Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

January 1999 Employment Situation

Employment rose in January and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.3 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Nonfarm payroll employment rose by 245,000, about in line with the average…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Employment rose in January and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.3 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Nonfarm payroll employment rose by 245,000, about in line with the average for the prior 12 months. Gains occurred in most major industry divisions. Average hourly earnings increased by 6 cents.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The number of unemployed persons, 6.0 million, was about unchanged in January, and the unemployment rate held at 4.3 percent, seasonally adjusted. The jobless rate has remained within a narrow range of 4.3 to 4.5 percent since last April. Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rate for Hispanics fell to 6.6 percent in January. The jobless rates for the other major demographic groups--adult men (3.4 percent), adult women (3.7 percent), teenagers (15.5 percent), whites (3.8 percent), and blacks (7.8 percent)--showed little or no change over the month. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment rose by 814,000 in January after adjustment for the effect of revisions to population controls. (See the note on page 5.) The employment-population ratio--the proportion of the population age 16 and older with jobs--reached a record 64.5 percent, up 0.3 percentage point from the previous month. (See table A-1.)

The civilian labor force increased by 742,000, again after adjustment for the effect of population control revisions. The labor force participation rate rose to 67.4 percent, also a record. (See table A-1.)

Approximately 7.9 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) held more than one job in January. These multiple jobholders comprised 6.0 percent of total employment, the same rate as a year earlier. (See table A-10.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

About 1.4 million persons (not seasonally adjusted) were marginally attached to the labor force in January. These were people who wanted and were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months but were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey.

The number of discouraged workers--a subset of the marginally attached who were not currently looking for work specifically because they believed no jobs were available for them--was 339,000 in January, about the same as a year earlier. (See table A-10.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment, at 127.3 million, seasonally adjusted, increased by 245,000 in January, about equal to the average gain over the prior 12 months. Employment growth was widespread in the service-producing sector, and the construction industry added jobs despite unusually adverse winter weather in some parts of the country. Job losses continued in manufacturing and mining. (See table B-1.)

The services industry added 114,000 jobs in January, in line with its average for the prior 12 months. Employment in business services rose by 48,000 in January. Strong growth continued in computer and data processing services, which added 17,000 jobs. In contrast, employment growth in help supply services remained sluggish. Engineering and management services registered a relatively large over-the-month employment increase (27,000) in January and continued on its strong growth trend. Social services continued its steady growth, adding 10,000 jobs. Health services experienced its third consecutive month of slower growth, adding only 6,000 jobs. A decline in home health care employment largely offset a gain in offices and clinics of doctors. A January job gain of 13,000 in amusements and recreation reversed a decline of similar magnitude in December.

Retail trade employment increased by 30,000 in January. January is the month when retail stores lay off most of the workers who were hired for the holiday shopping season. Department stores had stronger-than-usual employment build-up for the holidays, so there were more people to let go in January. As a result, employment declined by 31,000, after seasonal adjustment. In contrast, apparel stores and miscellaneous general merchandise stores, such as bookstores, jewelry stores, and gift shops, had below-normal holiday hiring. This led to fewer-than-usual layoffs in January and large employment increases, after seasonal adjustment. These gains largely offset the decline in department stores. A second month of strong employment gains in building supply stores reflected the strength in construction activity.

Wholesale trade employment rose by 28,000 in January, following a small increase in December. A large gain in the nondurable goods component (20,000) was led by grocery wholesaling. In durable goods distribution, professional and commercial equipment accounted for the increase.

Employment in transportation and public utilities rose by 22,000 in January, after seasonal adjustment. Within transportation, trucking added 12,000 jobs; this was the second consecutive month of above-average growth in the industry. Telephone companies continued to lead the growth in communications, which added 11,000 jobs in January.

Finance, insurance, and real estate added 22,000 jobs in January. Within finance, the over-the-month gain of 11,000 was spread among the various types of banks, brokerages, and other investment offices. In real estate, employment also increased by 11,000 in January, more than twice the average monthly gain for the prior 12 months. This industry has benefited from low mortgage rates. In contrast, for the first time in two years, insurance did not add jobs.

Local government employment increased by 35,000 in January, with both the educational and noneducational components adding jobs. State and federal government employment levels were essentially unchanged.

In the goods-producing sector, construction employment continued to rise, after seasonal adjustment. January's gain of 15,000 jobs was substantially smaller than December's large increase. Exceptionally severe weather in the upper Midwest and Northeast during the January survey reference period curtailed construction activity in those parts of the country. Outdoor construction activity--roofing and masonry within special trades and the highway portion of heavy construction--was most affected by the bad weather. In contrast, employment growth among general building contractors was strong for the second month in a row.

Manufacturing employment continued to decline in January, although the loss of 13,000 jobs was the smallest since September. Industrial machinery has experienced steep declines, losing 15,000 jobs in January and 69,000 since March. Electronic equipment employment also continued to decline, dropping by 6,000 jobs in January; this was slightly less than the average loss for the prior six months. Employment in the apparel industry also continued downward in January, falling by 8,000. Since its most recent peak in November 1991, employment in apparel manufacturing has dropped by 294,000, or 29 percent. In January, lumber had a particularly large job increase (8,000), reflecting construction's strength. Fabricated metals showed its first employment increase since August, and motor vehicles had its first job gain since October. Food products and rubber and miscellaneous plastics also had employment increases in January; gains in these industries over the past three months offset losses sustained in mid- 1998. Mining continued its long-term downward trend in January, losing 9,000 jobs. In recent months, employment declines have accelerated in oil and gas extraction.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls edged down by 0.1 hour in January to 34.5 hours, seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing workweek decreased by 0.2 hour to 41.5 hours, while factory overtime was 4.5 hours for the fifth consecutive month. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged at 146.2 (1982=100), seasonally adjusted. The manufacturing index decreased by 0.6 percent in January to 106.8, reflecting the decrease in the factory workweek. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 6 cents in January to $13.04, seasonally adjusted. Average weekly earnings increased by 0.2 percent to $449.88. Over the year, average hourly and weekly earnings have risen by 4.0 percent and 3.1 percent, respectively. (See table B-3.)

Revisions to Population Estimates for the Household Survey

Effective with the release of data for January 1999, revised population controls, primarily reflecting updated information on immigration, have been introduced into the household survey. The revised controls resulted in an increase of 307,000 in the estimated size of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years of age and over for December 1998. The impact on the population varied by demographic group. (See table below.)

The revised controls increased the estimated size of the civilian labor force and of employment by about 60,000 each, with more substantial, but offsetting, changes among population subgroups. The population revisions had a negligible impact on unemployment rates and other percentage estimates. An article describing these revisions and their effect on national labor force estimates will appear in the February 1999 issue of Employment and Earnings.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Feb 5, 1999.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 6, 1999Publication referenceFeb 5, 199930 days laterMar 7, 1999
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.83%Observed 6.75%Observed −8 bps vs. earlier reference7.06%Observed +31 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Nov 5, 1998 – May 5, 1999
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Feb 5, 1999Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.50%7.00%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Nov 6, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.93% · Nov 13, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.86% · Nov 20, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.78% · Nov 27, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Dec 4, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.69% · Dec 11, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.69% · Dec 18, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.77% · Dec 25, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.83% · Dec 31, 199830-year fixed mortgage: 6.79% · Jan 8, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.83% · Jan 15, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.78% · Jan 22, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.74% · Jan 29, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.75% · Feb 5, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.77% · Feb 12, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.82% · Feb 19, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · Feb 26, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.06% · Mar 5, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.11% · Mar 12, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 7.01% · Mar 19, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Mar 26, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.98% · Apr 2, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.92% · Apr 9, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.87% · Apr 16, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.88% · Apr 23, 199930-year fixed mortgage: 6.93% · Apr 30, 1999Nov 5, 1998Feb 5, 1999May 5, 1999
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,945.79/month

6.75% · Feb 5, 1999

At the later reference$2,008.01/month

7.06% · Mar 5, 1999

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $62.22 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →