Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Economy · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

1994 Fourth-Quarter and Annual Averages (Revised) Productivity and Costs

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised fourth-quarter seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change--as measured by output per hour of all persons--and revised annual changes for…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Fourth-Quarter and Annual Averages, 1994

The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor today reported revised fourth-quarter seasonally-adjusted annual rates of productivity change--as measured by output per hour of all persons--and revised annual changes for the full year 1994. In the fourth quarter, productivity increased moderately in both the business and nonfarm business sectors. Percent changes in business and nonfarm business productivity were:

For the year 1994, productivity increases in both sectors were somewhat greater than in 1993. These productivity improvements, combined with modest increases in hourly compensation, led to the smallest increases in unit labor costs in three decades. Fourth-quarter productivity and related measures are summarized in table A and appear in detail in tables 1 through 5.

In the manufacturing sector, increases in productivity were:

Manufacturing productivity grew at a 3.1 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter as both output and hours increased at the fastest rates since the fourth quarter of 1987. The growth rates in productivity, output, and hours in durable goods manufacturing were more rapid than in nondurables (table A). On an annual basis, manufacturing productivity increased 4.9 percent, the largest yearly gain since 1987.

Output measures for business and nonfarm business are based on measures of gross domestic product prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Output measures for manufacturing reflect independent indexes of industrial production prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See Technical Notes (page 7) for further information on data sources.

THIRD-TO-FOURTH QUARTER CHANGES, 1994

Business

Business sector productivity increased 1.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 1994. This gain reflected output growth of 5.4 percent and growth in the hours of all persons engaged in the sector of 3.6 percent (seasonally adjusted annual rates). During the third quarter of 1994, business productivity had increased 3.7 percent, output 4.5 percent, and hours 0.8 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased at a 3.1 percent rate during the fourth quarter of 1994, compared with a 3.6 percent increase during the third quarter. This measure includes wages and salaries, supplements, employer contributions to employee-benefit plans, and taxes. Unit labor costs, which reflect changes in hourly compensation and productivity, increased at a 1.3 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter, compared with a 0.2 percent decrease one quarter earlier.

Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), rose at a 0.8 percent annual rate for persons in the business sector. This measure had been unchanged during the third quarter.

The implicit price deflator for business output, which reflects changes in unit labor costs and unit nonlabor payments, increased at a 0.6 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter. During the third quarter, prices of the goods and services which comprise business output had increased at a 2.0 percent rate.

Nonfarm business

In the nonfarm business sector, productivity rose 1.7 percent in the fourth quarter. Output rose 5.3 percent, and hours of all persons--employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers--rose 3.5 percent. During the third quarter, nonfarm productivity had increased 3.2 percent as output grew 4.3 percent and hours 1.1 percent (table 2).

Hourly compensation rose 3.4 percent in the fourth quarter, and real hourly compensation increased 1.2 percent when the increase in the CPI-U was taken into account. During the third quarter, hourly compensation had increased by 3.1 percent, and real hourly compensation dropped 0.4 percent. Unit labor costs rose 1.7 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with a 0.1 percent decrease during the third quarter.

The implicit price deflator for nonfarm business, reflecting the modest increase in unit labor costs and a 1.7 percent fall in unit nonlabor payments, rose only 0.5 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with a 2.3 percent increase one quarter earlier.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity rose at a 3.1 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1994, following an increase of 3.5 percent in the third quarter. Output rose 7.7 percent in the fourth quarter, the fifth consecutive quarter of increases exceeding 5 percent, and hours of all persons increased 4.5 percent. Both durable and nondurable goods industries experienced productivity increases in the fourth quarter, but the increases in durable manufacturing productivity and output were greater (tables 4 and 5).

Hourly compensation of all manufacturing workers increased 3.4 percent during the fourth quarter, 1.1 percent when the increase in consumer prices was taken into account. Unit labor costs rose at a 0.3 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 1994, after falling in the four previous quarters.

ANNUAL AVERAGE CHANGES, 1993-1994

Business

In the calendar year 1994, business productivity increased 2.3 percent, up from a 1.5 percent increase in 1993. Output grew 5.3 percent in 1994, and hours of all persons engaged in the sector increased 2.9 percent (table 1).

Hourly compensation increased 3.2 percent in 1994 (the smallest annual increase since 2.6 percent in 1955) and 3.6 percent in 1993. Real hourly compensation increased 0.6 percent in both 1994 and 1993.

Unit labor costs increased 0.8 percent during 1994, compared with a 2.0 percent increase a year earlier. These costs grew less in 1994 than in 1993 because of the smaller increase in hourly compensation and higher productivity growth.

Nonfarm business

Productivity increased 2.2 percent in the nonfarm business sector during 1994, as output rose 5.2 percent and hours of all persons increased 2.9 per- cent. In 1993, productivity had risen 1.5 percent, reflecting output and hours increases of 4.1 and 2.5 percent, respectively. Hourly compensation rose 3.1 percent in 1994. Although this was the smallest increase in hourly compensation since 1949 (when it rose 3.0 percent), it was just slightly less than the 3.3 percent rise in 1993. Real hourly compensation increased 0.5 percent, up from a 0.2 percent rise in 1993.

Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector grew only 0.9 percent in 1994 and 1.7 percent in 1993.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing productivity grew 4.9 percent in 1994, as output rose 6.1 percent and hours of all persons 1.2 percent. During 1993, productivity rose 3.2 percent, output rose 4.1 percent, and hours increased 0.8 percent. The increases in manufacturing productivity and output in 1994 were the largest since 1987. The increase in hours occurred because of increases in both employment and average weekly hours. Although employment growth was modest, it was the first annual increase since 1989. Manufacturing workers' average weekly hours in 1994 were at historically high levels.

Hourly compensation of manufacturing workers increased 2.8 percent during 1994, but only 0.2 percent after the increase in consumer prices is taken into account. Unit labor costs fell 2.0 percent in 1994, the first such decline since 1987, reflecting both faster productivity growth and a smaller gain in compensation per hour than in 1993.

Both durable and nondurable goods industries experienced productivity increases in 1994. The large gain among durable goods producers, 5.9 percent, reflected strong output growth and a slight increase in hours. In nondurable goods industries, productivity, output, and hours all grew modestly in 1994 (tables 4 and 5).

Revised measures

Productivity and cost measures for the fourth quarter and full year 1994 for business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing were revised to incorporate the most recent information, and were somewhat different from the preliminary results announced on February 7. Hourly compensation and the related real hourly compensation and unit labor cost measures were revised down in the business, nonfarm business and manufacturing sectors (table B).

Measures of real hourly compensation were revised for all sectors to reflect revisions to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. These revisions to the CPI, which reflect updated seasonal adjustment factors, were released February 15 (USDL 95-52). Measures for 1990 forward were affected.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 8, 1995.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate output per hour from compensation per unit

Labor productivity measures real output per hour worked. Unit labor costs relate labor compensation to output, so a change in hourly pay alone does not describe the change in cost per unit produced. Check the sector, whether a quarterly percentage change has been annualized, and how it differs from the change over four quarters. Revisions to output and hours can alter earlier estimates. Productivity and costs help describe the economy’s supply conditions; the historical rate comparison does not measure this release’s isolated effect. BLS Productivity and Costs.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 6, 1995Publication referenceMar 8, 199530 days laterApr 7, 1995
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.94%Observed 8.53%Observed −41 bps vs. earlier reference8.41%Observed −12 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 8, 1994 – Jun 8, 1995
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 8, 1995Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.50%9.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 9.15% · Dec 9, 199430-year fixed mortgage: 9.25% · Dec 16, 199430-year fixed mortgage: 9.18% · Dec 23, 199430-year fixed mortgage: 9.18% · Dec 30, 199430-year fixed mortgage: 9.22% · Jan 6, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 9.19% · Jan 13, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 9.05% · Jan 20, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 9.13% · Jan 27, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.94% · Feb 3, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.80% · Feb 10, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.84% · Feb 17, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.73% · Feb 24, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.53% · Mar 3, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.62% · Mar 10, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.38% · Mar 17, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.40% · Mar 24, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.38% · Mar 31, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.41% · Apr 7, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.37% · Apr 14, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.24% · Apr 21, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.26% · Apr 28, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.27% · May 5, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.87% · May 12, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · May 19, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · May 26, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.71% · Jun 2, 1995Dec 8, 1994Mar 8, 1995Jun 8, 1995
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,313.12/month

8.53% · Mar 3, 1995

At the later reference$2,287.63/month

8.41% · Apr 7, 1995

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $25.49 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the Treasury–mortgage relationship →See current advertised mortgage options →