percent and hours increased 1.9 percent. The 1.9-percent rise in nonfarm business productivity occurred as output rose 4.1 percent and hours rose 2.1 percent (table A).

In manufacturing, productivity increases in the third quarter were:

4.3 percent in manufacturing, 5.0 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 4.3 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The third-quarter increase in manufacturing productivity is much lower than the 8.3-percent rise reported for the previous quarter (as revised). Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 13 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Third-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the second quarter to the third quarter of 2004, productivity in the business sector grew at a 2.3 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate. Output increased 4.2 percent, while hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased 1.9 percent. After revisions, productivity in the business sector rose 2.9 percent in the second quarter of 2004, reflecting a 3.9- percent rise in output and a 1.0-percent rise in hours (tables B and 1).

Hourly compensation in the business sector increased at an annual rate of 3.8 percent during the third quarter of 2004, more slowly than the 4.3- percent rise one quarter earlier (revised). This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, grew by 2.0 percent in the third quarter of 2004 after falling by 0.4 percent in the second quarter and 0.8 percent in the first quarter of the year.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, rose 1.5 percent during the third quarter, about the same rate of increase as the 1.4-percent growth in the second quarter. The implicit price deflator for the business sector increased 0.9 percent during the third quarter of 2004, following a 3.3 percent increase in the previous quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector grew at a 1.9-percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2004. Output grew 4.1 percent in the third quarter and hours worked in the nonfarm business sector rose 2.1 percent, reflecting a 1.7-percent gain in employment and a 0.4-percent increase in average weekly hours at work. Nonfarm business productivity increased 3.9 percent in the second quarter of 2004 (revised), as output grew 4.2 percent and hours rose by 0.3 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.6 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2004. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 1.7 percent during the July-September period. During the second quarter of 2004, real hourly compensation had risen 0.2 percent.

Unit labor costs grew 1.6 percent during the third quarter of 2004. In the second quarter, unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector had risen 1.0 percent. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 1.6 percent in the third quarter of 2004.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 4.3 percent in manufacturing in the third quarter of 2004, as output grew 4.0 percent and hours of all persons fell 0.3 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In durable goods, productivity grew 5.0 percent in the third quarter as output increased 6.3 percent and hours of all persons rose 1.3 percent. Productivity increased 4.3 percent in nondurable goods, as a modest output increase of 1.3 percent was combined with a decline of 2.8 percent in hours of all persons (tables 3, 4, and 5).

The hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased an average of 4.4 percent during the third quarter of 2004, reflecting increases of 3.9 percent in durable goods and 5.1 percent in nondurable goods. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation in total manufacturing rose 2.5 percent in the third quarter. Real hourly compensation had fallen in both of the previous quarters, 0.9 percent in the second quarter (as revised) and 7.4 percent in the first quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing edged up by 0.1 percent in the third quarter of 2004, after falling in three of the previous four quarters. In the durable goods sector, unit labor costs in the third quarter fell 1.0 percent in the third quarter and in the nondurable goods sector, these costs rose 0.8 percent.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the first and second quarters of 2004 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. Hours data for the second quarter now reflect more current data on the ratio of hours worked to hours paid and updated information on the relative average weekly hours of supervisory (nonproduction) workers to nonsupervisory (production) workers in private nonfarm businesses.

In the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity grew more rapidly than reported on Sept. 2, based on information then available. In both sectors, the growth in output was revised up and the growth in hours was revised down. Hourly compensation was revised up in both sectors. Unit labor costs rose much less than reported earlier. Productivity also was revised up in the manufacturing sector, reflecting faster growth in output and a larger decline in hours than previously reported. Hourly compensation rose more rapidly in the second quarter than reported earlier. Because productivity was revised up more than hourly compensation, unit labor costs in manufacturing show more of a decline in the second quarter than reported on Sept. 2.

On Oct. 13, 2004, a notice regarding corrections to the data released on Sept. 2 was posted on the BLS web site. Data for the second quarter 2004 for business, nonfarm business, manufacturing, and nonfinancial corporations were not affected. The Productivity and Costs news release of Aug. 10, 2004, which included revisions to historical measures, also contained some incorrect data. For more information, see www.bls.gov/lpc/note09022004.htm

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for nonfinancial corporations for the second quarter of 2004 also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on Sept. 2.

Second quarter 2004

Productivity grew at an annual rate of 2.7 percent in second-quarter 2004, compared with the increase of 1.4 percent published Sept. 2. This was the combined result of both an upward revision in output growth, from 3.2 percent to 3.7 percent, and a downward revision to hours growth, from 1.8 to 0.9 percent. Hourly compensation was revised up. However, the upward revision to productivity more than offset the upward revision to hourly compensation, and unit labor costs grew more slowly than reported previously. Unit profits also grew more rapidly than reported on Sept. 2. (tables C and 6).

Upcoming change

Early in 2005, BLS will improve the way it uses data for farm workers, the nonfarm self employed, and nonfarm unpaid family workers in the productivity program by accounting for the effects of multiple jobholding.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 4, 2004.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 5, 2004Publication referenceNov 4, 200430 days laterDec 4, 2004
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.72%Observed 5.70%Observed −2 bps vs. earlier reference5.81%Observed +11 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 4, 2004 – Feb 4, 2005
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 4, 2004Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%5.75%6.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 5.99% · Aug 5, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Aug 12, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.81% · Aug 19, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Aug 26, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.77% · Sep 2, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.83% · Sep 9, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.75% · Sep 16, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.70% · Sep 23, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.72% · Sep 30, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Oct 7, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.74% · Oct 14, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.69% · Oct 21, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.64% · Oct 28, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.70% · Nov 4, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.76% · Nov 11, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.74% · Nov 18, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.72% · Nov 24, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.81% · Dec 2, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.71% · Dec 9, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.68% · Dec 16, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.75% · Dec 22, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.81% · Dec 29, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.77% · Jan 6, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.74% · Jan 13, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.67% · Jan 20, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.66% · Jan 27, 200530-year fixed mortgage: 5.63% · Feb 3, 2005Aug 4, 2004Nov 4, 2004Feb 4, 2005
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,741.20/month

5.70% · Nov 4, 2004

At the later reference$1,762.17/month

5.81% · Dec 2, 2004

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $20.97 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →