Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Jobs · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

March 2000 Employment Cost Index

The Employment Cost Index for March 2000 was 146.5 (June 1989=100), not seasonally adjusted, an increase of 4.3 percent from March 1999, the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The Employment Cost Index…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Employment Cost Index for March 2000 was 146.5 (June 1989=100), not seasonally adjusted, an increase of 4.3 percent from March 1999, the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The Employment Cost Index (ECI) measures changes in compensation costs, which include wages, salaries, and employer costs for employee benefits.

Quarterly changes, seasonally adjusted

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the 3-month increase in compensation costs for civilian workers (nonfarm private industry plus State and local government) was 1.4 percent during the December 1999-March 2000 period, following a gain of 1.0 percent in September-December 1999. Wages and salaries increased 1.1 percent during the December 1999-March 2000 period; in the September-December 1999 period, it was 0.9 percent. Benefit costs rose 2.0 percent during the March 2000 quarter, following a 1.2 percent increase in the December 1999 quarter.

The 3-month increase in compensation costs for private industry workers was 1.5 percent during the December 1999-March 2000 period. The gain in wages and salaries was 1.2 percent in the March quarter; in the December period, it was 0.9 percent. Benefit costs showed a strong 3- month increase of 2.3 percent during the March 2000 quarter, compared with a 1.1 percent increase during the December 1999 period. (See tables A and 1.) The increase in private industry benefit costs was due, in part, to increases in health insurance, supplemental pay, and paid leave.

Compensation costs for State and local government workers increased 0.8 percent during the December 1999-March 2000 period; in the September- December 1999 period, it was 1.1 percent. Wages and salaries rose 0.9 percent in March, following a gain of 1.0 percent in December. Benefit costs increased 1.0 percent in the March quarter; in December, the increase was 1.2 percent.

Over-the-year changes, not seasonally adjusted

Compensation costs for civilian workers (not seasonally adjusted) increased 4.3 percent for the year ended in March 2000. This compares with over-the-year increases of 3.0 percent in March 1999 and 3.3 percent in March 1998. Compensation costs in private industry rose 4.6 percent in the year ending March 2000, following increases of 3.0 percent for March 1999 and 3.5 percent for March 1998. In State and local government, compensation costs increased 3.6 percent for the year ended March 2000; over-the-year increases were 2.9 percent in March 1999 and 2.5 percent in March 1998. (See tables B, 2, and 3.)

Nonfarm private industry

In private industry, wages and salaries rose 4.2 percent for the year ended March 2000, up from a 3.3 percent increase in the year ended March 1999. (See tables B and 6.) Benefit costs for private industry workers increased 5.5 percent for the year ended in March 2000, a significant increase from 2.2 percent in March 1999. (See chart A and tables B and 8.) As with the over-the-quarter increases for private industry, the rise in benefit costs was due, in part, to higher payments for health insurance, supplemental pay, and paid leave.

In private industry, over-the-year compensation cost increases were 4.8 percent for white-collar occupations, 4.2 percent for blue-collar occupations, and 3.2 percent for service occupations. Among the occupational groups, changes in compensation costs ranged from 3.2 percent for service occupations to 6.7 percent for sales occupations. (See table 3.)

For the year ended March 2000, the private industry compensation cost increase was 4.6 percent for service-producing industries, up from 3.1 percent for the year ended March 1999. The over-the-year increase in compensation costs for goods-producing industries was 4.2 percent, up from 2.8 percent the previous year. Among industry divisions, March 1999-to- March 2000 changes ranged from 2.6 percent in transportation to 9.3 percent in banking, savings and loan, and other credit agencies. (See table 3.)

Over-the-year compensation costs for both union and nonunion workers increased significantly, 3.6 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. In service-producing industries, union compensation increased 2.4 percent and nonunion compensation increased 4.9 percent. In goods-producing industries, the increase for union workers was 4.8 percent and the increase for nonunion workers was 4.1 percent. Compensation in blue- collar occupations rose 4.1 percent for union workers and 4.2 percent for nonunion workers. (See table 4.)

State and local government

In State and local government, the March 2000 over-the-year increase in wages and salaries was 3.8 percent, as compared with a 2.9 percent increase in March 1999. Benefit costs in March 2000 increased 3.2 percent. In March 1999, the increase was 2.8 percent. (See tables 5 and 8.)

This release includes annual revisions in seasonally adjusted Employment Cost Index (ECI) data for total compensation, wages and salaries, and benefit costs. Seasonally adjusted data for 1995-1999 were revised to reflect updated seasonal factors. The new seasonal factors and historical listing containing revised seasonally adjusted indexes are available on the Internet site (http://stats.bls.gov/ecthome.htm) or upon request.

In June 2000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics plans to expand the definition of nonproduction bonuses in the ECI to better represent the compensation packages offered to employees. In addition to the traditional types of nonproduction bonuses, such as attendance bonuses and lump sum payments, the ECI will include hiring and referral bonuses. Hiring bonuses are payments made by the employer to induce an individual to accept employment; referral bonuses are made by the employer to an employee for recommending an applicant who is hired by the establishment.

As part of its ongoing research program, the Bureau of Labor Statistics is currently conducting research on stock option plans. This research will be completed in stages. BLS has begun testing the incidence of stock option plans across all industries and occupations. The prevalence of these plans, based on test results and the potential impact on compensation costs, will determine the next stage of research. The results of the incidence survey will be published in late 2000.

ECI data are available on the ECI home page (http://stats.bls.gov/ecthome.htm). To access data using Anonymous FTP, use the Internet address (ftp://ftp.bls.gov).

For technical assistance in using the BLS Internet site, send e-mail to (labstat.helpdesk@bls.gov). For ECI data requests, send e-mail to (ocltinfo@bls.gov).

The ECI news release is now available through an e-mail subscription service. Please see the subscription link on (http://stats.bls.gov/ecthome.htm) or (http://stats.bls.gov/newsrels.htm).

News releases and other information are available from the BLS fax-on- demand service. To request a document fax, call (202) 691-6325. To request a catalog of available documents, select option 2 at the initial voice prompt. To request data found in this news release, enter the following codes:

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Apr 27, 2000.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read compensation costs separately from job growth

The Employment Cost Index tracks changes in employers’ hourly compensation costs, including wages, salaries and benefits. Its fixed employment weights limit the effect of shifts between industries and occupations; it does not count newly created jobs. Compare wage and benefit components, and check whether the quoted change is for three months or twelve months and whether it is seasonally adjusted. Compensation trends are one part of the inflation and policy picture, without determining a particular mortgage rate. BLS Employment Cost Index.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierMar 28, 2000Publication referenceApr 27, 200030 days laterMay 27, 2000
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®8.23%Observed 8.16%Observed −7 bps vs. earlier reference8.62%Observed +46 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

Jan 27, 2000 – Jul 27, 2000
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Apr 27, 2000Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.8.00%8.50%9.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 8.25% · Jan 28, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.25% · Feb 4, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.36% · Feb 11, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.38% · Feb 18, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.31% · Feb 25, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.27% · Mar 3, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Mar 10, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.24% · Mar 17, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Mar 24, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.23% · Mar 31, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.20% · Apr 7, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.12% · Apr 14, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Apr 21, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.13% · Apr 28, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.28% · May 5, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.52% · May 12, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.64% · May 19, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.62% · May 26, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.54% · Jun 2, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.32% · Jun 9, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.22% · Jun 16, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.14% · Jun 23, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.22% · Jun 30, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.16% · Jul 7, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.09% · Jul 14, 200030-year fixed mortgage: 8.21% · Jul 21, 2000Jan 27, 2000Apr 27, 2000Jul 27, 2000
30-year fixed mortgage26 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$2,234.85/month

8.16% · Apr 21, 2000

At the later reference$2,332.30/month

8.62% · May 26, 2000

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $97.46 higher per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

Understand the policy connection →See current advertised mortgage options →