Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

Job Openings and Labor Turnover: June 2011

There were 3.1 million job openings on the last business day of June, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The hires rate (3.1 percent) and separations rate (3.1 percent) were again little changed over the month. This…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

There were 3.1 million job openings on the last business day of June, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The hires rate (3.1 percent) and separations rate (3.1 percent) were again little changed over the month. This release includes estimates of the number and rate of job openings, hires, and separations for the total nonfarm sector by industry and by geographic region.

Job Openings The number of job openings in June was 3.1 million, essentially unchanged from May. (See table 1.) Although the number of job openings in June was 997,000 higher than in July 2009 (the series trough), it has been relatively flat since February 2011 and remains well below the 4.4 million openings when the recession began in December 2007.

The number of job openings in June (not seasonally adjusted) rose from a year earlier for total nonfarm and total private. The number of job openings increased in mining and logging, retail trade, professional and business services, and health care and social assistance. Job openings decreased over the year for federal government. (See table 5.) Over the year comparisons for federal government are impacted by last year’s elevated numbers of job openings, hires, and separations of temporary workers needed to conduct the 2010 Census.

Hires In June, the hires rate was about unchanged at 3.1 percent for total nonfarm. The hires rate was also essentially unchanged for all industries and regions. (See table 2.) At 4.1 million in June, the number of hires is up from 3.6 million in October 2009 (the series trough) but remains below the 5.0 million hires when the recession began in December 2007.

Over the past 12 months, the hires rate (not seasonally adjusted) rose in construction, information, and accommodation and food services. The hires rate fell in finance and insurance and in federal government over the year. (See table 6.)

Separations The total separations figure includes voluntary quits, involuntary layoffs and discharges, and other separations, including retirements. Total separations is also referred to as turnover.

The seasonally adjusted total separations rate was essentially unchanged in June for total nonfarm (3.1 percent), total private (3.4 percent), and government (1.4 percent). (See table 3.) Over the year, the total separations rate (not seasonally adjusted) was essentially unchanged for total nonfarm and total private but decreased for government. (See table 7.)

The quits rate can serve as a measure of workers’ willingness or ability to change jobs. In June, the quits rate was essentially unchanged for total nonfarm (1.5 percent), total private (1.7 percent), and government (0.5 percent). (See table 4.) Although the number of quits rose from 1.5 million in January 2010 (the most recent trough) to 1.9 million in June 2011, the number remained below the 2.8 million quits when the recession began in December 2007.

The number of quits (not seasonally adjusted) in June 2011 was essentially unchanged from 12 months earlier for total nonfarm, total private, and government. Educational services experienced an increase in the number of quits over the year, while the finance and insurance industry and federal government experienced a decline. In the regions, the number of quits rose in the Midwest but was little changed in the other three regions. (See table 8.)

The layoffs and discharges component of total separations is seasonally adjusted only at the total nonfarm, total private, and government levels. The layoffs and discharges rate was little changed in June for total nonfarm, total private, and government. The number of layoffs and discharges for total nonfarm was 1.8 million in June, up slightly from the recent low point of 1.5 million in January 2011, but still well below the peak of 2.5 million in February 2009. (See table B below.)

The layoffs and discharges level (not seasonally adjusted) declined over the 12 months ending in June for government. The level decreased over the year for federal government, returning to a more typical level after a large number of layoffs in June 2010 of temporary Census workers. The number of layoffs and discharges was little changed in all four regions over the year. (See table 9.)

The other separations series is not seasonally adjusted. In June, there were 394,000 other separations for total nonfarm, 259,000 for total private, and 135,000 for government. Compared to June 2010, the number of other separations was little changed for total nonfarm, total private, and government. (See table 10.)

Relative Contributions to Separations The total separations level is influenced by the relative contribution of its three components—quits, layoffs and discharges, and other separations. The percentage of total separations attributable to the individual components has varied over time at the total nonfarm level, but for the majority of the months since the series began in December 2000, the proportion of quits has exceeded the proportion of layoffs and discharges. Other separations is historically a very small portion of total separations; it has rarely been above 10 percent of total separations.

The proportions of quits and layoffs and discharges were last equal in November 2010. Since then, the proportion of quits has trended upward, again exceeding the proportion of layoffs and discharges. In June, the proportion of quits for total nonfarm was 48 percent and the proportion of layoffs and discharges was 45 percent. The proportions were the same for total private with 48 percent quits and 45 percent layoffs and discharges. For government, the proportions were 39 percent quits and 39 percent layoffs and discharges. (See table C below.)

Net Change in Employment Over the 12 months ending in June, not seasonally adjusted data totaled 47.7 million hires and 46.7 million separations, yielding a net employment gain of 1.0 million. These figures include workers who may have been hired and separated more than once during the year. Nearly half of the hires and nearly half of the separations during these 12 months occurred in three industries: retail trade; professional and business services; and accommodation and food services. The large share of total hires and separations accounted for by these three industries reflects the size of the industries as well as their relatively high hires and separations rates.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Aug 10, 2011.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Separate job openings from hiring

JOLTS measures unfilled openings on the last business day of a month, while hires and separations cover the whole month. Openings are not new payroll jobs. Read vacancies alongside hiring, quits and layoffs, and distinguish counts from rates and revised estimates. These measures add detail about labor demand and turnover to the policy discussion. The benchmark window below describes borrowing conditions around publication; it cannot attribute a rate change to this report. BLS Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 11, 2011Publication referenceAug 10, 201130 days laterSep 9, 2011
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®4.60%Observed 4.39%Observed −21 bps vs. earlier reference4.12%Observed −27 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

May 10, 2011 – Nov 10, 2011
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Aug 10, 2011Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.3.50%4.25%5.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 4.63% · May 12, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.61% · May 19, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · May 26, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jun 2, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.49% · Jun 9, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 16, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.50% · Jun 23, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jun 30, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.60% · Jul 7, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.51% · Jul 14, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.52% · Jul 21, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.55% · Jul 28, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.39% · Aug 4, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.32% · Aug 11, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.15% · Aug 18, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Aug 25, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.22% · Sep 1, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Sep 8, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 15, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.09% · Sep 22, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.01% · Sep 29, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.94% · Oct 6, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.12% · Oct 13, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.11% · Oct 20, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.10% · Oct 27, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 4.00% · Nov 3, 201130-year fixed mortgage: 3.99% · Nov 10, 2011May 10, 2011Aug 10, 2011Nov 10, 2011
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,500.51/month

4.39% · Aug 4, 2011

At the later reference$1,453.08/month

4.12% · Sep 8, 2011

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $47.43 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →