Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 2010 Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for Finished Goods fell 0.5 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This decrease followed declines of 0.3 percent in May and 0.1 percent in April. At the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Producer Price Index for Finished Goods fell 0.5 percent in June, seasonally adjusted, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. This decrease followed declines of 0.3 percent in May and 0.1 percent in April. At the earlier stages of processing, prices received by producers of intermediate goods moved down 0.9 percent in June and the crude goods index dropped 2.4 percent. On an unadjusted basis, prices for finished goods rose 2.8 percent for the 12 months ended June 2010, their third straight month of slowing year-over-year advances following a 6.0- percent increase for the 12 months ended in March. (See table A.)

Stage-of-Processing Analysis

Finished goods

In June, over eighty percent of the 0.5-percent decrease in the finished goods index can be traced to prices for consumer foods, which fell 2.2 percent. Also contributing to lower finished goods prices, the index for finished energy goods declined 0.5 percent. By contrast, prices for finished goods other than foods and energy inched up 0.1 percent in June.

Finished foods: The index for finished consumer foods fell 2.2 percent in June, its third straight decline following six consecutive advances. Over half of the June decrease can be attributed to prices for fresh and dry vegetables, which dropped 21.8 percent. Lower prices for fresh fruits and melons and for meats also were significant factors in the decline in the index for finished consumer foods. (See table 2.)

Finished energy goods: Prices for finished energy goods moved down 0.5 percent in June, their third straight decrease. Leading the June decline, the gasoline index fell 1.6 percent. Lower prices for home heating oil also contributed to the decrease in the index for finished energy goods.

Finished core: The index for finished goods less foods and energy edged up 0.1 percent in June, its eighth consecutive monthly rise. Leading the June advance, cigarette prices increased 1.4 percent.

Intermediate goods

The Producer Price Index for Intermediate Materials, Supplies, and Components moved down 0.9 percent in June, its first decline since July 2009. About two-thirds of the June decrease can be attributed to lower prices for intermediate energy goods, which fell 2.6 percent. The index for intermediate materials less foods and energy also contributed to the overall decline, moving down 0.4 percent. By contrast, prices for intermediate foods and feeds inched up 0.1 percent. On a 12-month basis, prices for intermediate goods climbed 6.4 percent, their seventh consecutive month of year-over-year advances. (See table B.)

Intermediate energy: The index for intermediate energy goods moved down 2.6 percent in June, its first decrease since February 2010. Accounting for about thirty percent of the June decline was a 7.4-percent drop in diesel fuel prices. The indexes for commercial electric power and jet fuel also contributed significantly to lower intermediate energy goods prices. (See table 2.)

Intermediate core: The index for intermediate materials less foods and energy moved down 0.4 percent in June, its first decrease since May 2009. Nearly half of the June decline can be attributed to a 4.6-percent drop in prices for primary basic organic chemicals. The index for nonferrous mill shapes also was a factor in the intermediate core decline.

Intermediate foods: The index for intermediate foods and feeds inched up 0.1 percent in June, its third consecutive monthly increase. This advance was led by the index for soybean cake and meal, which climbed 3.9 percent.

Crude goods

The Producer Price Index for Crude Materials for Further Processing declined 2.4 percent in June. For the 3 months ending in June, crude material prices fell 6.2 percent after moving up 8.2 percent from December to March. In June, about eighty percent of the monthly decrease was due to the index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs, which dropped 5.3 percent. Lower prices for crude nonfood materials less energy also contributed to the overall decline, falling 4.8 percent. By contrast, the index for crude energy materials rose 1.7 percent in June. (See table B.)

Crude foods: The index for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs moved down 5.3 percent in June. From March to June, prices for crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs declined 5.0 percent after climbing 5.0 percent in the prior 3-month period. Accounting for two-thirds of the June decrease, the index for slaughter livestock fell 9.1 percent. Lower prices for grains and fresh vegetables (except potatoes) also were significant factors in the decline in the crude foodstuffs and feedstuffs index. (See table 2.)

Crude core: The index for crude nonfood materials less energy decreased 4.8 percent in June. For the 3-month period ending in June, crude core prices dropped 2.6 percent. This decline followed an 11.8- percent jump from December to March. Accounting for about thirty percent of the June decrease, the index for iron and steel scrap moved down 5.1 percent. Lower copper ore prices also contributed to the decline in the crude core index.

Crude energy: The index for crude energy materials moved up 1.7 percent in June. From March to June, prices for crude energy materials fell 9.2 percent compared with a 9.0-percent increase in the previous 3-month period. About sixty percent of the June advance can be attributed to a 2.7- percent rise in the index for natural gas.

Services Analysis

Trade industries: The Producer Price Index for the Net Output of Total Trade Industries fell 2.3 percent in June. For the 12 months ending in June, the total trade industries index was unchanged. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Leading the monthly June decrease, margins received by merchant wholesalers of durable goods moved down 3.6 percent. Lower margins received by gasoline stations with convenience stores and discount department stores also were major factors in the decline in the total trade industries index.

Transportation and warehousing industries: The Producer Price Index for the Net Output of Transportation and Warehousing Industries moved up 0.4 percent in June, its sixth consecutive increase. Most of the June advance can be attributed to a 1.8-percent rise in prices received by the scheduled passenger air transportation industry. Higher prices received by line-haul railroads and couriers also contributed to the advance in the transportation and warehousing industries index.

Traditional service industries: The Producer Price Index for the Net Output of Total Traditional Service Industries edged up 0.1 percent in June following no change in the prior month. Prices received by the industry group for depository credit intermediation moved up 1.5 percent. Higher prices received by direct property and casualty insurance carriers and by the passenger car rental industry also were factors in the increase in the total traditional service industries index.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 15, 2010.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read producer prices from the seller’s perspective

The Producer Price Index measures changes in prices received by domestic producers. It differs from the Consumer Price Index, which follows prices paid by urban consumers. Check the release’s classification: older reports emphasize finished goods, while the headline framework changed to final demand in 2014. Distinguish goods from services, monthly from annual changes, and final from intermediate demand where reported. Producer-price movements do not establish an equal change in consumer inflation or explain the benchmark movements below on their own. BLS Producer Price Index overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJun 15, 2010Publication referenceJul 15, 201030 days laterAug 14, 2010
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.72%Observed 4.57%Observed −15 bps vs. earlier reference4.44%Observed −13 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 15, 2010 – Oct 15, 2010
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 15, 2010Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.4.00%4.75%5.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 15, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.07% · Apr 22, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.06% · Apr 29, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 5.00% · May 6, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.93% · May 13, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.84% · May 20, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.78% · May 27, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.79% · Jun 3, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.72% · Jun 10, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.75% · Jun 17, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.69% · Jun 24, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.58% · Jul 1, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Jul 8, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.57% · Jul 15, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.56% · Jul 22, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.54% · Jul 29, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Aug 5, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.44% · Aug 12, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.42% · Aug 19, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.36% · Aug 26, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 2, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.35% · Sep 9, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 16, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.37% · Sep 23, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Sep 30, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.27% · Oct 7, 201030-year fixed mortgage: 4.19% · Oct 14, 2010Apr 15, 2010Jul 15, 2010Oct 15, 2010
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,532.56/month

4.57% · Jul 15, 2010

At the later reference$1,509.38/month

4.44% · Aug 12, 2010

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $23.18 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →