Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2003 Third Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2003. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Third Quarter 2003

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the third quarter of 2003. The preliminary seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity growth in the third quarter were:

7.4 percent in the business sector and 8.1 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

Productivity increased 7.4 percent in the business sector, as output grew 8.8 percent and hours increased 1.3 percent. The 8.1 percent increase in nonfarm business productivity also reflected an 8.8 percent growth in output, with a 0.7 percent rise in nonfarm business hours (table A).

In manufacturing, productivity increases in the third quarter were:

8.6 percent in manufacturing, 14.7 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 2.3 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The increase in manufacturing productivity compares with a 3.1-percent rise reported for the previous quarter (as revised). Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 15 percent of U.S. business sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. Third-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the second quarter to the third quarter of 2003, business sector productivity increased at a 7.4 percent annual rate. Output increased 8.8 percent, while hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased 1.3 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The output increase was the largest since the fourth quarter of 1992, when output grew at a 9.3 percent annual rate. After revisions, productivity in the business sector also rose 7.4 percent in the second quarter of 2003, reflecting a 4.5-percent rise in output and a 2.7-percent decline in hours (tables B and 1).

Hourly compensation in the business sector increased at an annual rate of 2.4 percent during the third quarter of 2003. Revised results show that hourly compensation increased 4.1 percent in the second quarter (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, edged up 0.1 percent in the third quarter of 2003.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, decreased at a 4.6-percent annual rate during the third quarter. These costs had decreased 3.1 percent in the second quarter of 2003 (as revised). The implicit price deflator for the business sector increased 1.8 percent during the third quarter of 2003, following a 1.0 percent increase in the previous quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity in the nonfarm business sector grew at an 8.1-percent annual rate during the third quarter of 2003. Output grew 8.8 percent in the third quarter, faster than at any time since the fourth quarter of 1992, when it increased 9.8 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Hours worked in the nonfarm business sector rose 0.7 percent, reflecting a 0.3-percent gain in employment combined with a 0.4-percent increase in average weekly hours at work. After revisions, nonfarm business productivity increased 7.0 percent in the second quarter of 2003, as output grew 4.6 percent and hours declined 2.2 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.1 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2003. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose at a 0.8-percent annual rate during the July- September period. During the second quarter of 2002, real hourly compensation had risen 3.0 percent.

Unit labor costs fell 4.6 percent during the third quarter of 2003. In the second quarter, unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector had decreased 3.2 percent. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 1.5 percent in the third quarter of 2003.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased 8.6 percent in manufacturing in the third quarter of 2003, as output grew 2.9 percent and hours of all persons fell 5.2 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Total manufacturing output had decreased in each of the previous three quarters. The 3.1 percent increase in labor productivity in the second quarter of 2003 reflected a 2.9-percent decrease in output and a 5.8-percent drop in hours. In durable goods, productivity grew 14.7 percent in the third quarter as output increased 7.8 percent and hours of all persons fell 6.0 percent. The gain in durable manufacturing output per hour was the largest since the first quarter of 1971, when it increased 15.1 percent. Productivity increased 2.3 percent in nondurable goods, as output declined 1.8 percent and hours of all persons fell 4.0 percent (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased an average of 4.3 percent during the third quarter of 2003, reflecting increases of 3.7 percent in durable goods and 5.3 percent in nondurable goods. When the increase in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation in total manufacturing rose 1.9 percent in the third quarter.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing decreased 4.0 percent in the third quarter of 2003, after increasing 1.9 percent in the second quarter. In the durable goods sector, unit labor costs in the third quarter fell 9.6 percent, the largest decline in these costs since the second quarter of 2000, when they dropped 13.0 percent. Unit labor costs rose 2.9 percent in the nondurable goods sector in the third quarter of 2003, about the same as the 2.7 percent rise one quarter earlier.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the first and second quarters of 2003 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table B. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, growth in output and productivity were slightly higher in the second quarter than reported on Sept. 4, based on information then available. In the manufacturing sector, output declined more, and productivity increased less, than previously reported. In the first quarter of 2003, growth in hourly compensation in all of these sectors was revised down, which resulted in smaller increases in unit labor costs.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Productivity and cost measures for nonfinancial corporations for the first and second quarters of 2003 also were revised to incorporate more recent information than was available on Sept. 4.

Productivity grew at an annual rate of 8.4 percent in second-quarter 2003, compared with the increase of 8.1 percent published Sept. 4. This was largely the result of an upward revision in output growth from 5.9 percent to 6.3 percent. Hourly compensation was revised down slightly, and unit labor costs fell more, 4.3 percent, than the 3.8-percent decline reported previously. Unit profits grew at a 61.6 percent annual rate in the second quarter of 2003, compared with the preliminary estimate of 55.5 percent. Nonfinancial corporate output, productivity, and hourly compensation grew less during the first quarter of 2003 than reported Sept. 4. Because hourly compensation was revised down more than productivity, unit labor costs were revised down as well (tables C and 6).

Second quarter 2003

First quarter 2003

Upcoming changes

In order to provide users with information on long-term productivity and cost trends reflecting the release of the revised national income and product accounts by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, on Dec. 10, 2003, revised historical measures of productivity and costs for all sectors will be prepared by the BLS. Revised data for the manufacturing and nonfinancial corporate sectors also will reflect conversion from the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification to the 2002 North American Industry Classification System. On Jan. 7, 2004, the BLS will post revised historical measures through the fourth quarter of 2002 on its web site http://www.bls.gov/lpc/ , but will not incorporate these data into the LABSTAT database at that time. In keeping with usual practices, revised data for the second and third quarters of 2003 will be reported in the "Productivity and Costs" release of Feb. 5, 2004, which also will include revised first-quarter 2003 data. All revised historical data will be incorporated into the LABSTAT database at the time of that release.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 6, 2003.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 7, 2003Publication referenceNov 6, 200330 days laterDec 6, 2003
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.77%Observed 5.94%Observed +17 bps vs. earlier reference6.02%Observed +8 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 6, 2003 – Feb 6, 2004
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 6, 2003Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.00%6.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Aug 8, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.24% · Aug 15, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.28% · Aug 22, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.32% · Aug 29, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.44% · Sep 5, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.16% · Sep 12, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.01% · Sep 19, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Sep 26, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.77% · Oct 3, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.95% · Oct 10, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Oct 17, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Oct 24, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Oct 31, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Nov 7, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.03% · Nov 14, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.83% · Nov 21, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.89% · Nov 28, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 6.02% · Dec 5, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.88% · Dec 12, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.82% · Dec 19, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.81% · Dec 26, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.85% · Dec 31, 200330-year fixed mortgage: 5.87% · Jan 8, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.66% · Jan 15, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.64% · Jan 22, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.68% · Jan 29, 200430-year fixed mortgage: 5.72% · Feb 5, 2004Aug 6, 2003Nov 6, 2003Feb 6, 2004
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,787.10/month

5.94% · Oct 31, 2003

At the later reference$1,802.51/month

6.02% · Dec 5, 2003

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $15.42 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →