Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

1998 Fourth-Quarter and Annual Averages (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the fourth quarter and for the full year 1998. In the fourth quarter,…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the fourth quarter and for the full year 1998. In the fourth quarter, productivity advanced 3.9 percent in the business sector as output grew 6.6 percent and hours worked rose less--2.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the nonfarm business sector, productivity rose 3.7 percent as output increased 6.8 percent and hours grew 3.0 percent.

For the year 1998, the increases in productivity were higher than those posted in 1997 (as revised) in both the business and nonfarm business sectors. Fourth-quarter productivity and related measures are summarized in table A and annual data in table B. Detailed information is presented in tables 1 through 5.

In the manufacturing sector, increases in productivity were:

Manufacturing productivity grew at a 5.6 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter, reflecting an 8.4-percent increase in durable goods manufacturing and a 2.2-percent increase in nondurable goods. On an annual basis, manufacturing productivity increased 4.3 percent in 1998--the third consecutive increase of more than four percent. (Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 17 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors.)

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

THIRD-TO-FOURTH QUARTER CHANGES, 1998

Business

Productivity in the business sector grew 3.9 percent in the fourth quarter of 1998, reflecting an increase of 6.6 percent in output combined with a 2.6 percent rise in the hours of all persons engaged in the sector. In the third quarter of 1998, productivity rose 2.6 percent (as revised) as output grew 4.0 percent and hours 1.4 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates).

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.9 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1998, similar to the 3.7 percent growth during the third quarter. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee-benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, increased at just a 0.1 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter. During the third quarter of 1998, unit labor costs rose 1.0 percent.

Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), rose at a 2.0 percent annual rate for persons in the business sector. This measure rose 1.8 percent during the third quarter.

The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in both unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased at an annual rate of 0.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 1998. This measure increased 0.5 percent in the third quarter.

Nonfarm business

In the nonfarm business sector, productivity increased 3.7 percent in the fourth quarter as output rose 6.8 percent and hours of all persons-- employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers--rose 3.0 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). As in the larger business sector, productivity grew faster in the fourth quarter than it had in the previous quarter. During the third quarter of 1998, nonfarm productivity rose 2.5 percent as output and hours increased 4.0 and 1.4 percent, respectively (table 2).

Hourly compensation in the nonfarm business sector rose 3.5 percent in the fourth quarter, and real hourly compensation increased 1.5 percent when the increase in the CPI-U was taken into account. During the third quarter, hourly compensation had increased by 3.9 percent, and real hourly compensation had risen 2.1 percent.

Unit labor costs fell 0.2 percent in the fourth quarter, after rising 1.4 percent in the previous quarter. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 0.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 1998, reflecting both the drop in unit labor costs and an increase in unit nonlabor payments.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity grew at a 5.6 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1998 as output rose 5.1 percent and hours fell 0.5 percent (table 3). A large productivity increase occurred in durable goods manufacturing, where productivity and output both rose 8.4 percent and hours were unchanged (table 4). Among nondurable goods manufacturers, productivity rose 2.2 percent in the fourth quarter as output increased 0.9 percent while hours dropped 1.2 percent (table 5). In the third quarter, total manufacturing productivity had risen 4.7 percent (as revised), reflecting a 0.4-percent rise in output and a 4.1 percent fall in hours of all persons working in the sector.

The average hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 3.2 percent in both the third and fourth quarters. When the increase in consumer prices was taken into account, real hourly compensation in both quarters rose 1.3 percent.

Since the fourth-quarter increase in manufacturing productivity outpaced the increase in hourly compensation, unit labor costs for the manufacturing sector fell 2.2 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing also had fallen in the previous quarter, 1.5 percent. Unit labor costs in the fourth quarter of 1998 fell 4.8 percent in durable goods manufacturing but rose 0.9 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing. Unit labor costs in durable goods manufacturing have risen in only 2 of the last 21 quarters (the fourth quarter of 1997, by 2.2 percent, and the first quarter of 1998, by 0.6 percent).

ANNUAL AVERAGE CHANGES, 1997-1998

Business

Business sector productivity increased 2.3 percent when the annual average for 1998 is compared with the annual average for 1997 (table B). Output rose 4.6 percent in 1998, and hours of all persons engaged in the sector grew 2.2 percent. The 1998 productivity increase was larger than the 1.5-percent rise posted in 1997 (as revised). Output increased 4.6 percent in both years, but business sector hours increased less in 1998 than in 1997, when hours rose 3.1 percent.

Hourly compensation in the business sector rose 4.3 percent in 1998, and real hourly compensation grew 2.7 percent. The increase in real hourly compensation was the largest since 1986, when it grew 3.3 percent. Unit labor costs rose 2.0 percent in 1998, about the same as the 2.1 percent increase in the previous year. The implicit price deflator rose 0.6 percent in 1998.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 2.2 percent in the nonfarm business sector during 1998 as output rose 4.6 percent and hours of all persons increased 2.4 percent. The increase in labor productivity in 1997, 1.2 percent, occurred as output and hours rose 4.5 and 3.2 percent, respectively.

In 1998, hourly compensation rose 4.2 percent, compared with a 3.5 percent increase in 1997. Real hourly compensation increased 2.6 percent in 1998. Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector grew 2.0 percent in 1998, slightly less than the 2.3-percent increase in 1997. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business rose 0.7 percent.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity grew 4.3 percent in 1998 as output rose 4.2 percent and hours of all persons fell slightly, 0.1 percent (table B). In durable goods manufacturing, productivity increased 6.8 percent in 1998, reflecting an output increase of 7.0 percent and an increase in hours of all persons of 0.2 percent. The 6.8-percent increase in labor productivity in durable goods was the largest recorded since 1971, when productivity rose 8.6 percent. A smaller increase in labor productivity in nondurable goods manufacturing in 1998, 1.2 percent, was the result of a 0.7 percent rise in output coupled with a drop, 0.5 percent, in hours of all persons.

Hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 4.5 percent in 1998, the largest increase since the 5.3-percent rise in 1991. Taking into account the rise in the CPI-U, real hourly compensation in manufacturing rose 2.9 percent in 1998. This increase was the largest since 1982, when real hourly compensation rose 3.3 percent. Average hourly compensation in nondurable goods manufacturing rose 5.1 percent in 1998, more than the 4.1 percent rise in durable goods manufacturing.

Unit labor costs in manufacturing rose 0.2 percent in 1998. This was the first annual increase in unit labor costs since 1993, when they rose 0.7 percent. Unit labor costs in durable goods manufacturing fell 2.5 percent in 1998. This marks the seventh consecutive drop in unit labor costs in this sector. In contrast, unit labor costs in nondurable goods have increased every year since 1992, when they fell 0.2 percent. In 1998, these costs rose 3.8 percent.

Revised Measures

Current and previous measures for the third quarter of 1998 for the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors are compared in table C. Productivity growth is lower, and unit labor costs correspondingly higher, than the figures published on Dec. 3, based on the information then available. For all three sectors, output trends were revised downward and hours trends were revised upward.

Productivity and cost measures were revised to reflect the results of the 1997 Hours at Work Survey, which are now available. This survey is used to adjust the number of hours for which private nonfarm employees are paid (as reported in the BLS Current Establishment Survey) to hours at the workplace. For 1997, these new results show that hours of all persons increased more than had originally been reported. In the nonfarm business sector, hours of all persons grew 3.2 percent in 1997 rather than 3.0 percent, as previously reported. All of the increase in the ratio of hours at work to hours paid occurred outside of the manufacturing sector, where hours of all persons rose 1.6 percent in the calendar year. This is down slightly from the 1.7-percent rise previously reported.

In manufacturing, rates of growth in productivity for 1994-96 were revised downward due to revisions in the output measures. Unit labor costs have been revised upward by comparable amounts. (See appendix tables 1-3.) Measures of productivity, output, and unit labor costs for manufacturing were revised back to 1988 to incorporate data from the 1992 input-output table released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. There also are small revisions to the manufacturing data for years prior to 1988. Data for all years now reflect more detailed benchmark input-output tables developed by the Office of Employment Projections of the BLS.

Revised measures: Nonfinancial Corporations

Revised productivity and cost measures for the third quarter for nonfinancial corporations also were announced today. Productivity growth was revised down as employee hours grew faster and output grew more slowly than originally reported on Dec. 3 (table D).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 9, 1999.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 10, 1999Publication referenceFeb 9, 199930 days laterMar 11, 1999
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.79%Observed 6.75%Observed −4 bps vs. earlier reference7.06%Observed +31 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 9, 1998 – May 9, 1999
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 9, 1999Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.93% · Nov 13, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.86% · Nov 20, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.78% · Nov 27, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Dec 4, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.69% · Dec 11, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.69% · Dec 18, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.77% · Dec 25, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.83% · Dec 31, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.79% · Jan 8, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.83% · Jan 15, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.78% · Jan 22, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.74% · Jan 29, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.75% · Feb 5, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.77% · Feb 12, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.82% · Feb 19, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Feb 26, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.06% · Mar 5, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Mar 12, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Mar 19, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Mar 26, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Apr 2, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Apr 9, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.87% · Apr 16, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.88% · Apr 23, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.93% · Apr 30, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · May 7, 1999Nov 9, 1998Feb 9, 1999May 9, 1999
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,945.79/month

6.75% · Feb 5, 1999

At the later reference$2,008.01/month

7.06% · Mar 5, 1999

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $62.22 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →