Wednesday, November 11, 2026Mortgage news · Rates & market context

Inflation · ORIGINAL ECONOMIC RELEASE

July 2002 Consumer Price Index

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.1 percent in July, before seasonal adjustment, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The July level of 180.1 (1982-84=100) was…

Historical releaseThe figures below describe the original reporting period. They are not today’s rates or a current economic forecast.Today’s market brief →

THE PRIMARY SOURCE

Read the release

Original source →

Historical release narrative reproduced from the official public-domain source. Statistical tables, standard technical appendices, administrative material and attendance rosters are omitted; formatting is adapted for reading. Figures retain the release's historical context and may have been revised. Consult the linked source for the complete document.

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.1 percent in July, before seasonal adjustment, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The July level of 180.1 (1982-84=100) was 1.5 percent higher than its level in July 2001.

The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) also rose 0.1 percent in July, prior to seasonal adjustment. The July level of 176.1 was 1.3 percent higher than the index in July 2001.

CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI-U rose 0.1 percent in July, the same as in June. The indexes for food and for energy each turned up in July, increasing 0.2 and 0.4 percent, respectively. The index for food at home--up 0.1 percent--recorded its first advance since March. Within energy, an increase of 1.2 percent in the index for petroleum-based energy was partially offset by a 0.4 percent decline in the index for energy services. Excluding food and energy, the CPI-U rose 0.2 percent after increasing 0.1 percent in June. An upturn in the index for communication, coupled with larger increases in the indexes for medical care and for shelter, more than offset a deceleration in the index for tobacco and smoking products.

See pages 3-7 and Table 1C for the release of the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Consumers (C-CPI-U), a new supplemental index of consumer price change.

During the first seven months of 2002, the CPI-U rose at a 2.5 percent seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR). This compares with an increase of 1.6 percent for all of 2001. The index for energy, which declined 13.0 percent in 2001, increased at a 14.5 percent SAAR in the first seven months of 2002. Petroleum-based energy costs increased at a 36.1 percent annual rate, while charges for energy services declined at a 1.6 percent annual rate. The food index has increased at a 1.3 percent SAAR thus far this year, following a 2.8 percent rise for all of 2001. Excluding food and energy, the CPI-U advanced at a 2.0 percent SAAR in the first seven months, following a 2.7 percent rise in all of 2001.

The food and beverages index increased 0.2 percent in July. The index for food at home, which had declined in May and June, increased 0.1 percent in July. Upturns in the July indexes for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, for fruits and vegetables, and for nonalcoholic beverages, each of which had declined in the preceding two months, more than offset downturns in the indexes for cereal and bakery products and for other food at home. The index for dairy products declined for the second consecutive month--down 0.2 percent in July. Within the fruits and vegetables group, the indexes for fresh vegetables and for processed fruits and vegetables increased 1.2 and 1.3 percent, respectively, while the index for fresh fruits fell 0.4 percent. The index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs rose 0.1 percent in July. Declines in prices for beef and for pork were more than offset by increases in prices for poultry and for fish and seafood--up 1.0 and 2.1 percent, respectively. The index for nonalcoholic beverages increased 0.6 percent in July, reflecting upturns in prices for coffee and for carbonated beverages. The index for cereal and bakery products declined 0.2 percent and the index for other food at home fell 0.1 percent. The other two components of the food and beverages index-- food away from home and alcoholic beverages--increased 0.2 and 0.1 percent, respectively,

The index for housing rose 0.1 percent in July. Shelter costs, which increased 0.1 percent in June, rose 0.2 percent in July. Within shelter, the indexes for rent and for owners' equivalent rent each rose 0.3 percent, while the index for lodging away from home decreased 1.1 percent. The index for fuels and utilities declined 0.2 percent in July. The indexes for electricity and for natural gas declined 0.5 and 0.1 percent, respectively, while the index for fuel oil rose 0.9 percent. (Prior to seasonal adjustment, charges for electricity and for natural gas rose 0.6 and 0.1 percent, respectively, while fuel oil prices declined 0.8 percent.) The index for household furnishings and operations was unchanged in July.

The transportation index rose 0.3 percent in July. The index for gasoline rose 1.5 percent in July after increasing 0.4 percent in June. The index for new vehicles was unchanged in July, following declines in each of the six preceding months. The index for used cars and trucks rose 0.5 percent in July. During the last 12 months, the index for new vehicles has declined 1.8 percent and the index for used cars and trucks has fallen 3.5 percent. Airline fares declined for the second consecutive month--down 1.3 percent in July--after advancing in each of the first five months of 2002. During the last 12 months, the index for airline fares has decreased 5.5 percent.

The index for apparel declined 1.0 percent in July, following a 0.9 percent decrease in June. (Prior to seasonal adjustment, apparel prices fell 3.3 percent, reflecting seasonal price discounting of spring-summer apparel.)

The medical care index rose 0.7 percent in July to a level 4.9 percent above its level a year ago. The index for medical care commodities--prescription drugs, nonprescription drugs, and medical supplies--increased 0.4 percent. The index for medical care services rose 0.7 percent in July. Charges for professional services rose 0.8 percent and those for hospital and related services increased 0.4 percent.

The index for recreation increased 0.1 percent in July, after registering declines in each of the two preceding months. Upturns in the indexes for recreational services, for sporting goods, and for pets, pet products and services more than offset a decline in the index for video and audio products and services. Within the recreational services category, the indexes for admissions to movies, theaters, and concerts and for admissions to sporting events rose 1.1 and 1.4 percent, respectively.

The index for education and communication increased 0.7 percent in July. Education costs rose 0.6 percent and the index for communication costs rose 0.9 percent. Within the latter category, the index for postage and delivery services increased 10.1 percent. The index for telephone services rose 0.3 percent, as a 1.6 percent increase in local charges more than offset a 1.2 percent drop in long distance charges. Prices for personal computers and peripheral equipment declined 1.3 percent.

The index for other goods and services, which increased 1.0 percent in June, was virtually unchanged in July. Prices for cigarettes, which increased 4.3 percent in June, declined 0.1 percent in July, as increased discounting of some major brands more than offset excise tax increases in some areas.

CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W)

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers increased 0.2 percent in July.

Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U)

Today, with release of the July CPI, BLS introduced a new measure of consumer prices, the C-CPI-U. In addition to the index for July 2002, monthly data also have been issued for the period from December 1999 through June 2002. For an overview of the behavior of the C-CPI-U during this period, see the note that follows on page 4. Please note that the indexes for the post 2000 period are subject to revision.

The all items C-CPI-U was unchanged in July on a not seasonally adjusted basis. The July level of 105.5 (December 1999=100) was 1.1 percent higher than the index in July 2001. Table 1C contains the most recent indexes for all items and the component series that are published. Data will be published monthly in the CPI Detailed Report and are available on the CPI home page:http://www.bls.gov/cpi/.

Consumer Price Index data for August are scheduled for release on Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 8:30 A.M. (EDT).

DISCUSSION OF THE BEHAVIOR OF THE CHAINED CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR ALL URBAN CONSUMERS (C-CPI-U)

The differences between the C-CPI-U and CPI-U measures of inflation for 2000 and 2001 are notably larger than had been expected based on prior analysis. (A table comparing these published series is available on the BLS web site at http://stats.bls.gov/cpi/superchart1.htm.) In particular, data for the C-CPI-U for the year 2000, which are no longer subject to revision, show that it increased 0.8 percentage point less than the CPI-U. In its announcement of February 2002, the BLS estimated that the C-CPI-U would likely increase at an average annual rate of 0.1 to 0.2 percentage point less than the CPI-U.

There are several factors that may help to explain the large divergence in 2000. First, the simulations used by BLS to anticipate the extent of the difference between the two measures reflected economic conditions in the early 1990s and those conditions may have changed since then. Second, there may be special circumstances for the year 2000.

Changes since 1990. Since the February announcement of the C-CPI-U, the BLS has extended the simulations it presented for 1990-95, in the process correcting minor errors and including the years 1996 through 1999. These updated simulations (available on the BLS web site at http://stats.bls.gov/cpi/superchart2.htm) illustrate two important points. First, the average difference between the simulated CPI-U and C-CPI-U in the 1990-95 period--i.e., more than 0.2 percentage point--was somewhat larger than it had been as earlier estimated. Second, the differences between the two simulated indexes expanded consistently during the 1996-99 period, reaching 0.5 percentage point in 1999.

In 2000, the CPI-U's underlying expenditure weights were about six years old. Under current practice, the BLS will update CPI-U expenditure weights every two years, and with such biennial updating the weights will be, on average, only three years old. To examine the importance of expenditure weight age in 2000, a CPI-U using 1997-98 weights was simulated. That index increased by 3.3 percent during 2000, 0.1 less than the official CPI-U. This suggests that, even if the CPI-U had employed biennial updating in 2000, the difference between it and the C-CPI-U would have been 0.7 percentage point, still well above earlier expectations.

Relative price changes in 2000. Another more likely contributor to the growing gap is increased dispersion in relative component index changes during 2000. In general, the CPI-U and the superlative C-CPI-U will diverge to the extent that (a) component indexes have rates of inflation that differ from each other and (b) expenditure shares reflect a shift in consumer purchases toward those item categories that have fallen in relative price. Therefore, when there is more variation in price movements across component indexes, there is more room for the Laspeyres and superlative indexes to diverge.

Inflation in CPI component indexes varied more widely during 2000 than during the preceding several years. The variability of December-to- December component index changes was computed for each year in the historical simulation data base, weighted by component expenditure shares in that year. Calculated in this way, the variability rose in each year from 1998 through 2000, and was higher in each of those years than in any year from 1992-1997.

Two examples of indexes with unusual index movements in 2000 were computers and natural gas. The indexes in the expenditure class consisting of personal computers and other information-processing goods and services fell sharply in 2000. The series for personal computers and peripheral equipment dropped by 22.7 percent, and for the expenditure class as a whole the December-to-December decline was 15.6 percent. By contrast, the CPI-U index for utility natural gas rose 36.7 percent in 2000.

The significance of the component series can be seen by excluding them from the CPI-U and C-CPI-U calculations. When we do this, the divergence between the two aggregate indexes drops to 0.4 percentage point, a gap more nearly consistent with the historical range. In the C-CPI-U, the upward price movement for natural gas and the downward movement for the information processing category effectively cancel each other out, and with these components deleted the overall index change for 2000 remains at 2.6 percent. By contrast, the estimate for 2000 in a 1997- 98 weighted CPI-U is lowered from 3.3 to 3.0 percent.

Comparison with other series. The 2000 results for the C-CPI-U, and the gap between that index and the CPI-U, can also be compared to the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price indexes published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) of the Department of Commerce. Between December 1999 and December 2000, the published PCE index, which uses a chain superlative formula, rose 2.5 percent, only 0.1 percentage point less than the C-CPI-U increase. The BEA also produces a quarterly PCE series using fixed 1996 weights for comparison purposes. As is the case with the CPI data series, the difference between the fixed weight and superlative PCE measures widened consistently in the 1996-2000 period. Between the fourth quarters of 1999 and 2000, the chain PCE index rose by 2.5 percent and the fixed-weight index by 3.0 percent.

More recent data. The gap between the superlative and fixed-weight PCE measures narrowed after 2000, and the same is true in CPI data. For the 12-month period ending December 2001, the gap between the C-CPI-U increase and the CPI-U increase previously reported is smaller than for the corresponding period in 2000 (0.6 percentage point compared to 0.8 percentage point). For the 12 months ending July 2002, the C-CPI-U increased by 1.1 percent, compared to the CPI-U increase of 1.5 percent. It must be emphasized, however, that the 2001 and 2002 C-CPI-U data are subject to revision, and the revised data could lead to either higher or lower inflation estimates for those years.

NOTE ON A NEW, SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX OF CONSUMER PRICE CHANGE

The Bureau of Labor Statistics began publishing a consumer price index (CPI) called the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, effective with release of July data on August 16, 2002. Designated the C-CPI-U, the index supplements the existing indexes already produced by the BLS: the CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and the CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).

The C-CPI-U employs a Tornqvist formula and utilizes expenditure data in adjacent time periods in order to reflect the effect of any substitution that consumers make across item categories in response to changes in relative prices. The new measure, said to be a "superlative" index, is designed to be a closer approximation to a "cost-of-living" index than the CPI-U and CPI-W. The use of expenditure data for both a base period and the current period in order to average price change across item categories distinguishes the C-CPI-U from the other CPI measures, which use only a single expenditure base period to compute the price change over time. In 1999, the BLS introduced a geometric mean estimator for averaging prices within most of the index's item categories in order to approximate the effect of consumers' responses to changes in relative prices within these item categories. The geometric mean estimator is used in the C-CPI-U in the same item categories in which it is now used in the CPI-U and CPI-W. (See Monthly Labor Review, October 1998, pp. 3-7.)

Expenditure data required for the calculation of the C-CPI-U are available only with a time lag. Thus, the C-CPI-U is being issued first in preliminary form using the latest available expenditure data at this time and will be subject to two subsequent revisions. Accordingly, with release of the July data, "final" values of the C-CPI-U have been issued for the 12 months of 2000, "interim" values have been issued for the 12 months of 2001, and "initial" values have been issued for January-July 2of 2002. In February 2003, with release of the January 2003 index, revised interim indexes for the 12 months of 2002 will be published, and the index values for 2001 will be revised and will become final. Then, in February 2004, when the monthly expenditure data from calendar year 2002 become available, C-CPI-U indexes for the 12 months of 2002 will be issued in final form and values for the 12 months of 2003 will be revised and issued as interim. The C-CPI-U index revisions are expected to be small, but in principle each monthly index could be revised from its previously published level.

BLS previously has calculated superlative indexes on an experimental basis, although these are not comparable to the C-CPI-U in all computational details. (See, for example, Monthly Labor Review, December 1993, pp. 25-33.)

The C-CPI-U is issued for national averages only and will not be seasonally adjusted. It employs a December 1999=100 reference base. Data for periods prior to December 1999 have not been calculated. The component series that are published are listed below:

All items Medical care Food and beverages Medical care commodities Food Medical care services Food at home Recreation Food away from home Education and communication Alcoholic beverages Education Housing Communication Shelter Other goods and services Fuels and utilities Services Household furnishings Commodities and operations Durables Apparel Nondurables Transportation All items less food and energy Private transportation Energy Public transportation

These indexes are published monthly in the CPI news release and the CPI Detailed Report, and the series is available electronically at the same site as other CPI data: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/.

Or contact Patrick Jackman or Rob Cage either by telephone at (202) 691- 6952 or by electronic mail at Jackman_P@bls.gov or Cage_R@bls.gov .

Facilities for Sensory Impaired

Information from this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200, Federal Relay Services: 1-800-877-8339. For a recorded message of Summary CPI data, call (202) 691-5200.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · Original release Aug 16, 2002.

Archived Nov 11, 2026. Source reuse policy. Formatting has been adapted for reading; the source’s conclusions remain attributed to its publisher.

MortgageRates.news analysis · Historical context

The mortgage market around this release

This original analysis is separate from the source article. It compares observed benchmarks around ; historical averages and yields are not current mortgage offers.

Read consumer inflation on a consistent basis

The Consumer Price Index measures changes in prices paid by urban consumers for a basket of goods and services. Check the index, reference month and seasonal adjustment before comparing figures. A monthly change and a twelve-month change describe different periods; the all-items index and the measure excluding food and energy cover different baskets. Consumer inflation informs the wider policy discussion, but the benchmark comparison below does not isolate this release from other information arriving during the month. BLS Consumer Price Index.

Nearest published observation on or before each target date
Benchmark30 days earlierJul 17, 2002Publication referenceAug 16, 200230 days laterSep 15, 2002
30-year fixed mortgageNational weekly averageFreddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®6.54%Observed 6.22%Observed −32 bps vs. earlier reference6.18%Observed −4 bps vs. publication reference
10-year TreasuryDaily par yieldU.S. Department of the TreasuryUnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.UnavailableBefore available coverage, which starts Jan 4, 2016.

Calendar references, not an intraday reaction. A same-day market observation may have been published after a morning release. These figures do not show what was known at its exact publication time. One basis point (bp) is 0.01 percentage point; changes use the actual dated observations shown.

Six months around publication

May 16, 2002 – Nov 16, 2002
Historical mortgage and Treasury observations around Aug 16, 2002Each dot is a published observation. No missing values are estimated. The dashed vertical line marks the article’s publication calendar date. Rates and yields are percentages.5.50%6.25%7.00%Publication date30-year fixed mortgage: 6.89% · May 17, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.81% · May 24, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.76% · May 31, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Jun 7, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.71% · Jun 14, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.63% · Jun 21, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.55% · Jun 28, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.57% · Jul 5, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.54% · Jul 12, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.49% · Jul 19, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.34% · Jul 26, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.43% · Aug 2, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Aug 9, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 16, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.27% · Aug 23, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.22% · Aug 30, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Sep 6, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.18% · Sep 13, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.05% · Sep 20, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.99% · Sep 27, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.01% · Oct 4, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.98% · Oct 11, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.15% · Oct 18, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.31% · Oct 25, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.13% · Nov 1, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 6.11% · Nov 8, 200230-year fixed mortgage: 5.94% · Nov 15, 2002May 16, 2002Aug 16, 2002Nov 16, 2002
30-year fixed mortgage27 observations
Dots show published observations only. Missing dates remain blank, with no interpolation. The series have different publication schedules and measure different markets.

What that benchmark difference would mean for a $300,000 loan

At the publication reference$1,841.30/month

6.22% · Aug 16, 2002

At the later reference$1,833.52/month

6.18% · Sep 13, 2002

The illustrative principal-and-interest payment is $7.79 lower per month. This holds the loan amount and term constant to show the arithmetic effect of the benchmark difference.

Assumptions: two separate hypothetical $300,000 loans, each fully amortizing over 30 years with 360 monthly payments and its stated fixed interest rate. Excludes points, lender fees, taxes, insurance, association charges and other costs. PMMS is a national average, not an APR or a personalized rate offer. These are not two payments on one existing loan.

Sources, historical coverage and calculation limits

The 30-day comparisons use calendar days. Each cell selects the last published observation on or before its target; no rates are synthesized for missing dates. Gaps greater than seven days for daily Treasury data or fourteen days for weekly mortgage data are marked unavailable. Forward comparisons require the date to have arrived and source coverage to extend through it.

Historical files may contain revisions and do not reconstruct precisely what every market participant knew at the time. Freddie Mac changed its PMMS collection methodology in November 2022. Cross-period comparisons should account for that change. These windows include other news and cannot establish causation or forecast the next rate move.

How policy and mortgage rates connect →See current advertised mortgage options →