Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

June 1995 Employment Situation

Employment increased in June and unemployment was about unchanged, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 215,000, with the most noteworthy gains in the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Employment increased in June and unemployment was about unchanged, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 215,000, with the most noteworthy gains in the services and construction industries. Manufacturing employment, however, continued to shrink. The unemployment rate in June was 5.6 percent; the rate has fluctuated between 5.4 and 5.8 percent thus far this year.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

Both the number of unemployed persons and the unemployment rate were essentially unchanged in June at 7.4 million and 5.6 percent, respectively. None of the jobless rates for the major worker groups--adult men (4.8 percent), adult women (5.0 percent), teenagers (16.4 percent), whites (4.8 percent), blacks (10.6 percent), and Hispanics (9.0 percent)--was materially different from May levels. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

The number of persons seeking work for 15 weeks or longer declined over the month to 2.3 million. Both the mean and median duration of unemployment each fell to its lowest level in about 3-1/2 years. (See table A-5.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment in June, at 124.5 million, was little different from the May level (after seasonal adjustment). The employment-population ratio--the proportion of the working-age population with jobs--was 62.7 percent, unchanged from May and 0.6 percentage point lower than its recent high in March. (See table A-1.)

A total of 7.9 million workers (not seasonally adjusted), or 6.2 percent of all employed persons, held two or more jobs in June. A year earlier, 5.7 percent of the employed held more than one job. (See table A-8.)

At 131.9 million, seasonally adjusted, the civilian labor force was about unchanged in June. The labor force participation rate was 66.4 percent. So far in 1995, virtually no net labor force growth has been recorded by the household survey. (See table A-1.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

The number of persons with a marginal attachment to the labor force-- those who wanted and were available for work, but were no longer actively looking for jobs after having searched sometime in the past 12 months--was 1.6 million (not seasonally adjusted) in June. Of that total, those who were not looking because they believed that there were no jobs available for them--discouraged workers--numbered 364,000, well below the level of a year earlier. (See table A-8.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment rose by 215,000 in June, after seasonal adjustment, following little change in the prior 2 months. About half of the increase occurred in the services industry, and there also was a sizable job gain in construction. (See table B-1.)

The construction industry added 42,000 jobs in June, after seasonal adjustment, partially recouping the employment declines in April and May. Some of the June increase likely reflected drier weather over much of the country. Nevertheless, the overall hiring pace in the industry remains sluggish so far this year, compared with the same period last year.

Employment in manufacturing fell by 40,000 in June (seasonally adjusted), the third consecutive decrease. Since March, manufacturing has lost 104,000 jobs. Over-the-month declines were widespread, with the largest job losses occurring in the apparel and transportation equipment industries. Mining employment was little changed in June, but has generally been drifting downward since mid-1990.

The services industry added 114,000 jobs in June, in line with the average monthly gain in the industry before the lull in job growth in the prior 2 months. Sizable over-the-month increases occurred in amusement and recreation, health, engineering and management, and educational services. Employment in business services also expanded in June, but growth in the industry has slowed considerably since early this year and employment in its help supply component has actually declined.

Retail trade employment rose slightly in June, but the industry has shown virtually no net job growth thus far in 1995. The transportation and public utilities industry added 18,000 jobs in June, mostly in trucking and air transportation.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 0.3 hour in June, nearly offsetting the decline in May. The manufacturing workweek edged up in June to 41.5 hours, while factory overtime slipped to 4.2 hours. Both of the manufacturing series are down 0.7 hour since January of this year. (See table B-2.)

The index of aggregate weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls rose 0.8 percent over the month to 132.3 (1982=100). The manufacturing index was about unchanged at 106.6. (See table B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of private production or nonsupervisory workers were up 5 cents in June to $11.43, seasonally adjusted, following a small decline in May. Average weekly earnings rose by 1.3 percent to $394.34, reversing a similarly sized decrease in May. Over the past year, average hourly and weekly earnings increased by 3.1 and 2.5 percent, respectively. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jul 7, 1995.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJun 7, 1995Publication referenceJul 7, 199530 days laterAug 6, 1995
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.71%Observed 7.63%Observed −8 bps vs. earlier reference7.82%Observed +19 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Apr 7, 1995 – Oct 7, 1995
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jul 7, 1995Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.00%7.75%8.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 8.41% · Apr 7, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.37% · Apr 14, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.24% · Apr 21, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.26% · Apr 28, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.27% · May 5, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.87% · May 12, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · May 19, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · May 26, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.71% · Jun 2, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.51% · Jun 9, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.55% · Jun 16, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.53% · Jun 23, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.53% · Jun 30, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.63% · Jul 7, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.41% · Jul 14, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.60% · Jul 21, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.79% · Jul 28, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.82% · Aug 4, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.80% · Aug 11, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.94% · Aug 18, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.88% · Aug 25, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.76% · Sep 1, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.63% · Sep 8, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.60% · Sep 15, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.57% · Sep 22, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.62% · Sep 29, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.57% · Oct 6, 1995Apr 7, 1995Jul 7, 1995Oct 7, 1995
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,124.41/month

7.63% · Jul 7, 1995

At the later reference$2,163.77/month

7.82% · Aug 4, 1995

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $39.35 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →