Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2001 Fourth Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the fourth quarter and for the full year 2001. The seasonally adjusted…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the fourth quarter and for the full year 2001. The seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the fourth quarter and the annual average changes were:

Business sector 3.4 1.8 Nonfarm business sector 3.5 1.8

In the fourth quarter, productivity advanced 3.4 percent in the business sector as output declined 0.3 percent and hours worked fell 3.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the nonfarm business sector, productivity rose 3.5 percent as output decreased 0.4 percent and hours dropped 3.7 percent. On an annual average basis, productivity in both the business and nonfarm business sectors rose 1.8 percent in 2001. This was the smallest annual productivity gain since 1995, when output per hour increased 0.7 percent in business and 0.9 percent in nonfarm business. Fourth-quarter productivity and related measures are summarized in table A and annual average data in table B. Detailed information is presented in tables 1 through 5.

In the manufacturing sector, increases in productivity were:

Manufacturing sector 3.5 1.0 Durable goods manufacturing 2.3 0.5 Nondurable goods manufacturing 4.3 1.5

Manufacturing productivity grew 3.5 percent in the fourth quarter, reflecting a drop in output of 7.2 percent and a larger decline, 10.4 percent, in hours of all persons. On an annual average basis, output per hour in the manufacturing sector posted a 1.0-percent increase in 2001. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 16 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

THIRD-TO-FOURTH QUARTER CHANGES, 2001

Business

Productivity in the business sector grew 3.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001, reflecting a decline of 0.3 percent in output and a 3.6- percent decrease in hours of all persons engaged in the sector (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Hours fell faster in the fourth quarter than at any time since the first quarter of 1991, when they dropped 4.6 percent. Revised data for the third quarter of 2001 show that output per hour rose 0.7 percent as output decreased 2.3 percent and hours declined 2.9 percent.

Hourly compensation increased at a 2.3-percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2001, following a 3.3-percent increase one quarter earlier. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee-benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, grew at an annual rate of 2.7 percent during the fourth quarter of 2001. This measure rose 2.6 percent in the third quarter.

The unit labor cost measure, which relates compensation to output, decreased at a 1.1-percent annual rate during the fourth quarter. During the third quarter of 2001, unit labor costs had increased 2.6 percent. The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in both unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, declined 1.5 percent in fourth- quarter 2001.

Nonfarm business

In the nonfarm business sector, productivity increased 3.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001. Output declined 0.4 percent and hours of all persons--employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers--fell 3.7 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). Productivity increased 1.1 percent in the third quarter of 2001 (as revised), when output decreased 2.3 percent and hours dropped 3.4 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation in the nonfarm business sector rose 2.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001, following an increase of 3.7 percent in the third quarter. When the changes in consumer prices were taken into account, real hourly compensation increased 2.8 percent during the fourth quarter of 2001 and 3.0 percent one quarter earlier.

Unit labor costs decreased 1.1 percent in the fourth quarter, after increasing 2.6 percent in the third quarter of 2001. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output declined 0.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001, after increasing 1.7 percent one quarter earlier.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity grew at a 3.5-percent seasonally adjusted annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2001 as output fell 7.2 percent and hours fell further, 10.4 percent (table 3). The hours decline was the largest since the second quarter of 1982, when hours dropped 11.0 percent. In the third quarter, total manufacturing productivity increased 2.6 percent (as revised), reflecting a 4.9-percent fall in output and a 7.3-percent decrease in hours. In durable goods manufacturing, productivity rose 2.3 percent in the fourth quarter as output fell 10.3 percent and hours dropped 12.3 percent (table 4). Among nondurable goods manufacturers, productivity rose 4.3 percent in the fourth quarter, reflecting a 3.3-percent decline in output and a 7.3-percent drop in hours of all persons (table 5).

Average hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 2.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001, reflecting increases in hourly compensation of 3.6 percent in durable goods manufacturing and 1.4 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing. When the increase in consumer prices was taken into account, real hourly compensation in total manufacturing rose 3.0 percent.

Unit labor costs for the manufacturing sector declined 0.9 percent. In durable goods manufacturing, unit labor costs rose 1.3 percent. By contrast, unit labor costs of nondurable goods manufacturers fell 2.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001.

ANNUAL AVERAGE CHANGES, 2000-2001

Business

Business sector productivity increased 1.8 percent when the annual average for 2001 was compared with the annual average for 2000 (table B). Output increased 0.8 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector decreased 1.0 percent. Productivity had increased 3.4 percent in 2000, when output grew 4.6 percent and hours increased 1.1 percent.

Hourly compensation in the business sector increased 6.0 percent in 2001, following a 6.4-percent rise in 2000. Real hourly compensation increased 3.0 percent in both years. Unit labor costs increased 4.0 percent in 2001, compared with a 2.9-percent increase in the previous year. The implicit price deflator rose 1.8 percent in 2001 and 1.9 percent in 2000.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 1.8 percent in the nonfarm business sector during 2001, reflecting a 0.8-percent rise in output and a 0.9-percent decline in hours. During 2000, productivity had increased 3.3 percent in nonfarm business, as output grew 4.5 percent and hours of all persons increased 1.1 percent.

In 2001, hourly compensation increased 5.8 percent, following a 6.5 percent rise in 2000. When the increase in consumer prices was taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 2.8 percent in 2001 and 3.1 percent in 2000. Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector rose 3.9 percent in 2001, compared with a 3.1-percent increase one year earlier. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business rose 1.7 percent in 2001 and 2.0 percent in 2000.

Manufacturing

In manufacturing, labor productivity rose 1.0 percent in 2001, compared with a 6.1 percent increase in 2000. The small increase in 2001 occurred when output fell 4.3 percent and hours of all persons fell 5.3 percent (table B). There was a 0.5-percent increase in durable goods manufacturing productivity, where output fell 5.4 percent and hours fell 5.9 percent. A somewhat larger increase in productivity of 1.5 percent was posted in nondurable goods manufacturing, reflecting an output decrease of 2.9 percent and a drop of 4.4 percent in hours of all persons.

Hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 7.3 percent in 2001, following a 7.0-percent increase in 2000. Taking into account the rise in consumer prices, real hourly compensation in manufacturing rose 4.4 percent in 2001 and 3.5 percent in 2000.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing grew 6.2 percent in 2001. This was the largest annual increase since 1981, when these costs rose 8.9 percent. Unit labor costs in durable goods manufacturing increased 7.4 percent in 2001, compared with a 4.8 percent rise in unit labor costs in nondurable goods manufacturing.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the third quarter of 2001 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, output and productivity measures were lower than those published on Dec. 6; unit labor costs were higher. Output and productivity growth in the manufacturing sector were slightly higher than the figures published on Dec. 6.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Revised productivity and output measures for the third quarter for nonfinancial corporations also were announced today. Output decreased more and productivity increased less than reported on Dec. 6. The downward revision to productivity led to faster growth in unit labor costs than previously reported (table D).

Third quarter 2001

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 6, 2002.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 7, 2002Publication referenceFeb 6, 200230 days laterMar 8, 2002
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.14%Observed 7.02%Observed −12 bps vs. earlier reference6.87%Observed −15 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 6, 2001 – May 6, 2002
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 6, 2002Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.00%6.75%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.45% · Nov 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.51% · Nov 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.75% · Nov 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · Nov 30, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.84% · Dec 7, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Dec 14, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Dec 21, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.16% · Dec 28, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Jan 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.06% · Jan 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.83% · Jan 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Jan 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · Feb 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.88% · Feb 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.86% · Feb 15, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.81% · Feb 22, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.80% · Mar 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.87% · Mar 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Mar 15, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Mar 22, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.18% · Mar 29, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.13% · Apr 5, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.99% · Apr 12, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Apr 19, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.88% · Apr 26, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.78% · May 3, 2002Nov 6, 2001Feb 6, 2002May 6, 2002
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,999.94/month

7.02% · Feb 1, 2002

At the later reference$1,969.78/month

6.87% · Mar 8, 2002

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $30.15 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →