Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

January 2000 Employment Situation

Employment rose in January, and the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 4.0 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 387,000. There were…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Employment rose in January, and the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 4.0 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 387,000. There were sharp increases in construction and in other weather- sensitive industries, due, at least in part, to unseasonably mild weather during the survey reference period. Average hourly earnings rose by 6 cents in January and by 3.5 percent over the year.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The number of unemployed persons was unchanged in January at 5.7 million, and the unemployment rate was about unchanged at 4.0 percent. The jobless rate has been below 4.2 percent since October.

Unemployment rates for the major worker groups--adult men (3.3 percent), adult women (3.7 percent), teenagers (12.6 percent), whites (3.4 percent), blacks (8.2 percent), and Hispanics (5.6 percent)--showed little or no change over the month. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

The number of persons in the civilian labor force grew by 925,000 to 140.9 million in January, after adjustment for the effect of revisions to population controls. Total employment rose by roughly the same amount to 135.2 million. (See table A; also see the note on page 5.) The labor force participation rate increased 0.4 percentage point to 67.5 percent--a record high. The employment-population ratio--the proportion of the population age 16 and older with jobs--rose from 64.4 percent in December to 64.8 percent in January, also a record. (See table A-1.)

About 7.6 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job in January. These multiple jobholders represented 5.7 percent of the total employed, compared with 6.0 percent in January 1999. (See table A-10.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

The number of persons who were marginally attached to the labor force in January totaled 1.2 million (not seasonally adjusted). These people wanted and were available to work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They are not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for employment in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. The number of discouraged workers was 234,000 in January, down from 339,000 a year earlier. These people, a subset of the marginally attached, were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them. (See table A-10.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 387,000 in January to 130.3 million, seasonally adjusted. In January, large job gains in construction and services were accompanied by a small increase in manufacturing employment. (See table B-1.)

In the goods-producing sector, construction employment rose by 116,000 in January, after seasonal adjustment. This increase reflects, in part, unseasonably mild weather across the country during the survey reference period. The gains within construction were widespread, but the largest were in those industries most influenced by the weather--heavy construction and the concrete, masonry, and roofing trades.

Manufacturing added 13,000 jobs in January, following 2 months with almost no change. Factory employment had been on a clear downward trend from the spring of 1998 through mid-1999, but job losses moderated during the second half of 1999. In January, the largest employment increases within manu- facturing occurred in electrical equipment and in motor vehicles (8,000 each). Several construction-related manufacturing industries, such as plywood, concrete, and fabricated structural metals, also had employment increases. Partially offsetting the job gains were continued declines in industrial machinery, aircraft, textiles, and apparel.

Within the mining industry, employment in oil and gas extraction continued its recent slow improvement. Oil and gas extraction has added 9,000 jobs since August; it had lost 68,000 jobs from March 1998 to June 1999.

In the service-producing sector, employment in the services industry grew by 152,000 in January, above the average monthly gain for 1999 (121,000). In January, business services added 63,000 jobs. Within business services, computer and data processing services employment increased by 22,000, following 4 consecutive months of below-average gains. Agricultural services, including landscaping, posted a large job gain, perhaps reflecting the relatively mild weather during the survey reference period. Following a decline in December, employment in amusement and recreation services grew by 29,000. Health services and social services both experienced above-average gains in January, adding 23,000 and 21,000 jobs, respectively. Employment in hotels declined sharply over the month.

Retail trade added 43,000 jobs in January. Job gains occurred in miscellaneous retail establishments (20,000), apparel and accessory stores (16,000), and automotive dealers and service stations (13,000), but there was a sizable employment decline in department stores (-33,000). Employment in wholesale trade rose by 19,000 over the month.

Transportation and public utilities added 16,000 jobs in January, mainly in transportation. Job growth was above average in air transportation and in local and interurban transit.

The federal government added 20,000 jobs over the month; temporary workers hired for the decennial census accounted for 11,000 jobs.

Employment in finance, insurance, and real estate declined in January. Among the component industries, only securities brokerages and real estate added jobs over the month. Within finance, the largest decline was in mortgage brokerages (-7,000), where 23,000 jobs have been lost since May.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls edged up by 0.1 hour in January to 34.6 hours, seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing workweek also was up by 0.1 hour to 41.7 hours. Manufacturing overtime edged down 0.1 hour to 4.6 hours. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls increased by 0.6 percent to 150.2 (1982=100), seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing index was up by 0.5 percent to 106.2. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 6 cents in January to $13.50, seasonally adjusted. Following gains of 13 cents in each of the first 2 quarters of 1999, average hourly earnings growth was 11 cents in the third quarter, and 9 cents in the fourth quarter (as revised). Over the month, average weekly earnings rose by 0.7 percent to $467.10, seasonally adjusted. Over the year, both average hourly earnings and average weekly earnings rose by 3.5 percent. (See table B-3.)

Revisions to Population Estimates for the Household Survey

Effective with the release of data for January 2000, revised population controls, primarily reflecting updated information on immigration, have been introduced into the household survey. The revised controls resulted in a decrease in the estimated size of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years of age and over.

Official population and labor force estimates for December 1999 and earlier months will not be revised. To assess the impact of the revised population controls on trend growth, however, December estimates for selected data series were recalculated using the new controls, and the differences from estimates based on the old controls are shown below. The population revisions decreased the estimated size of the civilian labor force by 123,000 and of employment by 117,000; the revisions had a negligible impact on unemployment rates and other percentage estimates. An article describing the population revisions and their effect on national labor force estimates will appear in the February 2000 issue of Employment and Earnings.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 4, 2000.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 5, 2000Publication referenceFeb 4, 200030 days laterMar 5, 2000
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.06%Observed 8.25%Observed +19 bps vs. earlier reference8.27%Observed +2 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 4, 1999 – May 4, 2000
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 4, 2000Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.00%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Nov 5, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.67% · Nov 12, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.69% · Nov 19, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.75% · Nov 26, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Dec 3, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.84% · Dec 10, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.86% · Dec 17, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.96% · Dec 24, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 8.06% · Dec 31, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 8.15% · Jan 7, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.18% · Jan 14, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.26% · Jan 21, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.25% · Jan 28, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.25% · Feb 4, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.36% · Feb 11, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.38% · Feb 18, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.31% · Feb 25, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.27% · Mar 3, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Mar 10, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.24% · Mar 17, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Mar 24, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Mar 31, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.20% · Apr 7, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.12% · Apr 14, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Apr 21, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.13% · Apr 28, 2000Nov 4, 1999Feb 4, 2000May 4, 2000
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,253.80/month

8.25% · Feb 4, 2000

At the later reference$2,258.02/month

8.27% · Mar 3, 2000

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $4.22 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →