Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 2013 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 0.8 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods rose 0.5 percent in May and fell 0.7 percent in April. At the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 0.8 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Prices for finished goods rose 0.5 percent in May and fell 0.7 percent in April. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods advanced 0.5 percent in June, and the crude goods index was unchanged. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods moved up 2.5 percent for the 12 months ended June 2013, the largest 12-month rise since a 2.8-percent increase in March 2012. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In June, most of the broad-based rise in finished goods prices can be traced to the index for finished energy goods, which increased 2.9 percent. Also contributing to the advance in finished goods prices, the indexes for finished goods less foods and energy and for finished consumer foods both moved up 0.2 percent.

Finished energy: Prices for finished energy goods climbed 2.9 percent in June, the largest rise since a 3.2-percent increase in February 2013. The June advance is mostly attributable to a 7.2- percent jump in the index for gasoline. Higher prices for home heating oil and diesel fuel also contributed to the rise in the finished energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.2 percent in June, the eighth consecutive advance. A major contributor to the June increase were prices for passenger cars, which rose 0.8 percent. An advance in the index for light motor trucks also was a factor in higher finished core prices.

Finished foods: Prices for finished consumer foods advanced 0.2 percent in June following a 0.6-percent increase in May. The June rise was led by the index for meats, which moved up 4.2 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components advanced 0.5 percent in June after three consecutive declines. Accounting for over eighty percent of the broad-based increase, prices for intermediate energy goods rose 2.0 percent. The index for intermediate materials less foods and energy inched up 0.1 percent, and prices for intermediate foods and feeds climbed 0.7 percent. For the 12 months ended in June, the intermediate goods index advanced 1.1 percent, the first 12-month increase since a 1.3-percent rise in February 2013. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: Prices for intermediate energy goods increased 2.0 percent in June following a 0.5-percent rise in May. A major factor in the June advance was the electric power index, which moved up 0.5 percent. Higher prices for gasoline and jet fuel also were factors in the increase in the intermediate energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate materials less foods and energy inched up 0.1 percent in June after two consecutive declines. Most of the June rise can be attributed to a 1.1- percent increase in the index for basic organic chemicals. Higher prices for converted paper and paperboard products also contributed significantly to the advance in the intermediate core index.

Intermediate foods: Prices for intermediate foods and feeds climbed 0.7 percent in June following a 1.1-percent rise in the prior month. A major factor in the June increase was a 1.5- percent advance in the index for processed poultry. Higher prices for meats also contributed significantly to the rise in the index for intermediate foods and feeds.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing was unchanged in June. For the 3 months ended in June, prices for crude goods moved up 1.7 percent after falling 1.8 percent for the 3 months ended in March. On a monthly basis in June, a 0.3-percent increase in the crude energy materials index and a 0.1-percent advance in prices for crude nonfood materials less energy offset a 0.3-percent decrease in the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs. (See table B.)

Crude energy: Prices for crude energy materials rose 0.3 percent in June. In the second quarter of 2013, the index for crude energy materials jumped 9.2 percent compared with a 4.0-percent decrease in the first quarter. The monthly advance in June can be traced to prices for crude petroleum, which increased 1.7 percent. (See table 2.)

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy inched up 0.1 percent in June. From March to June, crude core prices fell 4.9 percent subsequent to a 0.9-percent decline in the prior quarter. In June, the monthly advance was led by a 2.0-percent increase in the index for nonferrous scrap. Higher prices for construction sand, gravel, and crushed stone also contributed to the rise in the crude core index.

Crude foods: Prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs decreased 0.3 percent in June. In the second quarter, the index for crude foods moved down 0.9 percent after falling 0.6 percent for the 3 months ended in March. The monthly decline in June was led by a 3.8-percent drop in prices for slaughter steers and heifers. Lower prices for raw milk and unprocessed finfish also were factors in the decrease in the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries moved down 0.5 percent in June following a 0.9-percent decrease a month earlier. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Leading the June decline, margins received by discount department stores fell 15.2 percent. Lower margins received by family clothing stores and merchant wholesalers of durable goods also contributed to the decrease in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries rose 0.6 percent in June after a 0.6-percent decrease in May. Most of the increase is attributable to a 3.0-percent jump in prices received by the industry for scheduled passenger air transportation. Higher prices received by the industries for long distance general freight trucking and freight transportation arrangement also were factors in the advance in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Services less trade, transportation, and warehousing: The Producer Price Index for the net output of services less trade, transportation, and warehousing moved up 0.4 percent in June, the third consecutive increase. Accounting for about forty percent of the June advance, prices received by the industry group for depository credit intermediation rose 1.9 percent. Higher prices received by investment bankers and securities dealers and by the passenger car rental industry also contributed to the advance in the index for services less trade, transportation, and warehousing.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 12, 2013.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJun 12, 2013Publication referenceJul 12, 201330 days laterAug 11, 2013
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®3.91%Observed 4.51%Observed +60 bps vs. earlier reference4.40%Observed −11 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 12, 2013 – Oct 12, 2013
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 12, 2013Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.00%4.00%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 3.41% · Apr 18, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.40% · Apr 25, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.35% · May 2, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.42% · May 9, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.51% · May 16, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.59% · May 23, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.81% · May 30, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.91% · Jun 6, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.98% · Jun 13, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 3.93% · Jun 20, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.46% · Jun 27, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.29% · Jul 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 11, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Jul 18, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.31% · Jul 25, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 1, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Aug 8, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.40% · Aug 15, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.58% · Aug 22, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Aug 29, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Sep 5, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Sep 12, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Sep 19, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 26, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Oct 3, 201330-year fixed mortgage: 4.23% · Oct 10, 2013Apr 12, 2013Jul 12, 2013Oct 12, 2013
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,521.84/month

4.51% · Jul 11, 2013

At the later reference$1,502.28/month

4.40% · Aug 8, 2013

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $19.56 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →