Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

2001 First Quarter (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2001. The revised seasonally adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 2001

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 2001. The revised seasonally adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the first quarter were:

-1.4 percent in the business sector, and -1.2 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, the first-quarter productivity gains were lower than those reported initially on May 8. (These data do not reflect the employment benchmark of the BLS Current Employment Statistics data released on June 1.)

In manufacturing, the revised productivity changes in the first quarter were: -2.1 percent in manufacturing, -2.4 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and -2.0 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The declines in manufacturing productivity reflected decreases in output that were larger than the corresponding decreases in hours worked. The productivity decline in manufacturing was the first recorded since the third quarter of 1993, when it fell 0.6 percent. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 16 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. First-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

Business

From the fourth quarter of 2000 to the first quarter of 2001, business productivity decreased 1.4 percent, reflecting increases of 1.0 percent in output and 2.4 percent in hours of all persons (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This was the largest decline in output per hour since the first quarter of 1993, when it fell 4.7 percent. During the fourth quarter of 2000, productivity had increased 2.9 percent, when output rose 0.7 percent and hours fell 2.1 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 5.2 percent during the first quarter of 2001. This measure of compensation includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 1.0 percent in the first quarter.

Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, increased 6.7 percent during the first quarter. The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in both unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased 2.8 percent in the first quarter.

Nonfarm business

Productivity fell 1.2 percent in the nonfarm business sector during the first quarter of 2001, reflecting a 1.0-percent rise in output and a 2.2- percent increase in hours of all persons. In the fourth quarter of 2000, nonfarm business productivity grew 2.0 percent, as output rose 0.8 percent and hours decreased 1.3 percent (table 2).

The first-quarter 2001 increase in hourly compensation, 5.1 percent, was smaller than the 6.6-percent increase reported for the fourth quarter of 2000. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, there was a 0.9-percent gain in real hourly compensation in the first quarter of 2001.

The 6.3-percent increase in unit labor costs during the first quarter was the largest posted since the fourth quarter of 1990, when unit labor costs rose 6.8 percent. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 2.6 percent in the first quarter of 2001.

Manufacturing

Productivity fell 2.1 percent in manufacturing in the first quarter of 2001, as output dropped 7.8 percent and hours of all persons declined 5.8 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). This was the largest decline in labor productivity in the manufacturing sector since the third quarter of 1989, when it fell 3.2 percent. In durable goods industries, productivity fell 2.4 percent in the first quarter of 2001. This reflected a large decrease in output, 9.3 percent, and a decline of 7.1 percent in hours of all persons. In nondurable goods industries, productivity fell 2.0 percent as output and hours dropped 5.8 and 3.8 percent, respectively (tables 3, 4, and 5).

Hourly compensation in manufacturing rose 4.7 percent during the first quarter. This increase reflects a rise of 4.0 percent in the hourly compensation of persons in durable goods industries and a larger increase, 6.4 percent, in the hourly compensation of workers in nondurable goods industries. Real hourly compensation, which takes account of changes in consumer prices, rose 0.5 percent for all manufacturing workers.

The combination of a 2.1-percent drop in manufacturing productivity and a 4.7-percent increase in hourly compensation in the first quarter caused unit labor costs in manufacturing to rise 7.0 percent. The last time unit labor costs rose this much in one quarter was in the first quarter of 1991, when they rose 7.2 percent. Unit labor costs rose in both parts of manufacturing in the first quarter of 2001. In durable goods industries, they rose 6.5 percent, and, in nondurable goods industries, they rose even more, 8.6 percent.

Nonfinancial corporations

Preliminary first-quarter 2001 measures of productivity and costs for nonfinancial corporations also were announced today (tables B and 6). Productivity dropped slightly, 0.1 percent, in the first quarter, as output increased 0.4 percent and employee-hours grew 0.5 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). The last time productivity fell in the nonfinancial corporate sector was the first quarter of 1997, when it dropped 3.1 percent. Nonfinancial corporations include all corporations doing business in the United States, except banks, stock and commodity brokers, and finance and insurance agencies.

Hourly compensation increased 5.9 percent during the first quarter of 2001, down from a 7.4-percent rise in the previous quarter. When the rise in consumer prices is taken into account, real hourly compensation rose 1.7 percent in the first quarter. Unit labor costs in nonfinancial corporations rose 6.0 percent in the first quarter, less than the 7.1-percent rise one quarter earlier.

Unit profits fell 16.2 percent in first-quarter 2001 and 38.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2000. They have fallen in 9 of the last 14 quarters. The implicit price deflator for nonfinancial corporate output rose 1.9 percent in the first quarter of 2001.

REVISED MEASURES

Current and previous measures for the first quarter of 2001 for business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing are compared in table C. In the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors, output and productivity were revised down from the data reported on May 8, based on information then available. As a result, unit labor costs were revised upward.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jun 5, 2001.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierMay 6, 2001Publication referenceJun 5, 200130 days laterJul 5, 2001
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.14%Observed 7.24%Observed +10 bps vs. earlier reference7.11%Observed −13 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Mar 5, 2001 – Sep 5, 2001
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jun 5, 2001Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.97% · Mar 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Mar 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Mar 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Mar 30, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Apr 6, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.04% · Apr 13, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Apr 20, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.12% · Apr 27, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 4, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.10% · May 11, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 18, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.20% · May 25, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.24% · Jun 1, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.20% · Jun 8, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Jun 15, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Jun 22, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Jun 29, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · Jul 6, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.21% · Jul 13, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Jul 20, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.03% · Jul 27, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.00% · Aug 3, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.00% · Aug 10, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 17, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Aug 24, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 31, 2001Mar 5, 2001Jun 5, 2001Sep 5, 2001
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,044.49/month

7.24% · Jun 1, 2001

At the later reference$2,018.12/month

7.11% · Jun 29, 2001

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $26.38 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →