Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

October 2001 U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes

The U.S. Import Price Index decreased 2.4 percent in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decline, the largest since the Bureau began monthly publication of this index in 1989, was…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

- OCTOBER 2001-

The U.S. Import Price Index decreased 2.4 percent in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The decline, the largest since the Bureau began monthly publication of this index in 1989, was primarily attributable to a sharp decrease in petroleum prices. The Export Price Index also fell in October, down 0.7 percent, its largest drop since a similar decrease in January 1998. Despite the disruption in the metropolitan Washington mail service, response rates for October were not appreciably different from normal levels.

Import Goods

The 2.4 percent drop in October for import prices followed two months of comparatively little movement and brought the overall decline for the 12 months ended in October to 7.4 percent. October’s decline was led by a 15.7 percent fall in the price index for petroleum and petroleum products, the biggest decline in this component since 1991. From October 2000 to October 2001, the petroleum index dropped 32.5 percent, in contrast to a 42.9 percent increase over October 1999 to October 2000. Meanwhile, the index for nonpetroleum import prices also fell in October, down 0.4 percent. This marked the ninth month in a row this series declined and brought the total drop for the year ended in October 2001 to 3.1 percent.

For nonpetroleum imports, the October decline was led by a continuing downturn in prices for industrial supplies and materials excluding petroleum, which fell 2.6 percent. The decline, the ninth in a row, was led by lower prices for natural gas, nonferrous metals, and lumber. The index for foods, feeds, and beverages, which had edged up in the two prior months after declining earlier in the year, dipped 0.3 percent. In addition, consumer goods edged down 0.1 percent in October, primarily attributable to lower prices for diamonds.

In contrast, prices for automotive vehicles, parts, and engines, up 0.2 percent in October, rose for the second month in a row. The advance was attributable to the year-end model changeovers. The index for capital goods also edged up, 0.1 percent, marking only the second increase in this component in the past year.

Export Goods

The 0.7 percent decline in the price index for overall exports marked a resumption of the recent downward trend in this series, as the small 0.1 percent increase in September had been preceded by decreases in each of the seven prior months. For the year ended in October, export prices were down 2.1 percent. The October decrease was reflected in both major components, with agricultural prices falling 1.7 percent and nonagricultural prices dropping 0.7 percent. The decline in agricultural export prices in October was led by falling prices for soybeans and corn. The monthly decrease in nonagricultural prices was the largest since the series was first published in 1989.

The October decrease in the index for nonagricultural prices was highlighted by a sharp drop in prices for exported fuels and lubricants, down 9.7 percent, as well as smaller decreases in the prices for precious metals. In addition, the index for capital goods—led by a decline in the prices for semiconductors—fell 0.4 percent in October, the largest dip in this component in three years.

The export price index for automotive vehicles was up 0.1 percent in October, coincident with the introduction of the new model year automobiles, while prices of consumer goods, excluding autos, were unchanged.

Imports by Locality of Origin

Import prices from the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries resumed a downward trend in October, falling 0.3 percent after being unchanged in September. Prior to September, the index had declined for eight consecutive months. For the 12 months ended in October the index was down 4.6 percent.

Prices from Latin America and Canada, both heavily influenced by prices of petroleum and other raw materials, fell in October; the Latin America index dropped 3.5 percent, while prices from Canada were down 2.6 percent.

The index of prices from the European Union also was down in October, as a decrease in raw material prices more than offset an increase in prices for manufactured goods.

In contrast, prices from Japan were unchanged, on average, in October, after dipping in each of the three previous months.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF CHANGES IN THE U.S. IMPORT AND EXPORT PRICE INDEXES

Beginning with the release of January 2002 data on February 14, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will make two changes to the U.S. Import and Export Price Indexes. First, all price indexes will be reweighted to 2000 trade weights. Second, these indexes will be rebased from 1995=100 to 2000=100.

The current practice is to update the weights in these price indexes every five years. The new weights will be based on U.S. export and import shipment values for the calendar year 2000 (as reported by the Bureau of the Census) and will be used in the calculation of indexes from January 2002 forward. In addition, as a result of shifts in trade patterns, there also will be minor changes in the publication structure.

In keeping with the program’s policy of using a reference base that is the same as the weight base, all indexes will be rebased from 1995=100 to 2000=100. This impacts the level of the indexes prior to January 2002; however, it should not (except for rounding) cause any adjustments to the percent changes between different time periods.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Nov 8, 2001.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Distinguish trade prices from trade volumes

Import and export price indexes track prices of goods and selected services traded between the United States and other countries. They do not measure how much is traded or the trade balance. Read imports separately from exports and compare fuel with nonfuel import prices where available; also distinguish a monthly movement from a twelve-month change. These measures describe one part of the pricing environment, rather than the household consumer basket. The rate observations below do not establish how much of a later change came from this release. BLS Import and Export Price Indexes overview.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierOct 9, 2001Publication referenceNov 8, 200130 days laterDec 8, 2001
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.64%Observed 6.56%Observed −8 bps vs. earlier reference6.84%Observed +28 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Aug 8, 2001 – Feb 8, 2002
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Nov 8, 2001Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.00%6.75%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.00% · Aug 10, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 17, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Aug 24, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Aug 31, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Sep 7, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.86% · Sep 14, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.80% · Sep 21, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.72% · Sep 28, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.64% · Oct 5, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.58% · Oct 12, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.61% · Oct 19, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.64% · Oct 26, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.56% · Nov 2, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.45% · Nov 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.51% · Nov 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.75% · Nov 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · Nov 30, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.84% · Dec 7, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Dec 14, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Dec 21, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.16% · Dec 28, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Jan 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.06% · Jan 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.83% · Jan 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Jan 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · Feb 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.88% · Feb 8, 2002Aug 8, 2001Nov 8, 2001Feb 8, 2002
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,908.06/month

6.56% · Nov 2, 2001

At the later reference$1,963.78/month

6.84% · Dec 7, 2001

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $55.72 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →