Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

February 2011 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 1.6 percent in February, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This rise followed advances of 0.8 percent in January and 0.9 percent in December,…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for finished goods increased 1.6 percent in February, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This rise followed advances of 0.8 percent in January and 0.9 percent in December, and marks the largest increase in finished goods prices since a 1.9-percent advance in June 2009. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by manufacturers of intermediate goods moved up 2.0 percent, and the crude goods index climbed 3.4 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods advanced 5.6 percent for the 12 months ended February 2011, the largest 12-month increase since a 5.9-percent rise in March 2010. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

Leading the broad-based increase in the index for finished goods, prices for finished energy goods and finished consumer foods moved up 3.3 percent and 3.9 percent, respectively. The index for finished goods less foods and energy also contributed to this advance, rising 0.2 percent.

Finished energy: Prices for finished energy goods climbed 3.3 percent in February, the fifth straight monthly increase. Accounting for over forty percent of the February advance, prices for gasoline rose 3.7 percent. Also contributing to higher prices for finished energy goods were increases in the indexes for home heating oil and residential electric power. (See table 2.)

Finished foods: The index for finished consumer foods surged 3.9 percent in February, the largest increase since a 4.2-percent climb in November 1974. About seventy percent of the February rise can be traced to higher prices for fresh and dry vegetables, which jumped 48.7 percent. Advances in the indexes for meats and dairy products also were major factors in the increase in the finished consumer foods index.

Finished core: In February, prices for finished goods less foods and energy moved up 0.2 percent, the third consecutive rise. Accounting for about twenty percent of the February increase was the index for passenger cars, which advanced 0.6 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for intermediate materials, supplies, and components advanced 2.0 percent in February, the largest increase since a 2.7-percent rise in July 2008. About half of the broad-based February advance can be attributed to prices for intermediate energy goods, which climbed 4.3 percent. The indexes for intermediate goods other than foods and energy and for intermediate foods and feeds also contributed to this increase, moving up 1.1 percent and 2.6 percent, respectively. For the 12 months ended February 2011, prices for intermediate goods climbed 7.8 percent, the largest advance since rising 8.3 percent in May 2010. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: The intermediate energy goods index advanced 4.3 percent in February, the largest increase since a 6.3-percent jump in January 2010. Over thirty percent of the February monthly rise can be traced to prices for diesel fuel, which moved up 12.6 percent. Higher prices for gasoline and jet fuel also were major factors in the February advance in the intermediate energy goods index. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: Prices for intermediate goods less foods and energy climbed 1.1 percent in February, the seventh straight advance. Accounting for thirty percent of the February rise, prices for basic organic chemicals increased 4.5 percent. The iron and steel index also moved up, contributing to the advance in intermediate core prices.

Intermediate foods: The intermediate foods and feeds index rose 2.6 percent in February, the largest advance since a 4.1-percent increase in July 2008. A 4.1-percent jump in prices for dairy products accounted for nearly a quarter of the February advance in the intermediate foods index.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for crude materials for further processing rose 3.4 percent in February. For the 3 months ended in February, prices for crude materials climbed 13.8 percent, subsequent to a 6.7-percent increase for the 3 months ended November 2010. Over three-fourths of the February over-the-month advance is attributable to the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs, which jumped 6.7 percent. Also contributing to the rise in prices for crude goods, the indexes for crude nonfood materials less energy and crude energy materials moved up 2.3 percent and 0.9 percent, respectively. (See table B.)

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs increased 6.7 percent in February. From November to February, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs surged 12.1 percent, compared with an 8.9-percent rise from August to November. Nearly thirty percent of the February monthly advance can be traced to a 9.8-percent jump in the grains index. Higher prices for fluid milk and slaughter livestock also were major contributors to the increase in the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs. (See table 2.)

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy moved up 2.3 percent in February. For the 3 months ended in February, crude core prices rose 10.1 percent following a 9.8-percent advance for the 3 months ended November 2010. A major contributor to the February over-the-month increase was the index for nonferrous metal ores, which climbed 4.4 percent. Higher prices for grains also were a significant factor in the rise in the crude core index.

Crude energy: The index for crude energy materials advanced 0.9 percent in February. From November to February, prices for crude energy materials increased 17.8 percent after rising 2.1 percent from August to November. In February, a 7.6-percent jump in the natural gas index led the monthly rise in prices for crude energy materials.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total trade industries moved up 1.5 percent in February, the first increase since October 2010. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) A quarter of the February rise can be traced to a 12.0-percent advance in margins received by pharmacies and drug stores. Higher margins received by family clothing stores and merchant wholesalers of nondurable goods also contributed significantly to the increase in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of transportation and warehousing industries rose 0.5 percent in February, the fifth consecutive increase. Over one-third of the February gain can be attributed to a 2.1-percent advance in prices received by line-haul railroads. Increases in the indexes for couriers and general freight trucking also were factors in the rise in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the net output of total traditional service industries moved down 0.2 percent in February, subsequent to a 0.7-percent advance a month earlier. Leading the February decline, prices received by the commercial banking industry fell 4.8 percent. Lower prices received by general medical and surgical hospitals and by wired telecommunications carriers also contributed to the February decrease in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 16, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 14, 2011Publication referenceMar 16, 201130 days laterApr 15, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®5.05%Observed 4.88%Observed −17 bps vs. earlier reference4.91%Observed +3 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 16, 2010 – Jun 16, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 16, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.75%5.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.83% · Dec 16, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Dec 23, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.86% · Dec 30, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.77% · Jan 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.71% · Jan 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.74% · Jan 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.80% · Jan 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Feb 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 5.05% · Feb 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 5.00% · Feb 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.95% · Feb 24, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.87% · Mar 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.88% · Mar 10, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.76% · Mar 17, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.81% · Mar 24, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.86% · Mar 31, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.87% · Apr 7, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.91% · Apr 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.80% · Apr 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.78% · Apr 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.71% · May 5, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.63% · May 12, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.61% · May 19, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · May 26, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jun 2, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Jun 9, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 16, 2011Dec 16, 2010Mar 16, 2011Jun 16, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,588.54/month

4.88% · Mar 10, 2011

At the later reference$1,594.00/month

4.91% · Apr 14, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $5.47 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →