The U.S. Import Price Index was unchanged in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Imported petroleum prices increased after declining in the three previous months but were offset by a…
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics3 min read
Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →
Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.
-MAY 1997-
The U.S. Import Price Index was unchanged in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Imported petroleum prices increased after declining in the three previous months but were offset by a continuing decline in nonpetroleum import prices, down 0.1 percent in May. The U.S. Export Price Index declined 0.2 percent in May.
Import Goods
Import prices were unchanged on average in May after having declined in each of the last four months. Imported petroleum prices rose 1.2 percent in May following large decreases in each of the three prior months. In contrast, nonpetroleum prices fell 0.1 percent, the fifth consecutive decline in this component. For the year ended in May, overall import prices dropped 3.0 percent, attributable to both falling petroleum and nonpetroleum prices, down 9.2 and 2.4 percent, respectively.
The index for capital goods led the decline in nonpetroleum import prices in May, decreasing 0.8 percent. Over the past 12 months, the index for capital goods prices was down 6.2 percent. Imported automotive vehicles also contributed to the May decline in nonpetroleum prices, falling 0.2 percent. For the year ended in May, the index for automotive vehicles fell 0.1 percent.
In contrast, the price index for foods, feeds, and beverages rose 1.7 percent in May, attributable primarily to rising coffee prices. In addition, the import price indexes for nonpetroleum industrial supplies and materials and consumer goods rose 0.1 percent and 0.2 percent in May, respectively.
Export Goods
The 0.2 percent decline in export prices in May followed a 0.7 percent decrease in April. Export prices fell 2.8 percent on average for the year ended in May. Agricultural export prices, down 1.1 percent in May after dropping 6.9 percent in April, led the decline in the export price index for the second consecutive month. Over the past year, the index for agricultural exports has fallen 20.0 percent after rising 24.8 percent the previous year. In contrast, prices for nonagricultural exports remained relatively stable, moving down a modest 0.1 percent in May after rising 0.1 percent in April. Over the past 12 months, the index has not changed by more than 0.2 percent in either direction and was down 0.1 percent over the May 1996-97 period.
The export price indexes for the major finished goods categories displayed little or no movement in May. Capital goods export prices decreased 0.1 percent for the second month in a row. For the year, the index for capital goods, which represents the largest component of U.S. exports, fell 0.5 percent. The price index for exported automotive vehicles also fell 0.1 percent in May, following a 0.3 percent increase in April. Automotive vehicle export prices were up 1.0 percent over the past year.
The price indexes for consumer goods and nonagricultural industrial supplies and materials were up 0.1 percent and unchanged in May, respectively, after both indexes were up 0.1 percent in the prior month. Over the past year, prices for exported consumer goods rose 1.0 percent, while nonagricultural industrial supplies and materials prices decreased 0.3 percent.
Imports by Locality of Origin
Prices for imports from Japan continued to decline in May, down 0.7 percent on average. (See table 7.) The decline matched the index movement in April and was the ninth consecutive monthly decrease. Over the past year, the index was down 5.6 percent.
The index for imports from Canada rose 0.2 percent in May after falling 3.5 percent in the prior three months. For the past 12 months, the index was down 0.9 percent.
Import prices from the European Union rose 0.1 last month after decreasing 1.9 percent over the past three months. For the year ended in May, the index was down 1.3 percent.
Prices of imports from the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries fell 0.2 percent in April after a modest 0.1 percent gain the month before. The index was down 2.8 percent in the May 1996-97 period.
Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.
MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context
The mortgage market around this release
This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.
Distinguish trade prices from trade volumes
Import and export price indexes track prices of goods and selected services traded between the United States and other countries. They do not measure how much is traded or the trade balance. Read imports separately from exports and compare fuel with nonfuel import prices where available; also distinguish a monthly movement from a twelve-month change. These measures describe one part of the pricing environment, rather than the household consumer basket. The rate observations below do not establish how much of a later change came from this release. BLS Import and Export Price Indexes overview.
Nearest published observation on or before each target date
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.
Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.
Six months around publication
Mar 19, 1997 – Sep 19, 1997
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.
What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan
At the publication reference$2,143.02/month
7.72% · Jun 13, 1997
At the later reference$2,091.48/month
7.47% · Jul 18, 1997
The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $51.54 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.
Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.
Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits
Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®: available observations from Apr 2, 1971 through Nov 5, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury: available observations from Jan 4, 2016 through Nov 10, 2026. Cached history snapshot. History retrieved or verified Nov 11, 2026.
The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.
Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.