Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

January 2001 Employment Situation

Unemployment increased in January, and payroll employment rose by 268,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Construction employment increased by 145,000, after seasonal adjustment, as…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Unemployment increased in January, and payroll employment rose by 268,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Construction employment increased by 145,000, after seasonal adjustment, as unusual weather patterns over the last 3 months contributed to extremely light layoffs in January. Manufacturing experienced another sizable employment decline over the month. Average hourly earnings were unchanged.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The number of unemployed rose by about 300,000 to nearly 6.0 million, pushing the unemployment rate from 4.0 to 4.2 percent. The jobless rate had ranged from 3.9 to 4.1 percent since October 1999. The unemployment rates for each of the major worker groups--adult men (3.6 percent), adult women (3.6 percent), teenagers (13.8 percent), whites (3.6 percent), blacks (8.4 percent), and Hispanics (6.0 percent)--were marginally higher in January. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment was essentially unchanged at 136.0 million, seasonally adjusted, in January. The employment-population ratio--the proportion of the population age 16 and older with jobs--was 64.5 percent, unchanged from December. The civilian labor force, 142.0 million, grew by 466,000 and the labor force participation rate rose to 67.3 percent. (See table A-1.)

About 7.1 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job in January. These multiple jobholders represented 5.3 percent of total employment, compared with 5.7 percent a year earlier. (See table A-10.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

About 1.3 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in January, about the same number as a year earlier. These people wanted and were available to work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed, however, because they had not actively searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. The number of discouraged workers was 303,000 in January, up from 234,000 a year earlier. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them. (See table A-10.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 268,000 in January to 132.1 million, seasonally adjusted, following a gain of only 19,000 (as revised) in December. Unusually large employment increases in construction and the federal government (after seasonal adjustment) contributed significantly to the January gain. Large job losses continued in manufacturing, and growth was moderate in services. (See table B-1.)

In the goods-producing sector, construction employment rose by 145,000 in January, after seasonal adjustment. The weather in November and December was particularly severe, resulting in unusually large layoffs in those months. January's weather was relatively mild, and layoffs in outside activities such as roofing, masonry, and heavy construction (such as bridges and highways) were smaller than usual for this time of year. This resulted in a large employment increase, after seasonal adjustment.

Mining added 5,000 jobs in January. Most of the employment gain was due to increases in oil and gas extraction, which has added 29,000 jobs since August 1999.

Employment in manufacturing fell by 65,000 in January. This industry has shed 254,000 jobs since last June. In January, manufacturing job losses were widespread. The largest decline was in motor vehicles, where payrolls were reduced by 38,000, reflecting auto plant shutdowns for inventory control. Employment also fell in fabricated metals (13,000) and in rubber and plastics (4,000). Employment declines continued in lumber, which lost 6,000 jobs in January. Food products gained 11,000 jobs, after losses in November and December.

In the service-producing sector, the services industry added 81,000 jobs in January, slightly below the average monthly gain for the prior 12 months. Declines continued in help supply services, where employment fell by 39,000 in January. Employment in this industry has fallen by 184,000 since last April. In contrast, health services employment rose by 30,000, with increases in hospitals (12,000) and doctor's offices (11,000). Employment in amusement and recreation services rose by 20,000 jobs in January. Engineering and management services added 10,000 jobs, while employment in computer services was little changed.

Employment in retail trade grew modestly in January, with an increase of 27,000. Most of this gain occurred in miscellaneous retail establishments. Employment in wholesale trade declined for the second straight month.

Employment in finance, insurance, and real estate rose by 29,000 in January. Strength in home sales and refinancing activities helped boost employment in real estate by 8,000 and in mortgage banks by 5,000. Insurance added 6,000 jobs in January.

In government, federal employment rose by 37,000 over the month, partly reversing declines in November and December that totaled 55,000. Hiring of postal service workers during the holiday season was lighter than normal, which led to smaller seasonal layoffs than usual in January.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 0.2 hour in January to 34.3 hours, seasonally adjusted, offsetting a 0.2-hour decline in December. The manufacturing workweek increased by 0.5 hour to 40.9 hours, following a decline of 0.8 hour in December that was partly due to severe winter weather across much of the country. Manufacturing overtime, which fell by 0.3 hour in December, rose by 0.1 hour in January to 4.1 hours. Since last July, the factory workweek has fallen by 0.8 hour and overtime by 0.5 hour. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls was up by 0.9 percent to 151.8 (1982=100), seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing index rose by 0.8 percent to 102.6. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls were unchanged in January at $14.02, seasonally adjusted, following 3 months of above-average gains. Average weekly earnings rose by 0.6 percent in January to $480.89. Over the year, average hourly earnings rose by 3.9 percent and average weekly earnings grew by 3.3 percent. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 2, 2001.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 3, 2001Publication referenceFeb 2, 200130 days laterMar 4, 2001
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.13%Observed 7.09%Observed −4 bps vs. earlier reference7.03%Observed −6 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 2, 2000 – May 2, 2001
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 2, 2001Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.25%8.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.73% · Nov 3, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.79% · Nov 10, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.73% · Nov 17, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.73% · Nov 24, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.65% · Dec 1, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.54% · Dec 8, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.42% · Dec 15, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Dec 22, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.13% · Dec 29, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 7.07% · Jan 5, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Jan 12, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · Jan 19, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.15% · Jan 26, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Feb 2, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Feb 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Feb 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.12% · Feb 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.03% · Mar 2, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.97% · Mar 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Mar 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Mar 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.91% · Mar 30, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Apr 6, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.04% · Apr 13, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Apr 20, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.12% · Apr 27, 2001Nov 2, 2000Feb 2, 2001May 2, 2001
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,014.07/month

7.09% · Feb 2, 2001

At the later reference$2,001.96/month

7.03% · Mar 2, 2001

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $12.12 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →