Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

February 1995 Employment Situation

Employment continued to increase in February and unemployment returned to December levels, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The unemployment rate fell back to 5.4 percent; in January, the…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

Employment continued to increase in February and unemployment returned to December levels, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The unemployment rate fell back to 5.4 percent; in January, the rate had been 5.7 percent.

Nonfarm payroll employment, as measured by the survey of employers, rose by 318,000, with substantial increases in services and retail trade and continued growth in manufacturing. Total employment, as measured by the household survey, also had a large gain. Average hourly earnings showed no change in February, following a marked rise in January.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The unemployment rate dropped by 0.3 percentage point to 5.4 percent in February, after rising by the same amount in January. At 7.2 million, the number of unemployed also was at the same level as in December. Since January 1994, the unemployment level has declined by 1.6 million and the jobless rate has fallen by 1.3 percentage points. (See table A-1.)

Adult men accounted for the bulk of the February decline in unemployment, just as they had accounted for much of the increase in the prior month. As a result, their unemployment rate (4.6 percent) was about the same as in December. Jobless rates for Hispanics (8.9 percent) and whites (4.7 percent) decreased, while the rates for adult women (4.8 percent), teenagers (17.6 percent), and blacks (10.1 percent) were little changed. (See tables A-1 and A-2.)

The number of persons unemployed for 27 weeks or more decreased by 146,000 in February to 1.2 million. Since January 1994, the number of long-term unemployed has declined by about half a million. (See table A-5.)

Total Employment and the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

Total employment rose by 486,000 to 125.1 million in February (seasonally adjusted). The number of employed persons has increased by 3.2 million since January 1994. After remaining flat for 3 months, the employment-population ratio--the proportion of the working-age population with jobs--increased slightly over the month to 63.2 percent, one full percentage point above the proportion in January 1994. (See table A-1.)

A total of 7.7 million workers (not seasonally adjusted), or 6.3 percent of all employed persons, held two or more jobs in February. A year earlier, 5.8 percent of the employed held more than one job. (See table A-8.)

At 132.3 million, seasonally adjusted, the civilian labor force was little changed in February, as was the labor force participation rate of 66.9 percent. Since January 1994, the labor force has increased by 1.7 million. (See table A-1.)

Persons Not in the Labor Force (Household Survey Data)

The number of persons with a marginal attachment to the labor force-- those who wanted and were available for work, but were no longer actively looking for jobs after having searched sometime in the past 12 months--was 1.7 million (not seasonally adjusted) in February. Of that total, those who were not looking because they believed that there were no jobs available for them--discouraged workers--numbered 439,000, about the same level as a year ago. (See table A-8.)

Industry Payroll Employment (Establishment Survey Data)

Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 318,000 in February to 115.6 million. Large increases in the services and retail trade industries accounted for the bulk of this gain, but there also was a continuation of growth in manufacturing jobs. Since hitting a low 3 years ago, payroll jobs have risen by 7-1/2 million. (See table B-1.)

The services industry added 191,000 jobs in February, the largest gain for the industry in nearly a year. A sizable share of this increase occurred in business services (73,000), mostly in personnel supply and computer services. Engineering and management services was particularly strong in February as well, and health services and motion pictures continued to add jobs. The return of more normal winter weather led to a resurgence of winter sports activity and thus a rebound in employment in amusement and recreation services.

Retail trade employment increased by 73,000 in February. Three- fourths of this job gain took place in eating and drinking places, which had shown a small decline in January. A notable advance occurred in automotive dealers and service stations; this industry has grown by 125,000 jobs over the past year. Wholesale trade employment continued its strong uptrend, adding 22,000 jobs in February, with its durable goods component accounting for most of the gain.

Manufacturing employment rose by 27,000 in February, slightly below the growth of recent months. The over-the-month increase was essentially limited to the durable goods sector, particularly fabricated metals, industrial machinery, electronic equipment, and transportation equipment. Among nondurable goods industries, only printing and publishing showed a large job gain. In contrast, employment in apparel fell substantially over the month, continuing its long-term decline.

The construction industry lost 32,000 jobs over the month on a seasonally adjusted basis, reflecting the shift from unusually mild weather in January to more normal winter conditions in February. In spite of this decline, construction employment was up by 314,000 over the past year. Elsewhere, transportation and public utilities resumed its employment advance after failing to add jobs in January. Government employment was little changed overall, although the Federal government continued downsizing, with a loss of 10,000 jobs in February. Federal payrolls have declined by 159,000 since the most recent peak in April 1992.

Weekly Hours (Establishment Survey Data)

The average workweek for production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls decreased by 0.4 hour to 34.5 hours (seasonally adjusted) in February, following an increase of 0.3 hour in the previous month. The manufacturing workweek edged down (by 0.1 hour) to a still very high 42.1 hours, and factory overtime held at a record 4.9 hours. The index of aggregate weekly hours declined by 0.8 percent to 131.3 (1982=100) in February. The manufacturing index was unchanged at 107.6. (See tables B-2 and B-5.)

Hourly and Weekly Earnings (Establishment Survey Data)

Average hourly earnings of private production or nonsupervisory workers were unchanged over the month at $11.31 (seasonally adjusted), following a large increase in January. Average weekly earnings declined by 1.1 percent to $390.20, reflecting the shorter workweek. Over the past year, average hourly earnings increased by 2.5 percent and average weekly earnings rose by 3.1 percent. (See table B-3.)

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Mar 10, 1995.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read beyond one jobs number

The Employment Situation combines two surveys: establishment data measure payroll jobs, hours and earnings, while household data measure people’s employment status and the unemployment rate. A payroll-job change and an unemployment-rate change therefore answer different questions. Check the reference period, participation and revisions alongside the headline. Labor-market conditions inform the policy outlook, but a later mortgage-rate change can reflect many developments; this calendar window cannot identify the report as its cause. BLS Employment Situation tables and technical notes.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierFeb 8, 1995Publication referenceMar 10, 199530 days laterApr 9, 1995
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.94%Observed 8.62%Observed −32 bps vs. earlier reference8.41%Observed −21 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Dec 10, 1994 – Jun 10, 1995
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Mar 10, 1995Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.7.50%8.50%9.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 9.25% · Dec 16, 199430-year fixed mortgage: 9.18% · Dec 23, 199430-year fixed mortgage: 9.18% · Dec 30, 199430-year fixed mortgage: 9.22% · Jan 6, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 9.19% · Jan 13, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 9.05% · Jan 20, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 9.13% · Jan 27, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.94% · Feb 3, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.80% · Feb 10, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.84% · Feb 17, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.73% · Feb 24, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.53% · Mar 3, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.62% · Mar 10, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.38% · Mar 17, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.40% · Mar 24, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.38% · Mar 31, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.41% · Apr 7, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.37% · Apr 14, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.24% · Apr 21, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.26% · Apr 28, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 8.27% · May 5, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.87% · May 12, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.83% · May 19, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.85% · May 26, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.71% · Jun 2, 199530-year fixed mortgage: 7.51% · Jun 9, 1995Dec 10, 1994Mar 10, 1995Jun 10, 1995
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,332.30/month

8.62% · Mar 10, 1995

At the later reference$2,287.63/month

8.41% · Apr 7, 1995

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $44.67 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →