Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

1996 First Quarter (Preliminary) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 1996. The seasonally-adjusted annual rates of…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

First Quarter 1996

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported preliminary productivity data--as measured by output per hour of all persons--for the first quarter of 1996. The seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change in the first quarter were:

2.8 percent in the business sector, and 2.6 percent in the nonfarm business sector.

In both sectors, first-quarter productivity gains were larger than gains recorded in the third and fourth quarters of 1995.

In manufacturing, productivity changes in the first quarter were:

6.3 percent in manufacturing, 8.2 percent in durable goods manufacturing, and 3.8 percent in nondurable goods manufacturing.

The productivity increase in manufacturing in the first quarter was the largest since the first quarter of 1994. Output and hours in manufacturing, which includes about 18 percent of U.S. business-sector employment, tend to vary more from quarter to quarter than data for the more aggregate business and nonfarm business sectors. First-quarter measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

The data sources and methods used in the preparation of the manufacturing series differ from those used in preparing the business and nonfarm business series and these measures are not directly comparable. Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Quarterly output measures for manufacturing reflect independent indexes of industrial production prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes for further information on data sources (page 5).

Business

From the fourth quarter of 1995 to the first quarter of 1996, business sector productivity increased at a 2.8 percent annual rate. Output and hours advanced 4.0 percent and 1.1 percent, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 1995, output had increased 0.7 percent, and hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased 1.3 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates); productivity fell 0.5 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 3.0 percent during the first quarter of 1996 and 3.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 1995. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in hourly compensation and productivity, increased at a 0.2 percent rate during the first quarter. Unit labor costs in the business sector had risen 3.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 1995. The 0.2 percent increase in the first quarter of 1996 was the smallest since a 1.3 percent decline in the third quarter of 1994.

Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), fell at a 0.2 percent annual rate in the first quarter. In the fourth quarter of 1995, real hourly compensation had increased 0.7 percent.

The implicit price deflator for the business sector, which reflects changes in unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased 1.6 percent in the first quarter, compared with a 0.8 percent increase during the fourth quarter of 1995.

Nonfarm business

Productivity rose 2.6 percent in the nonfarm business sector in the first quarter, slightly less than in the business sector as a whole. Nonfarm business output rose 3.7 percent, and hours of all persons increased 1.0 percent. During the fourth quarter of 1995, productivity had fallen 1.0 percent in this sector, reflecting gains of 0.6 percent in output and 1.6 percent in hours (table 2).

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.3 percent annual rate in the first quarter, compared with a 2.8 percent increase one quarter earlier. When the rise in the CPI-U was taken into account, real hourly compensation was unchanged; it had increased 0.4 percent in the fourth quarter. Unit labor costs rose 0.6 percent, considerably less than the 3.8 percent increase which occurred in the fourth quarter of 1995.

The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output rose 1.4 percent in the first quarter, compared with a 0.7 percent rise one quarter earlier.

Manufacturing

Productivity increased at a 6.3 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate in manufacturing in the first quarter of 1996, as output rose 2.8 percent and hours of all persons dropped 3.2 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). In the fourth quarter of 1995, productivity rose 3.0 percent as output rose 1.4 percent and hours decreased 1.5 percent (table 3).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers fell 0.8 percent during the first quarter, the first decrease since a 0.6 percent decrease in the second quarter of 1989. Hourly compensation had risen 2.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 1995. The 0.8 percent decrease in the first quarter of 1996 reflects very different trends in the durable and nondurable manufacturing sectors--in durable goods, hourly compensation dropped 3.2 percent in the first quarter, and in nondurable goods hourly compensation rose 3.1 percent (tables 4 and 5). The first quarter 1996 movements in hourly compensation for durable and total manufacturing were affected by a pension contribution made in 1995 by a large manufacturer.

Real hourly compensation in the manufacturing sector fell 3.9 percent when the increase in consumer prices was taken into account. Unit labor costs dropped at a 6.6 percent annual rate in the first quarter of 1996, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of decreases in the manufacturing sector. These costs had fallen 0.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 1995.

REVISED MEASURES

Current and previous measures for the fourth quarter of 1995 for manufacturing are compared in table B. The quarterly movements differ from those reported on April 10, based on information then available. There were no revisions to data for other sectors.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release May 16, 1996.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierApr 16, 1996Publication referenceMay 16, 199630 days laterJun 15, 1996
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.05%Observed 8.24%Observed +19 bps vs. earlier reference8.39%Observed +15 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Feb 16, 1996 – Aug 16, 1996
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around May 16, 1996Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.50%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Feb 16, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.32% · Feb 23, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.41% · Mar 1, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.38% · Mar 8, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · Mar 15, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.81% · Mar 22, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.69% · Mar 29, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.78% · Apr 5, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.05% · Apr 12, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.95% · Apr 19, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.92% · Apr 26, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.99% · May 3, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.24% · May 10, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.08% · May 17, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.01% · May 24, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.03% · May 31, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.30% · Jun 7, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.39% · Jun 14, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.30% · Jun 21, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.29% · Jun 28, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.14% · Jul 5, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.42% · Jul 12, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Jul 19, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.19% · Jul 26, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Aug 2, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Aug 9, 199630-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Aug 16, 1996Feb 16, 1996May 16, 1996Aug 16, 1996
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,251.69/month

8.24% · May 10, 1996

At the later reference$2,283.39/month

8.39% · Jun 14, 1996

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $31.70 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →