Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

1997 Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages (Revised Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised fourth-quarter seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change--as measured by output per hour of all persons--and revised annual changes for…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Fourth Quarter and Annual Averages, 1997

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised fourth-quarter seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change--as measured by output per hour of all persons--and revised annual changes for the full year 1997. In the fourth quarter, productivity rose in both the business and nonfarm business sectors by less than it had in the previous quarter. Percent changes in business and nonfarm business productivity were:

For the year 1997, productivity increases in both sectors were about the same as the 1996 increases. Fourth-quarter productivity and related measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5; the preliminary and revised fourth-quarter and annual data appear in table C.

In the manufacturing sector, increases in productivity were:

Manufacturing productivity rose at a 4.3 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter as output growth accelerated to 8.2 percent and hours of all persons grew 3.8 percent (table A). On an annual basis, manufacturing productivity rose 4.4 percent in 1997, the largest increase in a decade. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 18 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series, and these measures are not directly comparable. Output data for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect indexes of industrial production independently prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources.

THIRD-TO-FOURTH QUARTER CHANGES, 1997

Business

Business sector productivity rose at a 1.8 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1997 as output increased 5.0 percent and hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased 3.2 percent. The fourth-quarter increase in labor productivity was smaller than those posted in the previous two quarters. In the third quarter of 1997, labor productivity rose 3.5 percent as output increased 3.6 percent and hours of all persons grew 0.1 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation rose faster, 5.5 percent, during the fourth quarter of 1997 than it had in the previous quarter, when it grew 4.2 percent. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee-benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in both hourly compensation and productivity, increased at a 3.7 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter, after having increased only 0.7 percent in the third quarter.

Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), rose at a 3.4 percent annual rate for persons in the business sector. This was the largest quarterly increase in the series since a 5.0-percent rise was posted in the first quarter of 1992. Real hourly compensation rose 2.2 percent during the third quarter.

The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, rose 0.9 percent in the fourth quarter. This increase was down slightly from the 1.1 percent gain in the third quarter of 1997.

Nonfarm business

In the nonfarm business sector, productivity rose 1.6 percent at an annual rate in the fourth quarter as output rose 5.1 percent, and hours of all persons--employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers--rose 3.5 percent. During the third quarter, nonfarm productivity had increased 3.6 percent as output grew 3.7 percent and hours edged up 0.1 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation rose 5.2 percent in the fourth quarter, more rapidly than in the third quarter when it grew 3.8 percent. The fourth-quarter increase in hourly compensation in the nonfarm business sector was the largest since a 7.7-percent rise was posted in the first quarter of 1992. Real hourly compensation in the fourth quarter of 1997 increased 3.1 percent when the increase in the CPI-U was taken into account. During the third quarter, it had risen 1.8 percent.

Unit labor costs rose 3.5 percent in the fourth quarter, up from a 0.2- percent increase in the third quarter of 1997. The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business rose less in the fourth quarter, 1.0 percent, than it had one quarter earlier when it increased 1.2 percent.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity rose at a 4.3 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1997, down from an increase of 8.0 percent in the third quarter. Output in the fourth quarter rose 8.2 percent, and hours of all persons increased 3.8 percent. The fourth-quarter output increase was the largest since a 13.3-percent increase in the first quarter of 1984. In the third quarter, manufacturing output had grown 6.1 percent, but hours had dropped 1.7 percent (table 3). Productivity and output grew more rapidly in durable goods industries than in nondurable goods. In durable goods, productivity increased 6.3 percent in the fourth quarter as output rose 9.9 percent and hours of all persons grew 3.4 percent. In nondurable goods, output grew 5.6 percent and hours of all persons increased 4.2 percent, resulting in a productivity increase of 1.3 percent (tables 4 and 5).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 6.1 percent during the fourth quarter, up sharply from the 3.4 percent increase in the previous quarter. Hourly compensation rose 7.5 percent in durable goods industries and 3.9 percent in nondurable goods industries. When the increase in consumer prices was taken into account, real hourly compensation in manufacturing rose 3.9 percent in the fourth quarter and 1.5 percent in the third quarter.

Unit labor costs rose in the fourth quarter of 1997 by 1.8 percent, as hourly compensation in the manufacturing sector rose faster than labor productivity. Unit labor costs had dropped in the third quarter by 4.2 percent as productivity increases exceeded increases in hourly compensation. In durable goods, unit labor costs rose 1.1 percent in the fourth quarter after having dropped 7.8 percent in the previous quarter. Unit labor costs in durable goods industries had fallen in 15 of the last 17 quarters. In nondurable goods industries, unit labor costs rose 2.5 percent in the fourth quarter, more rapidly than the 0.2-percent rise one quarter earlier.

ANNUAL AVERAGE CHANGES, 1996-1997

Business

In calendar year 1997, business productivity increased 1.9 percent, after having increased 2.0 percent in the previous year (table 1). Output grew 4.5 percent in 1997 and 3.5 percent in 1996. The 1997 output increase was the largest since an 8.5-percent rise in 1984. Hours of all persons in the business sector rose 2.6 percent in 1997 and 1.4 percent in the previous year.

Hourly compensation increased 3.9 percent in both 1996 and 1997. Real hourly compensation also increased in both years--0.9 percent in 1996 and 1.6 percent in 1997. These were the first increases in real hourly compensation since 1992 when it rose 2.1 percent.

Unit labor costs increased 2.0 percent in 1997, up slightly from the 1.8- percent increase in the previous year. The implicit price deflator rose 1.7 percent in 1997 and 1.9 percent in 1996. These are the only increases of less than 2 percent in this series since the mid-1960s.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 1.7 percent in the nonfarm business sector during 1997, as output rose 4.5 percent and hours of all persons increased 2.7 per cent. In 1996, productivity rose 1.9 percent, output rose 3.5 percent, and hours of all persons grew 1.6 percent.

Hourly compensation grew 3.8 percent in both 1997 and 1996. However, because the increase in the CPI-U was smaller in 1997 than in the previous year, the increase in real hourly compensation in 1997, 1.5 percent, was larger than the 0.8-percent increase in 1996. The 1997 increase in real hourly compensation was the largest since a 2.1 percent rise in 1992.

Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector grew 2.1 percent in 1997, slightly more than the 1.9-percent increase posted in 1996. The implicit price deflator, which reflects nonlabor payments as well as labor costs, rose 1.7 percent in both of the past two years.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity grew 4.4 percent in 1997, continuing a trend of annual increases that began in 1980. Output in the manufacturing sector increased 5.6 percent in 1997, and hours of all persons rose 1.1 percent. In 1996, manufacturing productivity rose 3.7 percent as output increased 3.2 percent and hours fell 0.5 percent. Although productivity increased in both the durable and nondurable goods sectors in 1997, durable goods manufacturers had a larger increase (5.7 percent) than nondurable goods manufacturers (3.2 percent). Trends in output and hours also were different in the two subsectors. Output and hours rose 8.0 and 2.2 percent, respectively, in the durable goods sector in 1997. In the nondurable goods sector, output rose 2.9 percent while hours fell slightly, 0.3 percent (tables B, 3, 4, and 5).

The hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 3.5 percent in 1997, somewhat faster than the 3.2-percent increase that occurred in 1996. Real hourly compensation in the manufacturing sector rose 1.2 percent in 1997 following a 0.2 percent rise in the previous year. The 1997 increase in real hourly compensation was the largest since 1992, when it rose 1.4 percent. Hourly compensation in durable goods rose 3.1 percent in 1997, and real hourly compensation increased 0.8 percent. In nondurable goods industries, hourly compensation rose 4.0 percent, while real hourly compensation grew 1.6 percent.

Unit labor costs in the manufacturing sector fell 0.9 percent last year. This was the third consecutive year of falling unit labor costs in this sector: they fell 0.5 percent in 1996 and 0.3 percent in 1995. In durable goods, unit labor costs have fallen every year since 1991 (when they rose 3.4 percent). Unit labor costs in durable goods industries fell 2.5 percent in 1997, and they rose 0.7 percent in nondurable goods.

Revised Measures

Productivity and cost data for the fourth quarter and full year 1997 for business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing were revised to incorporate the most recent information. In the business and nonfarm business sectors, productivity and output measures for the fourth quarter are lower and unit labor costs are higher than those reported on Feb. 10 based on information available at that time. Unit labor costs also were revised up in the manufacturing sector due to changes in the hourly compensation data. Annual measures of productivity and costs were unchanged in all sectors. Quarterly series for real hourly compensation in the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors were revised back to the first quarter of 1993 to incorporate the annual recalculation of seasonal factors for the Consumer Price Index (table C).

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 10, 1998.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 8, 1998Publication referenceMar 10, 199830 days laterApr 9, 1998
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.03%Observed 7.19%Observed +16 bps vs. earlier reference7.15%Observed −4 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 10, 1997 – Jun 10, 1998
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 10, 1998Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Dec 12, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.07% · Dec 19, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 6.99% · Dec 26, 199730-year fixed mortgage: 7.03% · Jan 2, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Jan 9, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Jan 16, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.99% · Jan 23, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.12% · Jan 30, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.03% · Feb 6, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.06% · Feb 13, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.99% · Feb 20, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Feb 28, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · Mar 6, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.16% · Mar 13, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Mar 20, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Mar 27, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.15% · Apr 3, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Apr 10, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Apr 17, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.15% · Apr 24, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.22% · May 1, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · May 8, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.19% · May 15, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.10% · May 22, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.07% · May 29, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 7.05% · Jun 5, 1998Dec 10, 1997Mar 10, 1998Jun 10, 1998
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,034.33/month

7.19% · Mar 6, 1998

At the later reference$2,026.22/month

7.15% · Apr 3, 1998

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $8.11 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →