Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

December 2001 Employment Cost Index

The Employment Cost Index (not seasonally adjusted) for December 2001 was 156.8 (June 1989=100), an increase of 4.1 percent from December 2000, the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The Employment…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Employment Cost Index (not seasonally adjusted) for December 2001 was 156.8 (June 1989=100), an increase of 4.1 percent from December 2000, the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The Employment Cost Index (ECI), a component of the Bureau's National Compensation Survey, measures changes in compensation costs, which include wages, salaries, and employer costs for employee benefits.

Quarterly changes, seasonally adjusted

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the 3-month increase in compensation costs for civilian workers (nonfarm private industry plus State and local government) was 0.9 percent during the September-December 2001 period, following a gain of 1.0 percent in June-September 2001. Wages and salaries increased 0.8 percent during the December 2001 period, identical to the change in the previous 3-month period. Benefit costs rose 1.2 percent during the December 2001 quarter, falling from the 1.6 percent gain in the September 2001 quarter.

The 3-month increase in compensation costs for private industry workers was 1.0 percent during the September-December 2001 period, following an increase of 0.9 percent during the previous 3-month period. The gain in wages and salaries was 0.9 percent in the quarter ended in December; in the September quarter, it was 0.7 percent. Benefit costs showed a 3-month rise of 1.3 percent during the December 2001 quarter, compared with a 1.4 percent gain during the September 2001 quarter. The increase in benefit costs continued to be largely due to increases in employer costs for health insurance. (See tables A and 1.)

Compensation costs for State and local government workers increased 0.6 percent during the September-December 2001 period, falling significantly from the 1.4 percent increase in the June-September period. Wages and salaries rose 0.5 percent in the quarter ended in December, following a 1.0 percent increase the previous quarter. Benefit costs rose 0.6 percent during the December quarter, dropping sharply from the 2.4 percent gain in the September quarter. The slower increase in benefit costs was largely due to smaller increases in employer costs for health insurance and retirement benefits.

Over-the-year changes, not seasonally adjusted

Compensation costs for civilian workers (not seasonally adjusted) increased 4.1 percent for the 12 months ended in December 2001. This compares with over-the-year increases of 4.1 percent in December 2000 and 3.4 percent in December 1999. Compensation costs in private industry rose 4.2 percent in the year ended December 2001, compared with increases of 4.4 percent in December 2000 and 3.4 percent in December 1999. In State and local government, compensation costs increased 4.2 percent for the year ended December 2001; over-the-year increases were 3.0 percent in December 2000 and 3.4 percent in December 1999. (See tables B, 2, and 3.)

Nonfarm private industry

In private industry, wages and salaries rose 3.8 percent for the year ended December 2001, after increasing 3.9 percent in the year ended December 2000. (See tables B and 6.) Benefit costs for private industry workers increased 5.1 percent for the year ended in December 2001, compared with an increase of 5.6 percent in December 2000. (See chart A and tables B and 8.)

In private industry, over-the-year compensation cost increases were 4.2 percent for white-collar occupations, 3.8 percent for blue-collar occupations, and 4.5 percent for service occupations. Among the occupational groups, increases in compensation costs ranged from 3.2 percent for machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors to 4.8 percent for administrative support, including clerical workers. (See table 3.)

For the year ended December 2001, the compensation cost increase was 3.8 percent for goods-producing industries, compared with a 4.4 percent increase for the year ended December 2000. The over-the-year increase in compensation for service-producing industries was 4.3 percent, compared with a 4.4 percent increase for the year ended December 2000. Among service-producing industry divisions, December 2000-to-December 2001 increases ranged from 3.3 percent for wholesale trade to 6.1 percent for hospitals. (See table 3.)

Compensation costs for union workers rose 4.2 percent over the year, compared with a 4.1 percent increase for nonunion workers. In service- producing industries, union compensation increased 5.3 percent, greater than the 4.1 percent increase for nonunion workers. Conversely, in goods- producing industries, the increase for nonunion workers was 4.0 percent, compared with a 3.1 percent gain for union workers. Among the four geographic regions, increases in compensation costs ranged from 3.5 percent in the Midwest to 5.0 percent in the West. (See table 4.)

State and local government

In State and local government, the December 2001 over-the-year increase in wages and salaries was 3.6 percent, compared with a gain of 3.3 percent for December 2000. The 12-month gain in benefit costs for December 2001 was 5.5 percent, more than double the gain of 2.4 percent for December 2000. (See tables B, 5, and 8.)

The terrorist attacks of September 11 resulted in a tragic loss of lives and significant disruptions in the New York and Washington area economies, as well as disruptions to other businesses outside these directly impacted areas. A review of both the September and December survey responses was undertaken to evaluate the impact of the situation on the ECI survey cooperation rates by industry and any impact of nonresponse on survey estimates. No unusual effects were found. A fact sheet with additional information can be obtained from the Internet site http://www.bls.gov/ect/eciimpac.htm, by e-mail request ocltinfo@bls.gov, or by telephone (202) 691-6199.

ECI data are available on the Compensation Cost Trends page at http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm. To access data using Anonymous FTP, continue to use the Internet address ftp://ftp.bls.gov.

For technical assistance in using the BLS Internet site, send e-mail to webmaster@bls.gov. For ECI data requests, send e-mail to ocltinfo@bls.gov.

The ECI news release is available through an e-mail subscription service. See the subscription link on http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm or http://www.bls.gov/bls/newsrels.htm.

News releases and other information are available from the BLS fax-on- demand service. To request a document fax, call (202) 691-6325. To request a catalog of available documents, select option 2 at the initial voice prompt. To request data found in this news release, enter the following codes:

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Jan 31, 2002.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read compensation costs separately from job growth

The Employment Cost Index tracks changes in employers’ hourly compensation costs, including wages, salaries and benefits. Its fixed employment weights limit the effect of shifts between industries and occupations; it does not count newly created jobs. Compare wage and benefit components, and check whether the quoted change is for three months or twelve months and whether it is seasonally adjusted. Compensation trends are one part of the inflation and policy picture, without determining a particular mortgage rate. BLS Employment Cost Index.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJan 1, 2002Publication referenceJan 31, 200230 days laterMar 2, 2002
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®7.16%Observed 6.96%Observed −20 bps vs. earlier reference6.80%Observed −16 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Oct 31, 2001 – Apr 30, 2002
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Jan 31, 2002Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.6.00%6.75%7.50%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.56% · Nov 2, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.45% · Nov 9, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.51% · Nov 16, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.75% · Nov 23, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · Nov 30, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 6.84% · Dec 7, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.09% · Dec 14, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.17% · Dec 21, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.16% · Dec 28, 200130-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Jan 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.06% · Jan 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.83% · Jan 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.96% · Jan 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.02% · Feb 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.88% · Feb 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.86% · Feb 15, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.81% · Feb 22, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.80% · Mar 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.87% · Mar 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.08% · Mar 15, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.14% · Mar 22, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.18% · Mar 29, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 7.13% · Apr 5, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.99% · Apr 12, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.94% · Apr 19, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.88% · Apr 26, 2002Oct 31, 2001Jan 31, 2002Apr 30, 2002
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,987.85/month

6.96% · Jan 25, 2002

At the later reference$1,955.78/month

6.80% · Mar 1, 2002

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $32.08 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →